Now, I wonder if you really know who Jonathan Turley really is, given you did not use his full name nor provide a link that outlines his position, but at least you cited a credible source that thinks Obama is playing out of bounds. Bear in mind, however, that Jonathan Turley is an outspoken critic of the imperial presidency. Although he has issues with Obama's use of executive power, he was also a very vocal critic of George W. Bush, also arguing George was way out of bounds on his use of signing statements, executive orders and violations of human rights (torture and detaining of persons without charge and/or trial).
Unlike most people, Jonathan Turley has been consistent on an issue independent party. Its interesting he has suddenly appeared on Fox. Now that he is a liberal blasting Obama, he is a star on Fox. I doubt he ever got the red carpet treatment, much less an invite, when his issues were with GW Bush. That said, Turley has never advocated the impeachment of either Obama nor Bush... he is only questioning the imperial presidency.
To be clear, however, my issue is not with Obama playing out of bounds, its with the outrage of some that feel that he is the only guy that has played out of bounds. The concept of the imperial presidency / unitary executive is not new (see links per my previous post)... I was challenging Anthony to show us how Obama was somehow different.... as I expected, he could not... as its clear that his command of the issue was shallow to non-existent.
Thank you for at least giving us a substantive retort.... after all, this is DEBATE politics. Debate means you bring facts and expert opinion to the table when called to do so. You did so.