I do not appreciate the tone nor the words of your post.
I have been nothing if not civil with you. Your insults clearly demonstrate that your argument is completely without merit, denies the facts as presented. To deny that corruption has not been unveiled in the face of Lerner's sworn testimony is an egregious a a deliberate attempt to deceive.
Clearly, your comments cannot be taken as anything other than comic relief. The record is clear, the law was broken and your attempts at denial are as trustworthy as "If you like your plan, you can keep your plan.
Thank you for your participation in the debate, but sir, insults do not win arguments and clearly that is all you have in you arsenal of wits.
Please do take offense at this. Perhaps in the future you might try to be a better example of American Democrats, as this display illustrates the absolute vacuum of morals in the party.
For the record I am in no way partisan, not a member of the Republican Party, not a tea bagger, and in fact a member of the Liberal Party of Canada. The decline of your nation is a matter of record.
"Small people talk about people, average people talk about events, great people talk about ideas" Eleanor Roosevelt
You can never be safe from a government that can keep you completely safe from each other and the world. You must choose.
Lerner has a history of harassment back when she was part of the FEC.
Lerner made a public acknowledgement that Conservative groups had been targeted.
IRS apologizes for targeting conservative groupsWASHINGTON — The Internal Revenue Service apologized Friday for subjecting Tea Party groups to additional scrutiny during the 2012 election, but denied any political motive.
Lois Lerner, who heads the IRS unit that oversees tax-exempt groups, said organizations that included the words "tea party" or "patriot" in their applications for tax-exempt status were singled out for additional reviews. Her remarks, which came at an American Bar Association gathering, were first reported by the Associated Press.
The first question one should ask is "Why is there a need for an apology if there was no wrong doing?"
The apology came on the heels of Congress investigating due to complaints they had received by constituents over delays also with documentation of numerous inappropriate questionnaires these groups were receiving from the IRS.
Lerner has been before Congress twice and both times took the Fifth. Today she just re-affirmed her guilt. You have to ask yourself, if you have nothing to hide, if no wrong-doing was committed, if there isn’t even a “smidgen of corruption” as President Obama famously declared in a Super Bowl Sunday in his interview with Bill O’Reilly, then why won’t Lerner talk without the protection of immunity?