“Most people do not listen with the intent to understand; they listen with the intent to reply.”
― Stephen R. Covey
"I am appalled that somebody who is the nominee...would take that kind of position"
"A court took away a presidency"
"...the brother of a man running for president was the governor of the state..."
It's horrifying because Trump is blunt instead of making overt implications.
The hair dresser chose the Governer to ban...not all persons that oppose SSM, or All governors that oppose SSM. One person.
Say you owned a bar. A group of skinheads moves in and wants to make your bar their neighborhood bar. It's fairly likely that a constant skinhead presence at your bar is going to negatively affect other customers, harming your business. It would seem obvious that a business should be well within their rights to kick the skinheads out. But can a business owner kick someone out because they suspect someone may be racist? Put another way, a bar is going to be equally adverse to being frequented by black gang members. But can they deny someone entrance because they're black and wear saggy pants. Wouldn’t that likely be racial discrimination?
What we're really asking is where my right to be included meets your right to exclude me. And I don't think that line is very clear.
Last edited by 1750Texan; 03-04-14 at 05:38 PM.