Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: US re-indicts Indian diplomat on visa fraud

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Last Seen
    08-18-15 @ 09:36 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    4,974

    US re-indicts Indian diplomat on visa fraud

    US re-indicts Indian diplomat on visa fraud

    New York (AFP) - A New York grand jury on Friday re-indicted an Indian diplomat accused of mistreating her housekeeper on two counts of visa fraud and making false statements, threatening to reignite a bitter row with New Delhi.

    The announcement from the Manhattan federal prosecutor came two days after a US judge threw out a previous case on the grounds that the former consular official was granted full diplomatic immunity after her arrest.

    But the new, 21-page indictment paints a devastating picture of the lengths to which Devyani Khobragade allegedly went to infringe US laws in hiring a nanny-cum-housekeeper when she moved to New York in 2012.

    Khobragade was arrested on December 12 outside her children's school and later strip-searched, enraging the Indian government and some of the Indian public.

    The diplomatic row between the two countries, which had embraced each other as strategic partners, strained ties and fanned resentment on both sides.

    US prosecutors, disputing her immunity, accuse Khobragade of forcing her Indian maid to work 100 hours or more a week, even when sick and without a full day off, for $1.42 or less an hour.

    The indictment accuses Khobragade of presenting false information to obtain a visa for her housekeeper and coaching her to lie to US Embassy officials.

    It says the Indian diplomat drew up a fake contract that conformed with US labor law but made her employee sign another contract the night they boarded a flight to New York in November 2012.

    The second contract stipulated a salary of $573 a month or $6,876 a year without overtime and the legal protections she was owed in the United States.

    The housekeeper worked from 6:30 am to as late as 9:30 pm or even midnight Monday to Saturday, the indictment says, and four hours on Sunday.

    It also accuses the diplomat of trying to silence and intimidate the housekeeper, who fled in June 2013 after she protested her conditions.

    The diplomat's lawyer Daniel Arshack refused to comment on the re-opening of the case.

    "The government of India will respond in due course," he said in a statement to AFP.

    Employed as a deputy consul general at the consulate in New York, Khobragade obtained in January the full immunity granted to diplomats at the Indian mission to the UN.

    It was on those grounds that she petitioned a US court on January 9 to drop the case, before flying back to India, where she now works for the foreign ministry.

    On Wednesday, US District Judge Shira Scheindlin dismissed the original indictment on the grounds that Khobragade was granted full diplomatic immunity the day before she left, on January 8.

    But the office of Preet Bharara, the US attorney for the Southern District of New York, then said it intended to re-charge the diplomat.

    The court had only found that Khobragade had immunity "during a limited period of time between January 8 and January 9, when the current indictment was returned by a grand injury," Bharara's spokesman said.

    "As the court indicted in this decision, and as Devyani Khobragade has conceded, there is currently no bar to a new indictment against her for her alleged criminal conduct, and we intend to proceed accordingly."

    India had welcomed the dismissal of the case, but the US State Department reserved judgment.

    "We were surprised by the dismissal of the indictment against former Indian Deputy Consul General Devyani Khobragade," spokeswoman Jen Psaki told reporters.

    Khobragade's father had thanked New Delhi for rallying behind the family and lashed out at the US for trying to frame his daughter in a "false" case.

    His daughter, who returned to India in January to a hero's welcome, has told a local newspaper about her anguish in leaving behind in New York her two young daughters and her husband, a US citizen and academic.
    Indian culture is very adverse to strip searching women. I don't understand why they felt it imperative to do the strip search. Our government agents need to be more careful about such things.

  2. #2
    On Vacation
    joko104's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 04:30 AM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    31,569
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: US re-indicts Indian diplomat on visa fraud

    Its not only India culture that doesn't like strip searches. Some Americans would care much for it either. Given the nature of the charges, there was no reason for a strip search.

  3. #3
    Sage
    RDS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Singapore
    Last Seen
    10-10-17 @ 05:51 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    5,398

    Re: US re-indicts Indian diplomat on visa fraud

    You guys made a big hoohah about the x-ray machines at your airports let alone strip-search of a diplomat.

  4. #4
    Dungeon Master
    Hooter Babe

    DiAnna's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Northern California
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    32,675
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: US re-indicts Indian diplomat on visa fraud

    Holy crap. Here's a woman who committed perjury, fraud, filed false papers with the US Government, bullied, intimidated and threatened her servant, abused the hell out of her until she finally ran away from that hellhole... and people on this thread are ignoring all that, expressing outrage that the woman was strip-searched upon arrest, just as every other prisoner is strip searched before the booking process.

    The priorities of some folks are... weird.

  5. #5
    Sage

    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    New York
    Last Seen
    12-13-17 @ 12:40 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Centrist
    Posts
    11,691

    Re: US re-indicts Indian diplomat on visa fraud

    Quote Originally Posted by DiAnna View Post
    Holy crap. Here's a woman who committed perjury, fraud, filed false papers with the US Government, bullied, intimidated and threatened her servant, abused the hell out of her until she finally ran away from that hellhole... and people on this thread are ignoring all that, expressing outrage that the woman was strip-searched upon arrest, just as every other prisoner is strip searched before the booking process.

    The priorities of some folks are... weird.
    Those are allegations. None of them have been proved, so one can't really say that the diplomat committed perjury, etc. Moreover, prior to the accuser's making her allegations, the diplomat had asked both U.S. and Indian authorities to investigate the accuser's possible extortion, so it's uncertain whether the accuser is even credible.

    Given the U.S. Attorney's initial press conference in which he laid out the accusations and very limited evidence that was cited, I suspect that the legal case is weak. What was presented appeared to marginally meet the criteria of "probable cause" threshold, which is a much lesser standard than "beyond a reasonable doubt" that would be required to obtain a conviction.

    Separately, the strip search should not have occurred. The allegations had nothing at all to do with smuggling of any kind. It was unreasonable in the face of the allegations that were made. That's why the strip search is an issue.

  6. #6
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Last Seen
    08-18-15 @ 09:36 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    4,974

    Re: US re-indicts Indian diplomat on visa fraud

    Quote Originally Posted by DiAnna View Post
    Holy crap. Here's a woman who committed perjury, fraud, filed false papers with the US Government, bullied, intimidated and threatened her servant, abused the hell out of her until she finally ran away from that hellhole... and people on this thread are ignoring all that, expressing outrage that the woman was strip-searched upon arrest, just as every other prisoner is strip searched before the booking process.

    The priorities of some folks are... weird.
    You may say it's weird, but I don't think you have been around many Indian people. Especially, some of the ones from India are extremely conservative. They view such a strip search to be the practical equivalent of rape. As such, there was no need to conduct the strip search in this instance.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •