Dutch Medal count Paralympics Rio 17 gold 19 silver 26 bronze
BLADE BABE STRIKES AGAIN!!!
the rest of the charges still stay regardless of the murder charge either way this guy is going to jail.
the problem in FL and this is that all someone has to say is they feel they were threatened and the defense lawyers convoluted the meaning of the law and why SYG was passed.
the main purpose of the law was to protect innocent people from criminals. that you have the right to walk down the street and defend yourself or someone else from a crime.
it didn't mean that you can shoot whoever you want and claim self defense because they are cussing at you or something else.
i blame the juries and the judges for not clarifying the law and upholding the meaning of the law.
the next case in the same county involves a previous sheirf who shoots a guy over a text message. BEFORE the movie started he was sending a text message. this ex cop gets up and starts a altercation over it (wasn't the first time he did it to another couple as well). i guess the other guy throws a popcorn bag at him and he shot the guy killed him and the bullet hit this guys wifes hand.
he then claims self defense. i am like what? a paper cut? i mean i know how dangerous the death rate of popcorn is.
i am sure that excon will claim that is self defense as well. of course the officer says he was punched in the face but no witnesses even his wife can confirm that this happened.
i didn't see any bruise on the guys face in the news and if he was hit in the face hard enough to have his glasses come off (being 72) there would have been a huge bruise
there is no marks or anything.
And some of those were on the jury.
It obviously wasn't a slam dunk as someone said (at least not to the Jurors, the ones who actually count), nor does there have corroborating evidence as another has indicated the lack of.
The prosecution has to prove their case. Period. The defense does not have to.
And with the circumstantial evidence that what Dunn saw may have been stashed, and the highly suspicious activity of the driver contacting his aunt and her later coming into the area, that circumstantial evidence has some clout.
As such, it is very understandable that he wasn't convicted of such, the prosecution did not prove it to all the jurors.
That is what you do not understand.
Nor do you understand that he was not shooting at them, but at the perceived threat, who was Davis.
He can not be held accountable if he is found not guilty and/or later granted immunity.
The law can not say, you can fire at an immanent threat, but be held accountable for any other unintentional damage caused by you defending yourself. It does not say that.
The immunity is complete. It covers any criminal action arising from your use of that justified force.
So learn the law before speaking about it.
Last edited by Excon; 02-16-14 at 12:05 AM.
"The law is reason, free from passion."
it almost HAD to be some dumbass that thought it was self defense even though there was no corroborating evidence to prove that
I mean unless im missing something
if somebody thought it was manslaughter and the rest thought it was M2 the rest could just agree with the manslaughter right
Im very interested to hear what actually went down, its going to come out
Seriously, kids at a gas station with loud music? If that sets you off, you really need not to own a gun.
When folks get worried about gun ownership - Dunn is the face of that worry. An idiot that cannot control his emotions and doesn't have a clue when to just walk away.