Page 58 of 68 FirstFirst ... 8485657585960 ... LastLast
Results 571 to 580 of 679

Thread: Arizona anti-gay bill vetoed by governor

  1. #571
    I'm kind of a big deal

    AGENT J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 02:38 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    44,761

    Re: Arizona anti-gay bill vetoed by governor

    Quote Originally Posted by tech30528 View Post
    Your assertion is factually incorrect.
    actually its 100% factual as his follow up post proved
    facts win again

    seems you views might be exactly the ones he was talking about since this some how offends you
    This space is currently owned by The Great Winchester, stay tuned for future messages!
    Make America Great Again!
    Pro-Equal Rights / Pro-Gun Rights / Pro-Human Rights / Pro-Choice

  2. #572
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    United States
    Last Seen
    01-21-16 @ 12:21 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    51,124

    Re: Arizona anti-gay bill vetoed by governor

    Quote Originally Posted by AGENT J View Post
    nope never said the BILL was about equality
    Then we agree that equality had nothing to do with anything other than propaganda and you retract and apologize for your "equality wins again" hyperbole in your OP.

    I accept your apology and appreciate that you will ask the mods to edit your OP to remove that miss-statement as a demonstration of your personal integrity and character.
    Thank you

  3. #573
    I'm kind of a big deal

    AGENT J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 02:38 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    44,761

    Re: Arizona anti-gay bill vetoed by governor

    Quote Originally Posted by Jerry View Post
    Then we agree that equality never had nothing to do with anything other than propaganda and you retract and apologize for your "equality wins again" hyperbole in your OP.

    I accept your apology and appreciate that you will ask the mods to edit your OP to remove that miss-statement as a demonstration of your personal integrity and character.
    Thank you
    no we just agree that your statement was wrong and it factually was

    equality did win facts wont change

    this has nothing to do with the bill or why it was written or why it failed

    facts win again
    This space is currently owned by The Great Winchester, stay tuned for future messages!
    Make America Great Again!
    Pro-Equal Rights / Pro-Gun Rights / Pro-Human Rights / Pro-Choice

  4. #574
    Mixed Government advocate
    Master PO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    93,000,000 miles from Earth where its very Hot
    Last Seen
    11-30-17 @ 01:52 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    31,331

    Re: Arizona anti-gay bill vetoed by governor

    Quote Originally Posted by AGENT J View Post
    1.) again none here
    2.) 100% false if its based on the wrong thing it violates rights and the law
    3.) could thing that factually isnt happening

    tell me what you think this thread is about

    its NOT about solely denying service
    its NOT about solely discrimaintion

    do you know what its about?
    1 i stated government cannot use force / coercion on citizens if no rights violation has taken place.
    2. as stated above government has no authority to act on you if you have not violated rights or violation health and saftey of the people.
    3 discrimination of a patron violates no right's
    4 if government uses coercion, telling you ,they will put you out of business because you refuse service to people, and to stay in business to must do things against your will, like serving people you do not wish to serve...that is involuntary servitude.

  5. #575
    I'm kind of a big deal

    AGENT J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 02:38 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    44,761

    Re: Arizona anti-gay bill vetoed by governor

    Quote Originally Posted by ernst barkmann View Post
    1 i stated government cannot use force / coercion on citizens if no rights violation has taken place.
    2. as stated above government has no authority to act on you if you have not violated rights or violation health and saftey of the people.
    3 discrimination of a patron violates no right's
    4 if government uses coercion, telling you ,they will put you out of business because you refuse service to people, and to stay in business to must do things against your will, like serving people you do not wish to serve...that is involuntary servitude.
    1.) i agree 100%
    2.) I agree 100%
    3.) I agree 100%
    4.) good thing thats factually not happening



    tell me what you think this thread is about

    its NOT about solely denying service
    its NOT about solely discrimaintion

    do you know what its about?
    This space is currently owned by The Great Winchester, stay tuned for future messages!
    Make America Great Again!
    Pro-Equal Rights / Pro-Gun Rights / Pro-Human Rights / Pro-Choice

  6. #576
    Educator Soupnazi630's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Ohio
    Last Seen
    11-08-14 @ 09:54 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    855

    Re: Arizona anti-gay bill vetoed by governor

    Quote Originally Posted by AGENT J View Post
    1.) yes it was not only insane it was bat**** insane and i say that as a religious person, this bill was mentally inane and retarded lol
    2.) im sure you believe that
    3.) yes you have that opinion
    Not opinion but fact and it was not insane.

    There is nothing insane about protecting peoples rights

  7. #577
    I'm kind of a big deal

    AGENT J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 02:38 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    44,761

    Re: Arizona anti-gay bill vetoed by governor

    Quote Originally Posted by Soupnazi630 View Post
    Not opinion but fact and it was not insane.
    2.) There is nothing insane about protecting peoples rights
    1.) nope just your opinion
    2.) rights would have been violated
    This space is currently owned by The Great Winchester, stay tuned for future messages!
    Make America Great Again!
    Pro-Equal Rights / Pro-Gun Rights / Pro-Human Rights / Pro-Choice

  8. #578
    Educator Soupnazi630's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Ohio
    Last Seen
    11-08-14 @ 09:54 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    855

    Re: Arizona anti-gay bill vetoed by governor

    Quote Originally Posted by AGENT J View Post
    1.) nope just your opinion
    2.) rights would have been violated
    1 absolute fact not opinion you do not grasp the difference but you are still wrong.

    2 not one persons rights would have been violated

  9. #579
    I'm kind of a big deal

    AGENT J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 02:38 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    44,761

    Re: Arizona anti-gay bill vetoed by governor

    Quote Originally Posted by Soupnazi630 View Post
    1 absolute fact not opinion you do not grasp the difference but you are still wrong.
    2.) not one persons rights would have been violated
    1.) nope just your opinion and nothing else lMAO
    yes i understand the difference this is why i recognize what your opinion is
    2.) 100% factually false it would have temporarily empowered and allowed illegal discrimination until it got taken to court and thrown out
    This space is currently owned by The Great Winchester, stay tuned for future messages!
    Make America Great Again!
    Pro-Equal Rights / Pro-Gun Rights / Pro-Human Rights / Pro-Choice

  10. #580
    Educator Soupnazi630's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Ohio
    Last Seen
    11-08-14 @ 09:54 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    855

    Re: Arizona anti-gay bill vetoed by governor

    Quote Originally Posted by AGENT J View Post
    1.) nope just your opinion and nothing else lMAO
    yes i understand the difference this is why i recognize what your opinion is
    2.) 100% factually false it would have temporarily empowered and allowed illegal discrimination until it got taken to court and thrown out
    Illegal discrimination is the violation of people's rights.

    No one has the right to demand trade with another.

    So you are proven wrong I stated fact which fail to graswp and you cannot name one person who would have had their right's violated

    You are dismissed to go study

Page 58 of 68 FirstFirst ... 8485657585960 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •