The rest mattered not to the point that you were discussing me.
That is not permitted.
Try to at least learn something here.
She presented no reliable evidence to the contrary.
But since you think she did, what is it you think she presented?
Dunn claimed there was a gun, and that has not been disproved as required. Whether you like it or not, that is the way it works.
But to him, it was. And that is really what matters here.
Two; Nor is he required.
Davis's friends came off as unbelievable and their credibility was shot.
And as previously stated, their actions after the shooting of not calling 911 but getting out and being seen by a witness in what appeared to be stashing something, in connection with the driver calling his aunt instead, and her then coming into the area and the police not searching for four days, all leads to the possibility that the gun actually existed and was stashed.
Nothing I said goes to them ducking. ???
Nothing I said goes to them being in the same vehicle as the threat that was being shot at. ???
You are speaking nonsense.
Prove it by something other than what Dunn said? Wow! Simply wow!
The specificity was pointed out in trial.
She did not have all the information to draw her conclusions. You keep getting told this, yet you continually ignore the realty of it.
It was pointed out in trial. What do you not understand about that?
My statements have been backed up.
It is your imaginative ones that have not, nor can they ever be.