I've heard no screams of racism over the garbage being thrown at Mr. Obama over Ukraine, j-mac, since you're into names.
I didn't say there was. That is just you trying hard to twist my words so you can attack them...What I am saying is that should there be a sudden spine to be found in congress these days, and a special prosecutor, or even a select joint committee formed to really get to the bottom of this, that call of 'racism' will be heard right out of the box by liberals like you that have nothing to actually defend him on. It's predictable.
Saying Obama can't be found guilty on IRS hasn't stopped Senators Graham, McCain and Cruz to start with from calling Obama weak and feckless.
Who said he can't be found guilty? We must first get to the truth. That's something that Obama, and his liberal minions have blocked since the start...That isn't the action of an innocent person, that is not the "most transparent administration in history" as he promised. Yet, that is fine with you because either you are such a dupe that you just follow blindly, or such a partisan that you will not admit the truth. Now, I don't think you are dumb enough to be a dupe, so that only leaves dishonest.
And I've heard no leftie say it is racism.
Really? And I would have thought that a tv somewhere around you plays MSNBC non stop...From June of last year:
On the Martin Bashir show Wednesday, the host actually said that Republicans are using the acronym "IRS" as the latest dog whistle in their "war against the black man in the White House"
Read more:
MSNBC's Bashir: IRS Investigation a Racist Republican Attack on 'Black Man in White House' | NewsBusters
Then while we are at it, let's take a look a month earlier in May, at an interview with Julian Bond on MSNBC, I'll even use a self described black news source, even with the name calling editorializing they do....
"Meanwhile, Julian Bond, chairman emeritus of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), offered an alternatively refreshing view about the IRS targeting of Tea Party-affiliated groups earlier Tuesday morning on MSNBC.
Bond said he didn’t think the federal government is wrong for signaling out the conservative groups for extensive reviews given that they are “overly racist.”
Back in 2006, the NAACP was the subject of its own controversial review from the Internal Revenue Service, after they criticized then-President George W. Bush during the 2004 presidential campaign. Ultimately, the IRS ruled that the nation’s oldest civil rights organization “continued to qualify” as tax-exempt. In an interview with The Washington Post, Bond said of the investigation: “It was an enormous threat” and noted that had the IRS revoked its tax exempt status it “would have reduced our income remarkably.”
Bond went further, suggesting that the investigation was politically motivated and the end result ”meant that they thought they had harassed us enough and they could stop.”
So is there a double standard in Bond giving the IRS free reign to target groups whose views oppose his?
Bond told MSNBC anchor Thomas Roberts, “I don’t think there’s a double standard at all. I think it’s entirely legitimate to look at the Tea Party.
“I mean, here are a group of people who are admittedly racist, who are overtly political, who tried as best they can to harm President Obama in every way they can,” Bond explained.
“[The Tea Party] is the Taliban wing of American politics and we all ought to be a little worried about them.”
When asked if he thought that his comments were “a little harsh,” Bond quipped, “The truth hurts.”
IRS Tea Party Investigation: Julian Bond Defends IRS Targeting of Tea Party Groups | News One
Anti-American, you bet, but not racist .
I remember a time (since y'all so love to bring up G.W. Bush at every turn) when you progressives would lose your damned mind if we called you "anti American".... Remember this little diddy from Hillary?
So spare me your crybaby "it's not fair" meme....You libs started this discourse, now you reap it.