And it is goddamned hilarious that you point to the ACARS system as being indicative of understanding what really happened. You have absolutely, positively no evidence that ACARS was in any way relevant. And that's what differentiates a conspiracy theorist from everybody else. Your (ridiculously convoluted) theories require no evidence.
I suppose you make the same brain-dead conclusions about the Mayor of Shanksville, and the vanishing of Flight 93, because we've seen no debris field that even remotely resembles that which is to be expected from a high or low angle of attack crash site that was alleged by the official story tellers. Yet, you have the audacity to speak of evidence as though she is your close friend.
The more you type, the more deluded you become. You don't understand the systems or the technology involved, but you want to pretend that you do, and your last statement proves it. Do you even know the difference between SATCOM ACARS and RF ACARS? Did you even know that there were mutliple ACARS carrier types? Do you have the slightest idea what you are talking about?
A commercial aircraft weighing well over 200,000lbs has just vanished with more than 230 people on-board. That aircraft just happened to be a Boeing 777. A Boeing 777 is not a Boeing 727. The Boeing 777's avionics suite, flight management system, navigation system and air data systems are different. It was designed with aviation technology that DID NOT EXIST during the development of the Boeing 727.
So, when you sit on the fat of your rear-end and conclude that ACARS had absolutely nothing to do with the traceless disappearance of Flight 370, it tells me and anyone having any clue whatsoever, that you are grasping for straws and clutching to anything that gives you credibility on the subject. Why? Because, absent a local, physical, mechanical abnormality as cause, the ONLY way to communicate with Flight 370's FMS, is through its SATCOM ACARS. Why? Because you CANNOT direct the FMS/FMC through any other means absent direct, local, physical intervention on-board the aircraft.
That means that there are ONLY two (2) possibilities:
1) Someone physically skyjacked a Boeing 777 over water with a fuel load offering no more than a 2,200nm radius.
2) Someone virtually skyjacked a Boeing 777 over water from the ground and through SATCOM ACARS with the exact same 2,200nm radius.
Either way, until we find debris that says otherwise - I am 100% certain that someone skyjacked Flight 370. Whether physical or virtual, remains to be seen. That this aircraft was skyjacked by someone, is not even a question in my mind given the evidence thus far.