• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Lois Lerner does about-face, will give Hill testimony on IRS scandal

lerner testified because she was compelled by issa to do so
and you term that democrat driven theatre. your characterization is stunningly off the mark

issa ended the committee hearing after inviting cumings to ask a question but before allowing him to do so
such an indication the republicans' intent is to get the truth out
View attachment 67163005
That would be accurate if Cummings actually knew the truth. He doesn't. So silencing him makes no difference.
 
Are you against the Constitution when it doesn't fit your needs ?

Grab a mirror.

If there was nothing there then there is no reason for her to take the 5th. The fact that she took the 5th shows that there is something to hide.
 
I$$A lied to Chris Wallace on Sunday.
Why are Democrats not allowed to speak at ISSA's kangaroo court?
Americans are embarrassed at what ISSA did, unplugging the sound system .
 
lerner testified because she was compelled
by issa to do so
and you term that democrat driven theatre. your characterization is stunningly off the mark

issa ended the committee hearing after inviting cumings to ask a question but before allowing him to do so
such an indication the republicans' intent is to get the truth out
View attachment 67163005


She "testified " did she ?
 
I$$A lied to Chris Wallace on Sunday.
Why are Democrats not allowed to speak at ISSA's kangaroo court?
Americans are embarrassed at what ISSA did, unplugging the sound system .
Lerner, the Main Democrat we cared about, had all the opportunity to speak and she refused to do so.
 
Grab a mirror.

If there was nothing there then there is no reason for her to take the 5th. The fact that she took the 5th shows that there is something to hide.

then go find it and tell us what it is exactly
but don't expect issa to help. he has proven that he could not find his butt with both hands
 
Grab a mirror.

If there was nothing there then there is no reason for her to take the 5th. The fact that she took the 5th shows that there is something to hide.

Take the 5th out of the Constitution then.
And give us back our $14 million.
And only allow one party to speak at ISSA's hearings, which will backfire in the elections .
 
I$$A lied to Chris Wallace on Sunday.
Why are Democrats not allowed to speak at ISSA's kangaroo court?
Americans are embarrassed at what ISSA did, unplugging the sound system .
You speak for "Americans" now.
 
I$$A lied to Chris Wallace on Sunday.
Why are Democrats not allowed to
speak at ISSA's kangaroo court?
Americans are embarrassed at what ISSA did, unplugging the sound system .


Yes, ignore the fact that the women who acknowledged targeting back in 2012 an d then tried to pin it on a couple of low level employeds just took the 5 th for the 23rd time.

Hey, its just a Kangaroo Court. So why is she taking the Fifth ?
 
If it's a faux scandal why did she plead the 5th?

One has to define "scandal". Recently, the use of the word scandal has been used to refrence knowledge and participation of the President and his admistration.

It can be a faux sandal and still actions being unlawful. Ms Lerner still has the right not in any way to give testamony which may be used agaisnt her in a court of law.
 
Take the 5th out of the Constitution then.
And give us back our $14 million.
And only allow one party to speak at ISSA's hearings, which will backfire in the elections .

Lerner, a member of the other party, had the opportunity to speak and she didn't take it.
Democrats lost this next election not the other way around. Who in their right mind would vote Democrat after the **** they put us through?
 
Is this her right, or is it only reserved for Republicans such as in ChristieGate?
Why does ISSA embarrass the GOP and the Nation ?
Lerner, the Main Democrat we cared about, had all the opportunity to speak and she refused to do so.
 
Is this her right, or is it only reserved for Republicans such as in ChristieGate?
Why does ISSA embarrass the GOP and the Nation ?
Don't complain about the Democrats not having the opportunity to speak when they choose not to speak by using the 5th amendment to cover their asses. You can't have it both ways.
 
After the garbage that Americans saw today from Dear Leader ISSA, you go on thinking your side won. :lamo:lamo
Lerner, a member of the other party, had the opportunity to speak and she didn't take it.
Democrats lost this next election not the other way around. Who in their right mind would vote Democrat after the **** they put us through?
 
Silencing Americans, especially the lead Democrat on the committee, does make a difference.
Glad to know where you stand, with silencing the masses .
That would be accurate if Cummings actually knew the truth. He doesn't. So silencing him makes no difference.
 
You want to silence Americans, such as all the Democrats on the committee.
what does that make you ?
You speak for "Americans" now.
 
Democrats on the committee were not testifying.
Do you not know the difference between DEM committee members and Lerner?:lamo
Do you have Lerner guilty as I$$A does and now you need the evidence ?
Don't complain about the Democrats not having the opportunity to speak when they choose not to speak by using the 5th amendment to cover their asses. You can't have it both ways.
 
they are looking at contempt charges. she lost her right to plead the 5th when she made a statement in the last hearing. they want immunity but i think not pressing a contempt charge is good leverage.

of course as the saying goes if she didn't do anything wrong then she has nothing to hide and should be willing to testify. in order to clear her name. i know i would.
 
lerner testified because she was compelled by issa to do so
and you term that democrat driven theatre. your characterization is stunningly off the mark

issa ended the committee hearing after inviting cumings to ask a question but before allowing him to do so
such an indication the republicans' intent is to get the truth out

Lerner's attorney had sent Issa a response indicating that she would testify.
 
of course as the saying goes if she didn't do anything wrong then she has nothing to hide and should be willing to testify. in order to clear her name. i know i would.

Did you give this same advice to candidate Christie's people ?
 
Lerner's attorney had sent Issa a response indicating that she would testify.

and she did testify
only not as issa had hoped ... too bad he earlier misrepresented to the press what to expect in the form of her testimony. but that speaks to his double digit IQ
issa took a **** in the pool he was swimming in
 
Silencing Americans, especially the lead Democrat on the committee, does make a difference.
Glad to know where you stand, with silencing the masses .
Please. Drop the drama.
 
Back
Top Bottom