"Judge a man by his questions rather than his answers" - Voltaire
"There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow men. True nobility lies in being superior to your former self" -Hemingway
Obviously she is bitter about a bad relationship, and because she regrets her decision to stay in this bad relationship, she wants to call it "rape" now. That is just nuts.
Fiddling While Rome Burns
Carthago Delenda Est
"I used to roll the dice; see the fear in my enemies' eyes... listen as the crowd would sing, 'now the old king is dead, Long Live the King.'.."
The problem lies in many people who wish to expand the definition. For example no reasonable person would object to a charge of rape if someone were to take advantage of a person who is unconscious. Others however would call it rape if a person is conscious but drunk. If two people are drinking and they have sex which one is the rapist?
Or in the example being discussed here in this thread. A person alleges to have been the victim of rape but will only allude to some vague claim of coercion. Possibly true? Yes! Possibly a lie? Yes !
I'm already gearing up for Finger Vote 2014.
Just for reference, means my post was a giant steaming pile of sarcasm.