762. Target on New York (3/9/2013)
The main target city of a "terror attack" is New York.
Al Qaida is a secret asset of US. It works for US strategy interest. Bin Laden worked as a living plant. The country where he went, was claimed “evil axis” by US. Under such excuse, Bush activated war in Mid-east. Abu Ghaith- Bin Laden’s son in law – has the same mission. He was arranged to smuggle to Iran in 2002 at the purpose to frame Iran a “terrorist” country. Iran might have known the trick and put Bin Laden’s “refugee relatives” into prison.Bin Laden son-in-law arrested, whisked to NYC on terror charges
Officials tell NBC News he had been a prisoner in Iran for most of the past decade and is scheduled to appear in federal court Friday. NBC's Brian Williams reports.
By Jonathan Dienst, Pete Williams and Andrea Mitchell, NBC News
Osama bin Laden's son-in-law, who acted as a spokesman for al-Qaida, has been apprehended, transported to New York and charged with conspiracy to kill Americans, according to court documents unsealed Thursday.
Bin Laden son-in-law arrested, whisked to NYC on terror charges - World News
Now when the Feds planed another “terror attack” on US, they need a complete story – a big head of terrorist is on trial in New York. Al Qaida revenges the trial with a nuke attack. Since the frame case was original projected in March – we saw just in days, Abu Ghaith was arrested and sent to New York. What a rush.
New York has been the target in Feds’ blacklist for a long time under the same project. The terror attack was designed to trigger war on Iran that would be used to distract a framed case. An identical one was the attempt to try Khalid Shaikh Mohammed in New York. From the news you could see the master mind was the D.O.J. Chief Eric Holder.
Accused 9/11 Mastermind to Face Civilian Trial in N.Y.
By CHARLIE SAVAGE November 13, 2009
The decision, announced by Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr., could mean one of the highest-profile and highest-security terrorism trials in history would be set just blocks from where hijackers for Al Qaeda destroyed the World Trade Center, killing nearly 2,750 people.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/14/us...anted=all&_r=0New Yorkers might have been aware of the plot planted on them. They fiercely opposed it and successfully rejected that trial. Eric Holder knows it. He still puts another one on them in a raid.The Trial
Eric Holder and the battle over Khalid Sheikh Mohammed.
by Jane Mayer February 15, 2010
On December 5th, several hundred people gathered in Foley Square, in lower Manhattan, and withstood a drenching rainstorm for two hours in order to send a message to Attorney General Eric Holder. A JumboTron, set up by the protesters, played clips of Holder’s recent testimony before Congress, in which he explained his decision to hold the trial of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed—the self-proclaimed planner of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001—and four co-conspirators in the colonnaded federal courthouse flanking the square, rather than in a military commission at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba. Members of the crowd shouted at the
Eric Holder and the Khalid Sheikh Mohammed trial : The New Yorker
763. Why select New York? (3/18/2013)
Several years after 911 attack, people were rattled by unusual cancer case among first responders of ground zero. They started to think the WTC were pulled down by mini nukes.
"35 Reasons for Many Small Fission Nukes at the WTC
Thursday, July 02, 2009
1) heat generation at ground zero for six months (china syndrome)
http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2009/07/35-reasons-for-many-small-fission-nukes.html"Then cancer caused death rapidly rose. 345 Ground Zero workers have died of various cancers as of June 2010."China Syndrome at the WTC
Now you should understand why Eric Holder announced to put "911 mastermind K.S.Mohammed " on trial in New York" in 2009. It was used to justify an "Al Qaida revenge attack for trial of their leader". The planned attack was a nuclear one, so they could blame the cancer were caused by Al Qaida terror attack. The purpose is to cover up the truth that in 911 attack, mini nukes were used. The similar tactic has been tried in 2007, when a B-52 flied over US continental with 6 loaded nuke missiles. New York must have been the target of these nuclear missiles. Of course, mainstream media beat the drum on “911 Master-mind trial” but rarely report the unusual cancer deaths of the first responders of ground zero. Because that would expose who was the real Master-mind of 911 – Al Qaida has no nuclear bomb."9/11 NUKE DEMOLITION PROOF: Firefighters Radiation Cancers “Off the Scale”
April 4, 2011 By Daily Mail Reporter
A seven-year study by the New York Fire Department has claimed that there are ‘unusual rises’ in the number of cancer cases among firefighters who worked in the aftermath of 9/11.
Dr. David Prezant, the Fire Department’s chief medical officer, has reportedly said that cancer cases across ‘all ranks’ of the FDNY who worked at Ground Zero are ‘up significantly’.
It is thought that the report – due to be officially disclosed in time for the 10th anniversary of the terror attacks in September – cites unusual rises in leukemia, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and multiple myeloma.
‘It’s a fact that New York City firefighters are dying of cancer in record numbers.
‘We have buried 10 firefighters in just the last 15 weeks, seven with cancer. On Sept. 10, 2001, they were young, healthy firefighters.’
The New York state Health Department has confirmed that 345 Ground Zero workers have died of various cancers as of June 2010.
Reasons against mini nukes:
Lack of radiation consistent with nuclear detonation.
Lack of damage consistent with nuclear detonation.
Lack of reason to use nukes at all.
Lack of motivation for any entity capable of creating such a device.
One of you will end up here next!
use of micro-nukes to takedown the WTC complex — 9/11 through different eyes
NEW YORK CITY (INTELLIHUB)
The use of micro-nukes in the WTC complex on 9/11–the smoking gun
Dr. Ed Ward has documented what he believes is the use of micro-nukes on the World Trade Center complex attack that took place in September of 2001.
One of the smoking guns in this case is that over 5.3 billion pounds of steel was instantly turned into 2 billion pounds of dust, but that’s not all.
Massive steel beams were bent like pretzels as the towers collapsed.
One video shows the penthouse on building 7 being demolished on the roof just before the building comes down. This proves that a top-down demolition process was being utilized, otherwise the buildings might have just twisted, naturally falling over themselves. But perhaps the most startling revelation is the fact that vehicles looked incinerated up to one mile away from the towers. Cars were even flipped over as if they came out of a war zone.
The fact that many of the first responders are now dead if not very sick does not sound like the byproduct of a falling building but more like they got a massive dose of deadly radiation. Most of the responders have died of blood cancer, yet another sign of radiation exposure.
Cars not hit by falling debris yet totally destroyed far away from the towers
Molten metal was seen in and around the debris of the WTC for months.
There is also the fact that the debris field was substantially low for the magnitude of buildings that were destroyed, thus signifying that most of the debris was incinerated upon the demo blast.
Massive craters under the WTC complex were formed, likely from the detonation of micro-nukes, as the rock was even melted smooth. Later after the site was fairly cleaned up and the craters were excavated, the city of New York continued to wash down the cavities with hoses daily for years as traces of Tritium were found, signifying the use of nuclear weaponry. Evidence shows that levels of Tritium were 55 times higher than normal in the WTC debris. Tritium is a by-product of a nuclear blast…..
The use of micro-nukes to takedown the WTC complex -- 9/11 through different eyes | Intellihub News
The stuff these guys declare as "proven fact" is always amusing.
One of you will end up here next!