• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Gay hair stylist drops New Mexico governor as client because she opposes same-sex...

Re: The Other Side of the Coin

AGENT J said:
weird did you ask me that? nope
did anybody ask me that? nope
did the OP even ask that? nope
Click to expand...

Kinda implied, dude. I think everyone knows the law. This isn't a forum of lawyers as far as I know (if it is, I'm in the wrong place)...and no one specifically asked what the correct legal determination was. So I think the question was more about opinion, by default.
 
Re: The Other Side of the Coin

OldWorldOrder said:
Kinda implied, dude. I think everyone knows the law. This isn't a forum of lawyers as far as I know (if it is, I'm in the wrong place)...and no one specifically asked what the correct legal determination was. So I think the question was more about opinion, by default.
Click to expand...

SO you don't have a specific question?


the OP implied nothing like that, the OP said they should sue, sounds pretty legal to me lol

and obviously this thread proves you are wrong, there are many in it that have no clue about the law as they proved

SO you don't have a specific question?
do you think age, gender, race/origin/color, religion sexual orientation is good criteria? i do
 
Re: The Other Side of the Coin

AGENT J said:
SO you don't have a specific question?
Click to expand...

Who said that? What criteria are okay to discriminate upon and which are not?

I personally, think they all are, more most (but not all) private businesses.
 
Re: The Other Side of the Coin

OldWorldOrder said:
1.)Who said that?
2.)What criteria are okay to discriminate upon and which are not?
3.)I personally, think they all are, more most (but not all) private businesses.
Click to expand...

1.) well since i asked and you didnt i was "implied" lol
2.) already answered
i think the law and rights got it pretty spot on age, gender, race/origin/color, religion sexual orientation is pretty good
3.) I have no idea what you are saying here
 
Re: The Other Side of the Coin

AGENT J said:
1.) well since i asked and you didnt i was "implied" lol
2.) already answered
i think the law and rights got it pretty spot on age, gender, race/origin/color, religion sexual orientation is pretty good
3.) I have no idea what you are saying here
Click to expand...

lol what? Was this a serious post or a joke post? I'll wait for your next one.

Unless you mean some discrimination by private businesses is cool and some isn't, in which case I disagree.
 
Re: The Other Side of the Coin

OldWorldOrder said:
lol what? Was this a serious post or a joke post? I'll wait for your next one.

Unless you mean some discrimination by private businesses is cool and some isn't, in which case I disagree.
Click to expand...

good grief LMAO you must be young

ill say it for a 3rd time in a more specific way

I think the law got it pretty spot on and it protects our rights very well.

I think the illegal discrimination criteria of gender, race/origin/color, religion and sexual orientation is pretty good


Yes some discrimination is absolutely fine and some is not, i only care about peoples rights not thier feelings.
 
Re: The Other Side of the Coin

AGENT J said:
good grief LMAO you must be young

ill say it for a 3rd time in a more specific way

I think the law got it pretty spot on and it protects our rights very well.

I think the illegal discrimination criteria of gender, race/origin/color, religion and sexual orientation is pretty good


Yes some discrimination is absolutely fine and some is not, i only care about peoples rights not thier feelings.
Click to expand...

Errr...that was weird as **** lol

Okay, fine. Then we disagree on what discrimination is acceptable. Cool.
 
Re: The Other Side of the Coin

OldWorldOrder said:
Errr...that was weird as **** lol

Okay, fine. Then we disagree on what discrimination is acceptable. Cool.
Click to expand...

so you dont want peoples rights protected?

if i gut comes into my store and starts saying all women are bitches and ****s and i choose to discriminate against him you think that is wrong?
 
Re: The Other Side of the Coin

AGENT J said:
so you dont want peoples rights protected?
Click to expand...

lol? Is that your argument now?

if i gut comes into my store and starts saying all women are bitches and ****s and i choose to discriminate against him you think that is wrong?
Click to expand...

no? What did I say that led you to believe that?
 
Re: The Other Side of the Coin

OldWorldOrder said:
1.)lol? Is that your argument now?
2.)no? What did I say that led you to believe that?
Click to expand...

1.) nope not at all, it could be what you said though
hence the QUESTION, thats how questions work, notice the question mark lol

i think the criteria is good because it protects rights, you do not think the criteria is good, so the question is WHY?

now you have to explain why, this isnt a hard concept

2.) again you have issues with questions dont you.

this is why i asked because you have not made your position clear in the least while mine is VERY clear

YOU said you dont think some discrimaintion should be allowed and others not allowed, YOU said that. SO was that not true?

YOU have to explain your position, this is why i guessed you were young and i bet thats 100% accurate.

if these questions are too hard simply explain what type of discrimaintion you are ok with and not ok with, youll have better success.
 
Re: The Other Side of the Coin

AGENT J said:
1.) nope not at all, it could be what you said though
hence the QUESTION, thats how questions work, notice the question mark lol

i think the criteria is good because it protects rights, you do not think the criteria is good, so the question is WHY?

now you have to explain why, this isnt a hard concept

2.) again you have issues with questions dont you.

this is why i asked because you have not made your position clear in the least while mine is VERY clear

YOU said you dont think some discrimaintion should be allowed and others not allowed, YOU said that. SO was that not true?

YOU have to explain your position, this is why i guessed you were young and i bet thats 100% accurate.

if these questions are too hard simply explain what type of discrimaintion you are ok with and not ok with, youll have better success.
Click to expand...

What is your weird issue, dude? I'm 33. I explained what I was okay with and what I wasn't. Do you need me to repeat it cause you didn't read it? Lemme know.
 
Re: The Other Side of the Coin

OldWorldOrder said:
What is your weird issue, dude? I'm 33. I explained what I was okay with and what I wasn't. Do you need me to repeat it cause you didn't read it? Lemme know.
Click to expand...
its your inablity to communicate

but to answer your question, yep repeat it, because you never said it to me

remember YOU addressed me

i didnt go reading through all your posts to find out your views. You addressed me and didnt say much of anything and was totally 100% wrong about my post so now that i was very clear about my stances what is yours.


WHat discrimination do you think is ok and not ok
 
Re: Gay hair stylist drops New Mexico governor as client because she opposes same-sex

AGENT J said:
its your inablity to communicate

but to answer your question, yep repeat it, because you never said it to me

remember YOU addressed me

i didnt go reading through all your posts to find out your views. You addressed me and didnt say much of anything and was totally 100% wrong about my post so now that i was very clear about my stances what is yours.


WHat discrimination do you think is ok and not ok
Click to expand...

lol have you ever heard of nonlinear thinkers? This is interesting. You're all over the place.

Here, for your edification:

OldWorldOrder said:
I'm all for private businesses (for the most part) being able to offer or refuse services as they see fit.

Photographer doesn't want gay customers? Fine, whatever, that's cool by me.

Hairdresser doesn't want customers that are against gay marriage? Fine, whatever, that's cool by me.

No one should be able to see either of them for that, in my perfect world.
Click to expand...

You're...into the law, and that's cool. I'm not. I don't understand why this brings you so much consternation, why you feel that you should post so abstractly. But that's cool, you can if you want, I'm not mad about it or anything.
 
Re: Gay hair stylist drops New Mexico governor as client because she opposes same-sex

OldWorldOrder said:
1.)lol have you ever heard of nonlinear thinkers?
2.)This is interesting. You're all over the place.

3.)Here, for your edification:



4.)You're...into the law, and that's cool.
5.)I'm not.
6.)I don't understand why this brings you so much consternation
7.) why you feel that you should post so abstractly.
8.)But that's cool, you can if you want
9.), I'm not mad about it or anything.
Click to expand...

1.) yes i am one
2.) yes you are
3.) thanks for explanation
4.) yes in this case i think the law lines up nicely
5.) so i was correct you dont want peoples rights protected, thanks for proving that
6.) it doesnt, you wouldn't explain your position you just keep posting like i knew it lol
7.) i didnt i was VERY clear, like i said YOU addressed me and was wrong from post one LMAO
8.) yes i know
9.) thats good because i wasnt trying to make you mad but it wouldnt matter if you were

you dont care about peoples rights, thats cool, i do and want them protected
 
Re: Gay hair stylist drops New Mexico governor as client because she opposes same-sex

AGENT J said:
1.) yes i am one
Click to expand...

lol no ****.

2.) yes you are
Click to expand...

lol? I've been pretty succinct and consistent, but alright.

3.) thanks for explanation
Click to expand...

You're welcome.

4.) yes in this case i think the law lines up nicely
Click to expand...

Okay.

5.) so i was correct you dont want peoples rights protected, thanks for proving that
Click to expand...

lol okay.

6.) it doesnt, you wouldn't explain your position you just keep posting like i knew it lol
Click to expand...

I didn't think you were dumb?

7.) i didnt i was VERY clear, like i said YOU addressed me and was wrong from post one LMAO
Click to expand...

Did that make sense in your head when you typed it?

8.) yes i know
Click to expand...

good.

9.) thats good because i wasnt trying to make you mad but it wouldnt matter if you were
Click to expand...

Great.

you dont care about peoples rights, thats cool, i do and want them protected
Click to expand...

This is what it all comes down: you care about what you think are rights. Great. I don't care about feelings. I don't care about sympathy. I just don't care. You do and that's cool. Don't be surprised when people say, instead of "I care about discrimination sometimes, but not others", just "I don't care about it". At least those people are consistent, you see.
 
Re: Gay hair stylist drops New Mexico governor as client because she opposes same-sex

OldWorldOrder said:
1.)This is what it all comes down: you care about what you think are rights. Great.
2.)I don't care about feelings.
3.) I don't care about sympathy. I just don't care.
4.) You do and that's cool.
5.) Don't be surprised when people say, instead of "I care about discrimination sometimes, but not others", just "I don't care about it". At least those people are consistent, you see.
Click to expand...

1.) Wrong
2.) good neither do i
3.) good neither do i
4.) Wrong again
5.) great for them

glad i could help you with your confusion lol
you dont care about peoples rights, thats your choice :shrug:
 
Re: Gay hair stylist drops New Mexico governor as client because she opposes same-sex

AGENT J said:
1.) Wrong
2.) good neither do i
3.) good neither do i
4.) Wrong again
5.) great for them

glad i could help you with your confusion lol
you dont care about peoples rights, thats your choice :shrug:
Click to expand...

Wait lol

Are you saying your opinions about rights are actually facts? lol

"you must be young" lol holy **** this is great lol "glad I could help with your confusion" looool
 
Re: Gay hair stylist drops New Mexico governor as client because she opposes same-sex

OldWorldOrder said:
Wait lol
1.)Are you saying your opinions about rights are actually facts? lol
2.)"you must be young" lol holy **** this is great lol "glad I could help with your confusion" looool
Click to expand...

1.) I havent given you any opinion about what rights are, not once. If you disagree simply quote me doing so I cat wait to read it lol
2.) yes i still have that opinion about you

seems you are making up a lot in your head and not actually discussion what is being posted lol let me know when you have that quote ;)
 
Re: Gay hair stylist drops New Mexico governor as client because she opposes same-sex

AGENT J said:
1.) I havent given you any opinion about what rights are, not once.
Click to expand...

Sure you have. You've said that my opinion means I don't care about people's rights. What you really mean is that my opinion says I don't care about your stance on people's rights. Which is true! I don't know who you are anyway!

I love how aggressive you're being, this is fun. Make sure to insult me somehow in your next post, I love it!
 
Re: Gay hair stylist drops New Mexico governor as client because she opposes same-sex

OldWorldOrder said:
1.) Sure you have.
2.) You've said that my opinion means I don't care about people's rights.
3.) What you really mean is that my opinion says I don't care about your stance on people's rights. Which is true!
4.) I don't know who you are anyway!
5.)I love how aggressive you're being, this is fun.
6.) Make sure to insult me somehow in your next post
7.) I love it!
Click to expand...

1.) nope, again if you disagree simply quote me
2.) yes this is a fact
3.) this is 100% false, i dont make rights nor have given my stance on them one time. again if you disagree simply qoute me doing this lol
4.) true
5.) LMAO i haven't been aggressive one time, not one lol wow you make a lot up just like i said
6.) haven't done this yet so why start now
7.) im glad you like being factually wrong :)

I will ask you again to prove the lie you posted and for you to qoute me giving you my opinion on what rights are. I bet you dodge this request again since i never did it once.
 
Re: Gay hair stylist drops New Mexico governor as client because she opposes same-sex

AGENT J said:
1.) nope, again if you disagree simply quote me
2.) yes this is a fact
3.) this is 100% false, i dont make rights nor have given my stance on them one time. again if you disagree simply qoute me doing this lol
4.) true
5.) LMAO i haven't been aggressive one time, not one lol wow you make a lot up just like i said
6.) haven't done this yet so why start now
7.) im glad you like being factually wrong :)

I will ask you again to prove the lie you posted and for you to qoute me giving you my opinion on what rights are. I bet you dodge this request again since i never did it once.
Click to expand...

This couldn't have been a serious post. When you say I don't support rights, you're giving your opinion on what rights are.

lol you're so silly!
 
Re: Gay hair stylist drops New Mexico governor as client because she opposes same-sex

OldWorldOrder said:
1.)This couldn't have been a serious post.
2.) When you say I don't support rights, you're giving your opinion on what rights are.
3.)lol you're so silly!
Click to expand...
NAILED IT!!!!

i knew you would dodge the question AGAIN

translation: "no agent J i have ZERO proof of the lie i posted "
thanks i knew that

let me know when this fact changes and you can support the lie you posted lol
 
Re: Gay hair stylist drops New Mexico governor as client because she opposes same-sex

AGENT J said:
NAILED IT!!!!

i knew you would dodge the question AGAIN

translation: "no agent J i have ZERO proof of the lie i posted "
thanks i knew that

let me know when this fact changes and you can support the lie you posted lol
Click to expand...

What in god's name are you talking about. You're going very nonlinear on me, I'm going to have to ask that you focus.

Apparently, you think your opinion=fact. That's...weird, especially considering that we have already agreed that you and I aren't talking about legalities.

Could you stop kidding around- stop being a weirdo- and make a serious post?
 
Re: Gay hair stylist drops New Mexico governor as client because she opposes same-sex

OldWorldOrder said:
What in god's name are you talking about. You're going very nonlinear on me, I'm going to have to ask that you focus.

Apparently, you think your opinion=fact. That's...weird, especially considering that we have already agreed that you and I aren't talking about legalities.

Could you stop kidding around- stop being a weirdo- and make a serious post?
Click to expand...

Weird i still see ZERO qoute of this lie you are trying to sell, let me know when you can back your statement up instead of making stuff up

who wants to bet this request is dodged AGAIN
 
Re: Gay hair stylist drops New Mexico governor as client because she opposes same-sex

AGENT J said:
Weird i still see ZERO qoute of this lie you are trying to sell, let me know when you can back your statement up instead of making stuff up

who wants to bet this request is dodged AGAIN
Click to expand...

what do you think is a lie?!

lol this is so weird
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom