"If you can't stand the way this place is, Take yourself to higher places!"
Break, By Three days grace
Hilliary Clinton/Tim Kaine 2016
I see it as no problem, each network, Fox and MSNBC play to their audience. I think personally CNN when it comes to cable news is probably the one with the least bias. But this is just one man's opinion. I do know however, Democrats hate Fox and Republicans hate MSNBC. I guess that is par for the course as neither side want any news reported that reflect bad on their party.
Early voting in Georgia. On the 20th of October this old Goldwater conservative voted against both Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton by casting my vote for Gary Johnson. Neither Trump or Clinton belong within a million miles of the Oval Office.
AUSTAN GOOLSBEE: I think the world vests too much power, certainly in the president, probably in Washington in general for its influence on the economy, because most all of the economy has nothing to do with the government.
Fox News does not attack liberals, though some of its commentators might. There are also commentators from the left who appear regularly to counter their arguments.
But this has nothing to do with the Clarence Thomas hearings when the MSM did cover that issue live throughout most of the day, contrary to how they now cover the Lerner/IRS case. The latter is far more important than anything Anita Hill had to say, which was a shameful public lynching by the MSM.
Oh I do just fine, but thanks for your concern...See, when I made the statement that upset you, you were talking about following "evidence", and much has been pointed out how this whole IRS thing was partisan in nature, and has failed to be investigated to satisfaction by the people that are supposed to investigate on the peoples behalf. And as investigations go, this one is almost as funny as you proclaiming that there is no evidence of wrongdoing, when all that has been done is stonewalling, and obfuscation by the administration.But I do wish I could get you to follow the arguments.
This investigation is slowly creeping to a halt in dead end not because there is nothing there, but rather because liberal progressives have closed ranks, and feckless republican leadership doesn't have the fortitude to institute a joint select committee.
We know that Lerner has a track record of identical actions from when she was with the FEC. We know that leading up to this that there are some real questions out there that remain, and may never be answered. They are as follows.
1. Lois Lerner’s apology was a spontaneous reaction to an unexpected question from an unknown audience member. In fact, the question came from tax lawyer and lobbyist Celia Roady. Ms. Roady has some interesting career highlights: She was part of the 1997 ethics investigation of Newt Gingrich, but, more to the point, she was appointed to the IRS’s Advisory Council on Tax-Exempt and Government Entities by IRS commissioner Douglas Shulman. She is a longtime colleague of Lerner, who is director of tax-exempt organizations. Ms. Roady has declined to comment on whether her question was planted, but it obviously was. The IRS had contacted reporters and encouraged them beforehand to attend the otherwise un-newsworthy event, and it had an entire team of press handlers on hand. So what we have is the staged rollout of what turns out to be — given the rest of this list — a disinformation campaign.
2. This was the work of low-level grunts in Cincinnati. In truth, very senior people within the IRS, including its top lawyer, were aware of the situation, and had been since at least 2011. The home office in Washington was very much involved in the process.
3. Lerner says that the situation came to her attention through allegations from tea-party groups carried in media reports. In fact, the matter has been under both internal and external investigation for some time.
4. Lerner says she put an end to the practice as soon as she found out about it. In fact, the IRS continued to do precisely the same thing, only monkeying a little bit with the language: Instead of targeting “tea party” groups explicitly, it targeted those groups with an interest in such esoterica as limited government, the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, etc.
5. She says that the commissioner of the IRS didn’t know about the targeting project. While the targeting was going on, Ms. Lerner’s boss was being asked some very pointed questions by Congress on the subject of targeting tea-party groups. He enthusiastically denied that any such thing was going on, in direct contravention of the facts. Ms. Lerner says he didn’t know about the situation, because it was confined to those aforementioned plebs in Cincinnati. But given that this was not the case, her explaining away the commissioner’s untrue statements to Congress is a lie based on another lie — a compound lie, if you will. And acting commissioner Steven Miller was briefed on the situation in May of 2012 — and then declined to share his knowledge of it with Congress when asked about it during a hearing in July 2013.
6. Lerner says she came forward with her apology unprompted by any special consideration. In fact, an inspector general’s report was about to be released, making the matter public.
7. When Congress was investigating complaints from conservative groups, Lerner told them that she could not release information about organizations with pending applications. But her group was in fact releasing such information — to the left-leaning news organization ProPublica, rather than to congressional investigators. (during an election campaign)
8. Lerner says that there was no political pressure to investigate tea-party groups. In fact, Senator Carl Levin (D., Mich.) repeatedly pressed the agency to investigate conservative groups falling under Lerner’s jurisdiction. What we have, then, is this: Under a Democratic administration, the IRS was under pressure from Democratic elected officials to investigate political enemies of the Democratic party. The agency did so. Its commissioner lied to Congress about its doing so. When the inspector general’s report was about to make these abuses public, the agency staged a classic Washington Friday news rollout at a sleepy American Bar Association tax-law conference, hoping to minimize the bad publicity. Lerner lied to the public about the nature, scope, and extent of the IRS intimidation campaign.
The Nine Lies of Lois Lerner | National Review Online
Now you may not like the facts Joe, but as I see it, if this were any Republican President in office we were talking about, at the very least Fitzgerald would have been told to dust off his wingtips, and get out there in front of the camera in a snap....Obama gets to slide? why?
Obama used the IRS as a weapon against his political opponents, and Lerner wants no part of admitting this. It's painfully obvious that this is the case.
And since you're obviously concerned with privacy you must be guilty. Heck, we don't even need a trial.
Then, evidence shows that that power was used to intimidate and alter the election process, and you think she should be allowed to just clam up?