Page 93 of 122 FirstFirst ... 43839192939495103 ... LastLast
Results 921 to 930 of 1212

Thread: Arizona lawmakers pass controversial anti-gay bill[W:451:959]

  1. #921
    Sage

    ocean515's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Southern California
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    24,705

    Re: Arizona lawmakers pass controversial anti-gay bill[W:451]

    Quote Originally Posted by CriticalThought View Post
    What loopholes? Same sex marriage is not legal in Arizona. There are no discrimination protections for gays in Arizona. This law broadly opens up the potential for using religion to bash any group. If anything, this law CREATES loopholes.
    Hmmm. Well according to what I've read, including a synopsis in the radical left Los Angeles Times, the new legislation was created in response to a decision in New Mexico, which potentially created a loophole in the application of existing law in Arizona. I've posted the link previously. Perhaps you can point out where the Los Angeles Times got it wrong.

  2. #922
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Last Seen
    07-19-17 @ 03:51 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    60,458

    Re: Arizona lawmakers pass controversial anti-gay bill

    Quote Originally Posted by prometeus View Post
    Again no, you are free to tell me anything you want, that however doe not mean it is the truth.
    I noticed that you never told me where I endorsed discrimination when I asked for you to do so.

    Ok, I'll bite. Describe the hypocrisy.
    I already did. Do you need the post number?

  3. #923
    Sage
    CriticalThought's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Last Seen
    Today @ 10:17 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    18,136

    Re: Arizona lawmakers pass controversial anti-gay bill[W:451]

    Quote Originally Posted by ocean515 View Post
    Hmmm. Well according to what I've read, including a synopsis in the radical left Los Angeles Times, the new legislation was created in response to a decision in New Mexico, which potentially created a loophole in the application of existing law in Arizona. I've posted the link previously. Perhaps you can point out where the Los Angeles Times got it wrong.
    Hmmm. Let me get this straight. New Mexico, which has an anti discrimination law which names sexual orientation as a protected class, had an incident where a same sex couple was discriminated against and they brought that issue to court. And somehow that creates a loophole in Arizona which has no anti discrimination law for sexual orientation?

  4. #924
    Sage

    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Over the edge...
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 09:15 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    14,208

    Re: Arizona lawmakers pass controversial anti-gay bill

    Quote Originally Posted by Henrin View Post
    I noticed that you never told me where I endorsed discrimination when I asked for you to do so.
    The endorsement of a clearly bigoted law is a strong indication.

    I already did. Do you need the post number?
    You claimed it was but did not explain it, please do so.

  5. #925
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Last Seen
    07-19-17 @ 03:51 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    60,458

    Re: Arizona lawmakers pass controversial anti-gay bill

    Quote Originally Posted by prometeus View Post
    The endorsement of a clearly bigoted law is a strong indication.
    Then being pro-choice is an indication of your endorsement of abortion. See how stupid you're being yet?

    You claimed it was but did not explain it, please do so.
    I did explain it. Look back in the thread.

  6. #926
    Sage

    ocean515's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Southern California
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    24,705

    Re: Arizona lawmakers pass controversial anti-gay bill[W:451]

    Quote Originally Posted by CriticalThought View Post
    Hmmm. Let me get this straight. New Mexico, which has an anti discrimination law which names sexual orientation as a protected class, had an incident where a same sex couple was discriminated against and they brought that issue to court. And somehow that creates a loophole in Arizona which has no anti discrimination law for sexual orientation?
    I guess so. It's not my interpretation. When I see something that the liberal media, along with the usual suspects, is blasting all across the airwaves with the usual objective in mind, I look into it.

    I've used the synopsis of the Los Angeles times as the basis of my observation.

    Arizona businesses already can refuse to serve gays: SB1062 explained - latimes.com

    I think the example of refusing to do business with the Westboro Baptist Church, as described in the LA Times piece, is an interesting and compelling point.

  7. #927
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Theoretical Physics Lab
    Last Seen
    01-06-15 @ 11:06 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    25,120

    Re: Arizona lawmakers pass controversial anti-gay bill[W:451]

    Quote Originally Posted by CriticalThought View Post
    Hmmm. Let me get this straight. New Mexico, which has an anti discrimination law which names sexual orientation as a protected class, had an incident where a same sex couple was discriminated against and they brought that issue to court. And somehow that creates a loophole in Arizona which has no anti discrimination law for sexual orientation?
    It's a preemptive strike.

  8. #928
    Sage
    CriticalThought's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Last Seen
    Today @ 10:17 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    18,136

    Re: Arizona lawmakers pass controversial anti-gay bill[W:451]

    Quote Originally Posted by ocean515 View Post
    I guess so. It's not my interpretation. When I see something that the liberal media, along with the usual suspects, is blasting all across the airwaves with the usual objective in mind, I look into it.

    I've used the synopsis of the Los Angeles times as the basis of my observation.

    Arizona businesses already can refuse to serve gays: SB1062 explained - latimes.com

    I think the example of refusing to do business with the Westboro Baptist Church, as described in the LA Times piece, is an interesting and compelling point.

    I could care less what the LA Times has to say. Arizona was in no way affected legally by the New Mexico decision. That was just an excuse because they knew people would be too lazy to look up the facts.

  9. #929
    Sage

    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Over the edge...
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 09:15 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    14,208

    Re: Arizona lawmakers pass controversial anti-gay bill

    Quote Originally Posted by Henrin View Post
    Then being pro-choice is an indication of your endorsement of abortion.
    No, being pro-choice is being pro-choice since I have zero bias toward the choice made.
    On the other hand being pro a bigoted law is being pro-bigotry. It is quite simple actually if you try to make the decision in an honest fashion.

    See how stupid you're being yet?
    No, but I see how you are.

  10. #930
    He's the most tip top
    Top Cat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Last Seen
    Today @ 07:46 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    22,307

    Re: Arizona lawmakers pass controversial anti-gay bill[W:451]

    Quote Originally Posted by APACHERAT View Post
    A liberal on June 6th, 1944 would be either a neoconservative or a Reagan Democrat today.
    Typical right wing radio nonsense.

Page 93 of 122 FirstFirst ... 43839192939495103 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •