Because her definition of "coercion" is akin to a guy nudging her shoulder and saying "c'moooooon" or "you'd do it if you loved me". My God, the monster.
Espinosa insists that he coerced her, psychologically and physically, into having sex against her will for most of their three-year relationship. She resisted, told him no, pushed him away.
reference the DOJ definition of rape from my earlier post.
People are turning this into a battle between him and her. I haven't taken a side. I am defending her right to speak up and heard and not immediately dismissed. I find the ease and the immediacy with which she was dismissed here disturbing
"Judge a man by his questions rather than his answers" - Voltaire
"There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow men. True nobility lies in being superior to your former self" -Hemingway