Women (Nasty or otherwise) are going to be the reason that Donald Trump is NEVER President!
First, I don't know anybody who claims to be a bigoted Christian. You know where I see bigotry? Where non Christians paint all Christians as bigots. You saying they are doesn't make it so. In fact, it makes you look like the bigot. We're not talking about people wanted to be treated fairly and with dignity, we're talking about a small percentage of the population wanted to be treated as a protected special class while CLAIMING they want equality. If you wanted equality you would be happy to be treated like everybody else. But at the same time, you are bigoted and narrow minded. Equality in this case would be being treated the same way you treat others. If you were treated by others as you treat them you would be upset. The bill was not about a cake, it was about people not being forced to act against their religious beliefs. Once again, a bill that was supposed to protect religious beliefs was turned in to something that was against the gay community. The two are not mutually exclusive. The problem is that you are so self centered that everything is about you. It's not. Go ahead, keep pointing the finger at others and insisting they are out to get you, and see how long it takes for them to get tired of ignoring your punk ass and turn around and stomp it. Just like Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton and the NAACP, you are escalating a small problem into something bigger than it needs to be to suit your own selfish agenda. Grow up. The world does not revolve around you no matter how special you think you are.
Last edited by tech30528; 02-27-14 at 02:01 PM.
No, I'm suggesting that if there is no harm there can be no right violation, and if there is no right violation there is no justification for the government to act. Oh, and no, feeling is not a harm. Jesus..This will inevitably bring up your second excuse, "the free market with fix it". No it won't, if it would, it would have in the 50's and 60's. Instead we had to have government intervene and say racial discrimination is not allowed.
Liberals talk of treating people equally, but what about the business owner? Did they forgot they are human beings too?
When federal judges start basing their opinions on "hurt feelings" as in the case of the Colorado baker, over constitutional law something is very wrong and should be challenged.
This is much more that religious rights, but the violation of expression of free speech and property rights. For what is the purpose of the First Amendment if it is not going to protect all? Sexual Orientation discrimination laws need to be defined in the originalist view of the Constitution. Not some living breathing rendition that anyone can make it to mean whatever they want it to.