Page 4 of 13 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 126

Thread: EPA Set to reveal new Sulfer regulations

  1. #31
    Sage

    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    The Republic of Texas.
    Last Seen
    11-15-17 @ 11:40 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    5,647

    Re: EPA Set to reveal new Sulfer regulations

    Quote Originally Posted by notquiteright View Post
    You play silly CON games, so the quacks like a duck clause is invoked.

    I gave you an answer, it just isn't what you wanted. I leave the measuring and calibration to those who have the training, not the likes of Anthony Watts.

    Personally I'd go with grams per hour of engine operation as that is what my tractor uses. But do feel free to nit pick. I do have to ask, are you sure the EPA who sets the MPG ratings doesn't know the fuel mileage? Is this going to be one of those rants about the MPG sticker???
    Ah, so you don't bother actually observing things and thinking for yourself? If so, then I guess you really are a progressive.
    Only a fool measures equality by results and not opportunities.

  2. #32
    Sage
    apdst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Bagdad, La.
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 08:55 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    76,584

    Re: EPA Set to reveal new Sulfer regulations

    Quote Originally Posted by Deuce View Post
    How much does respiratory disease cost? I need to know so that I can make an informed decision as a consumer as to whether I want cheaper gasoline or healthier lungs.
    Its irrelevant, since the economy is going to be in the toilet because of too much government regulation. Betwee Obamacare and the EPA, you wont be able to afford treatment, anyway.
    Quote Originally Posted by Top Cat View Post
    At least Bill saved his transgressions for grown women. Not suggesting what he did was OK. But he didn't chase 14 year olds.

  3. #33
    Outer space potato man

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Last Seen
    12-16-17 @ 11:29 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    51,849

    Re: EPA Set to reveal new Sulfer regulations

    Quote Originally Posted by apdst View Post
    Its irrelevant, since the economy is going to be in the toilet because of too much government regulation. Betwee Obamacare and the EPA, you wont be able to afford treatment, anyway.
    I wont be able to afford treatment for lung cancer, so the more expensive gasoline sounds like a better choice.
    He touched her over her bra and underpants, she says, and guided her hand to touch him over his underwear
    Quote Originally Posted by Lutherf View Post
    We’ll say what? Something like “nothing happened” ... Yeah, we might say something like that.

  4. #34
    Sage

    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    The Republic of Texas.
    Last Seen
    11-15-17 @ 11:40 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    5,647

    Re: EPA Set to reveal new Sulfer regulations

    Quote Originally Posted by Deuce View Post
    "I alter my vehicle, and it gets different mileage than what the claim is for the base model!"

    Holy **** you just can't make this stuff up.

    What kind of vehicle do you drive?
    Which one?

    For those who don't know crap about cars, fuel mileage is a function of many different factors. Aerodynamic drag and gearing have far more to do with fuel mileage than anything else. Then there is the whole functions of timing, spark control, friction, rotating mass, and the list goes on and on. The best way to improve gas mileage on average would be to shut down the EPA. Their stupidity is the greatest pollution creator know to man.

    They cannot even figure out that if the only two byproducts of a perfect burn is CO2 and water, then there is absolutely no way to improve efficiency of the burn without upping the ratio of CO2.
    Only a fool measures equality by results and not opportunities.

  5. #35
    Sage

    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    The Republic of Texas.
    Last Seen
    11-15-17 @ 11:40 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    5,647

    Re: EPA Set to reveal new Sulfer regulations

    Quote Originally Posted by Deuce View Post
    I wont be able to afford treatment for lung cancer, so the more expensive gasoline sounds like a better choice.
    Right. Crash the economy, cost everyone tons more money just to live because you are afraid you might get lung cancer from automobile emissions. NM that it is only one source of thousands that put off cancer causing byproducts. This whole "emissions cause cancer" thing is so stupid, only the left could think it up and believe it.
    Only a fool measures equality by results and not opportunities.

  6. #36
    Outer space potato man

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Last Seen
    12-16-17 @ 11:29 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    51,849

    Re: EPA Set to reveal new Sulfer regulations

    Quote Originally Posted by DVSentinel View Post
    Ah, so you don't bother actually observing things and thinking for yourself? If so, then I guess you really are a progressive.
    What kind of vehicle do you drive? How did you measure the mileage? Did you write down distances driven, to the tenth of a mile? Did you measure the gasoline in your tank before and after, to the tenth of a gallon? Did you control for changes in weight, temperature, pressure, and winds? Road conditions? Tire pressure? What was the temperature of the gasoline when put into your tank? How about after driving?

    If you think your personal, completely unorganized, non-recorded observations are better than someone actually paying attention to the variables mentioned above, and more, you make a perfect conservative.
    He touched her over her bra and underpants, she says, and guided her hand to touch him over his underwear
    Quote Originally Posted by Lutherf View Post
    We’ll say what? Something like “nothing happened” ... Yeah, we might say something like that.

  7. #37
    Outer space potato man

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Last Seen
    12-16-17 @ 11:29 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    51,849

    Re: EPA Set to reveal new Sulfer regulations

    Quote Originally Posted by DVSentinel View Post
    This whole "emissions cause cancer" thing is so stupid, only the left could think it up and believe it.
    I'm just going to let this comment stand on its own.
    He touched her over her bra and underpants, she says, and guided her hand to touch him over his underwear
    Quote Originally Posted by Lutherf View Post
    We’ll say what? Something like “nothing happened” ... Yeah, we might say something like that.

  8. #38
    Sage
    apdst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Bagdad, La.
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 08:55 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    76,584

    Re: EPA Set to reveal new Sulfer regulations

    Quote Originally Posted by Deuce View Post
    I wont be able to afford treatment for lung cancer, so the more expensive gasoline sounds like a better choice.
    Why do you support destroying our economy?
    Quote Originally Posted by Top Cat View Post
    At least Bill saved his transgressions for grown women. Not suggesting what he did was OK. But he didn't chase 14 year olds.

  9. #39
    Sage

    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    The Republic of Texas.
    Last Seen
    11-15-17 @ 11:40 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    5,647

    Re: EPA Set to reveal new Sulfer regulations

    Quote Originally Posted by apdst View Post
    Why do you support destroying our economy?
    All environmentalist do. Actually taking in economic affect has never entered into anything they have ever pushed.
    Only a fool measures equality by results and not opportunities.

  10. #40
    Outer space potato man

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Last Seen
    12-16-17 @ 11:29 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    51,849

    Re: EPA Set to reveal new Sulfer regulations

    Quote Originally Posted by apdst View Post
    Why do you support destroying our economy?
    Why do you support giving lung cancer to children?
    He touched her over her bra and underpants, she says, and guided her hand to touch him over his underwear
    Quote Originally Posted by Lutherf View Post
    We’ll say what? Something like “nothing happened” ... Yeah, we might say something like that.

Page 4 of 13 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •