- Joined
- May 6, 2011
- Messages
- 14,697
- Reaction score
- 5,704
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
The first article says "possible hate crime", and the missing evidence (presumably being investigated) is membership in a hate group or possession of hate propaganda.
The second article mentions: "Prosecutors claim the four called it “papi slumping,”. I imagine this is a term used specifically for Hispanics and demonstrates their intention to target someone of a specific race just because they are a "papi". If propaganda can be found demonstrating this "papi slumping", then they are likely to be found guilty.
I think you could have noticed the "possible" in the first one and the implications of "papi slumping" in the second one. The third article notes that it is an on-going investigation. None of the articles are convictions.
What I have told you is true. I will not continue to explain individual articles.
Thank you. That was my point exactly. If it's white on black crime with racial slurs "possible hate crime" is part of the story. If you will notice no such comment was made in the black on white "knock that white boy out" story in the OP. Maybe you are finally getting it.