• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

FBI: Men tried to buy bombs for government attack

NOT in this thread. This one is supposed to be about right wing gun nuts thinking they can start a new revolution by attacking innocent people.

Why are those who call themselves "Independent" or Libertarian or Conservative unable or unwilling to discuss matters when it is shown that some folks with similar political leanings are freakin' insane? Is it because of a tendency to smear all Progressives, Liberals and Socialists when an individual or small group calling itself Leftist commits a crime?

It's just the one poster (well, more than one). Let's not tar the reputation of honest and reliable Conservatives on this board by lumping them in with this waste of bandwidth.
 
It's just the one poster (well, more than one). Let's not tar the reputation of honest and reliable Conservatives on this board by lumping them in with this waste of bandwidth.

You are right (er - correct). I just did the very thing I accused the other guys of doing. I should have written "Why are SOME OF those who call themselves "Independent" or Libertarian or Conservative unable or unwilling to discuss matters ..."
 
You'll find a way to weasel out of anything. Still can't bring yourself to admit that the right supported Pinochet, Mubarak, and Hussein who were totalitarian leaders.

Over 44% of the Chilean people supported Pinochet in a national election after he resigned. That's more than those who now support Barrack Obama.

Right and left leaders supported Mubarak and Hussein only when they served their purpose. What did you expect?
 
NOT in this thread. This one is supposed to be about right wing gun nuts thinking they can start a new revolution by attacking innocent people.

Why are those who call themselves "Independent" or Libertarian or Conservative unable or unwilling to discuss matters when it is shown that some folks with similar political leanings are freakin' insane? Is it because of a tendency to smear all Progressives, Liberals and Socialists when an individual or small group calling itself Leftist commits a crime?

Has it been established that those charged are 'freakin' insane' or even 'right wing'?
 
NOT in this thread. This one is supposed to be about right wing gun nuts thinking they can start a new revolution by attacking innocent people.

So then, what is your proof that they are 'right wing'? I saw nothing in the article you provided in the OP where they made any statement on their politics.
 
Over 44% of the Chilean people supported Pinochet in a national election after he resigned. That's more than those who now support Barrack Obama.

Right and left leaders supported Mubarak and Hussein only when they served their purpose. What did you expect?

Well you maintain your record of being consistently wrong when discussing the President. RealClearPolitics - Election Other - President Obama Job Approval
Funny thing I noticed, Rasmussen Reports, generally a bit biased in favour of the right has the President at 51% approval numbers.
 
Well you maintain your record of being consistently wrong when discussing the President. RealClearPolitics - Election Other - President Obama Job Approval
Funny thing I noticed, Rasmussen Reports, generally a bit biased in favour of the right has the President at 51% approval numbers.

As we can see the numbers now have him hovering in the 40's but, in any case, Pinochet was in the same ball park as Obama in a fair and honest election AFTER he was dictator. The Left hates Pinochet because he got rid of a Castro supported coup. The Left has always supported Castro, Guevara and the rest. The Chilean people didn't want that.

Presidential Approval Ratings -- Barack Obama | Gallup Historical Data & Trends
 
Over 44% of the Chilean people supported Pinochet in a national election after he resigned. That's more than those who now support Barrack Obama.

Which doesn't address what I said. He was totalitarian, and right-wing.

(PS, the thread's not about Obama)
 
So then, what is your proof that they are 'right wing'? I saw nothing in the article you provided in the OP where they made any statement on their politics.
Hmm.....I'm sure there are a lot of left wing Georgia militia members, but if you are a betting man....I'll accept your wager.
 
NOT in this thread. This one is supposed to be about right wing gun nuts thinking they can start a new revolution by attacking innocent people.

Why are those who call themselves "Independent" or Libertarian or Conservative unable or unwilling to discuss matters when it is shown that some folks with similar political leanings are freakin' insane? Is it because of a tendency to smear all Progressives, Liberals and Socialists when an individual or small group calling itself Leftist commits a crime?

Attacking innocent people is why some of us that would otherwise support their view believe them to be nuts and idiots.

Insane is also defined as doing the same thing over and over expecting different results. By that definition, all socialist are provable to be insane.
 
Hmm.....I'm sure there are a lot of left wing Georgia militia members, but if you are a betting man....I'll accept your wager.

It's pretty simple, all you have to do is show where they said they were members of any militia, or right wing...I'll wait...
 
So then, what is your proof that they are 'right wing'? I saw nothing in the article you provided in the OP where they made any statement on their politics.

I haven't heard of any left-wing "militia" groups in the US, have you? It is the radical 2nd Amendment movement which constantly quotes that part of the text - you know, the "well-regulated militia" words. Although most of them seem to ignore the "well regulated" bit.
 
Attacking innocent people is why some of us that would otherwise support their view believe them to be nuts and idiots.

Insane is also defined as doing the same thing over and over expecting different results. By that definition, all socialist are provable to be insane.

OK - off topic, but would you say the Scandinavian nations are insane?
 
It's pretty simple, all you have to do is show where they said they were members of any militia, or right wing...I'll wait...

from the OP's linked source
"Cannon claimed too many militias were in a defensive mode and in order to get them out of the defensive posture, actions would have to take place to force martial law to be declared," the agent's statement said. Cannon also said he wanted to recruit militia members from other parts of the country to join these missions.
 
Hmm.....I'm sure there are a lot of left wing Georgia militia members, but if you are a betting man....I'll accept your wager.
Just for the sake of argument, what if they were say agnostic libertarians who support free markets and free sex. Would that make them right wing or left wing?
 
I haven't heard of any left-wing "militia" groups in the US, have you? It is the radical 2nd Amendment movement which constantly quotes that part of the text - you know, the "well-regulated militia" words. Although most of them seem to ignore the "well regulated" bit.


LOL, so you can't point to what I asked you because you made it up...And to answer your question, yes I have heard of Left wing militia's in America....Surely you've heard of the New Black Panthers?
 
OK - off topic, but would you say the Scandinavian nations are insane?

Are they actually socialist? Do they not participate in a global market economy? Would they be able to sustain themselves at their current standard of living and technology without the influx of money and technology from that market economy? If their population expands beyond the income that their sale of a natural resource brings in, would the be sustainable?
 
It's pretty simple, all you have to do is show where they said they were members of any militia, or right wing...I'll wait...
Hmmm...sounds like they were not new to the whole militia thingy...


"Cannon claimed too many militias were in a defensive mode and in order to get them out of the defensive posture, actions would have to take place to force martial law to be declared," the agent's statement said. Cannon also said he wanted to recruit militia members from other parts of the country to join these missions.

Read more here: ATLANTA: FBI: Men tried to buy bombs for government attack | Nation | Macon.com

I'm still waiting on any sort of wager from you.....or are you locked into a "they are NOT right wing"?

If so, when I or anyone else show they are in fact right wing....what will you do?
 
Cherry pick much?

From your link...

No I don't cherry pick or maybe I do with your understanding of this language we each use for communication.

The statement I answered by posting the RCP link had specifically said the President's approval numbers were lower than those of Pinochet. The poster didn't say the "same as"
 
LOL, so you can't point to what I asked you because you made it up...And to answer your question, yes I have heard of Left wing militia's in America....Surely you've heard of the New Black Panthers?

Thats the first name that popped into my head when I read his post.
 
Back
Top Bottom