Page 90 of 122 FirstFirst ... 40808889909192100 ... LastLast
Results 891 to 900 of 1212

Thread: Arizona lawmakers pass controversial anti-gay bill[W:451:959]

  1. #891
    Sage

    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Over the edge...
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 08:51 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    14,210

    Re: Arizona lawmakers pass controversial anti-gay bill[W:451]

    Quote Originally Posted by clownboy View Post
    That's nice, but the ADA is on the books and you must restructure the workplace to accomodate workers with disabilities.
    As long as they are capable to do the job, but that is not how you presented your last point.

  2. #892
    Guru
    Mustachio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Minneapolis
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 11:13 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    2,588

    Re: Arizona lawmakers pass controversial anti-gay bill[W:451]

    Quote Originally Posted by clownboy View Post
    So they can refuse to hire the disabled? Who is bigotted now.
    Unless there is somebody here who thinks it make sense to hire a blind person to be a cab driver, I think "pragmatic" is the word.
    A working class hero is something to be

  3. #893
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Last Seen
    07-19-17 @ 03:51 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    60,458

    Re: Arizona lawmakers pass controversial anti-gay bill[W:451]

    Quote Originally Posted by Mustachio View Post
    Unless there is somebody here who thinks it make sense to hire a blind person to be a cab driver, I think "pragmatic" is the word.
    What if the car drives itself and all the person has to do is collect the fees? Then what?

  4. #894
    Sage

    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Over the edge...
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 08:51 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    14,210

    Re: Arizona lawmakers pass controversial anti-gay bill

    Quote Originally Posted by Henrin View Post
    No, I'm not endorsing people discriminate against anyone. Provide prove of your claim that I endorsed discrimination or stop making it.
    Did you not say that the law does not go far enough? Do you or do you not endorse or approve of this law?

    Tell me though, do pro-choice people like yourself endorse abortion?
    I endorse the freedom for every woman to do as she sees fit. I could care less if no woman ever had an abortion or of e every one aborts. I realize that the square peg of your world that you are trying to hammer into the round hole of reality will have to be reshaped, but that is your problem.

  5. #895
    Sage
    clownboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Oregon
    Last Seen
    08-17-16 @ 10:31 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    26,087

    Re: Arizona lawmakers pass controversial anti-gay bill[W:451]

    Quote Originally Posted by Mustachio View Post
    Unless there is somebody here who thinks it make sense to hire a blind person to be a cab driver, I think "pragmatic" is the word.
    It was a tongue in cheek comment regarding throwing around the word, "bigot". If pragmaticism were in practice the bakery in Colorado would never have been required to make a cake for the gay wedding.

  6. #896
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Last Seen
    07-19-17 @ 03:51 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    60,458

    Re: Arizona lawmakers pass controversial anti-gay bill

    Quote Originally Posted by prometeus View Post
    Did you not say that the law does not go far enough? Do you or do you not endorse or approve of this law?
    Yes, I do. Not really, but I suppose I could vote for it. As I said, the law doesn't go far enough.

    I endorse the freedom for every woman to do as she sees fit. I could care less if no woman ever had an abortion or of e every one aborts. I realize that the square peg of your world that you are trying to hammer into the round hole of reality will have to be reshaped, but that is your problem.
    The only way the woman could have the right to abort is due to her right to body sovereignty, which gives her ownership of own person and the right to control her own body. So tell me, why are you selective in your support of property rights?

  7. #897
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Theoretical Physics Lab
    Last Seen
    01-06-15 @ 11:06 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    25,120

    Re: Arizona lawmakers pass controversial anti-gay bill[W:451]

    Quote Originally Posted by clownboy View Post
    It was a tongue in cheek comment regarding throwing around the word, "bigot". If pragmaticism were in practice the bakery in Colorado would never have been required to make a cake for the gay wedding.
    It's only bigotry if straight white males do it. Anyone else, it's "pride and principle".

  8. #898
    Sage
    Gimmesometruth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    US Southwest
    Last Seen
    09-13-17 @ 10:22 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    22,405

    Re: Arizona lawmakers pass controversial anti-gay bill

    Quote Originally Posted by clownboy View Post
    That's recent generation and the source is indeed pop culture.
    Keep on trying to debase the English language, again, the term is over 40 years old....the CONCEPT is ANCIENT.

    The word means nothing clinically and again is not listed ANYWHERE professionally as a medical condition.
    Who was claiming it was?

    Non-sequitur.
    Quote Originally Posted by trouble13 View Post
    If you wanna know why Trumpsters are ignoring you its for the same reason you ignored the KKKs complaints about Obama.
    Quote Originally Posted by Moderate Right View Post
    When it comes down to it, all facts are cherry picked.
    Quote Originally Posted by Bodhisattva View Post
    He didn't say it didn't make sense. He said it is complete nonsense.

  9. #899
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Last Seen
    07-19-17 @ 03:51 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    60,458

    Re: Arizona lawmakers pass controversial anti-gay bill

    Quote Originally Posted by Gimmesometruth View Post
    Who was claiming it was?

    Non-sequitur.
    Pretty much everyone that uses it. If it is not a phobia the term has no purpose being used against anyone.
    Last edited by Henrin; 02-26-14 at 04:26 PM.

  10. #900
    Sage
    Gimmesometruth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    US Southwest
    Last Seen
    09-13-17 @ 10:22 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    22,405

    Re: Arizona lawmakers pass controversial anti-gay bill

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr.Nick View Post
    That has NOTHING to do with law.
    Who said it was?

    WTF is wrong with you?

    Funny part is that homosexuality was a mental disorder and now that many nations let people live off the dole for having mental disorders - it's quite popular now to classify homosexuality as a mental disorder - you know so gays can get subsidies from their European countries that for some odd reason now believe it's a mental disorder.
    Oh...wait....this bit of non-sense.....HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE LAW!!!!....DERP.

    Geez....what a waste of time.
    Quote Originally Posted by trouble13 View Post
    If you wanna know why Trumpsters are ignoring you its for the same reason you ignored the KKKs complaints about Obama.
    Quote Originally Posted by Moderate Right View Post
    When it comes down to it, all facts are cherry picked.
    Quote Originally Posted by Bodhisattva View Post
    He didn't say it didn't make sense. He said it is complete nonsense.

Page 90 of 122 FirstFirst ... 40808889909192100 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •