• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Rapper DMX vs George Zimmerman in Boxing Ring

According to the evidence.

Wrong.
Zimmerman was an eye witness to what happened.
And the evidence supports his account.
He was also giving his account before he even knew who if any saw what happened.
To even suggest he wasn't telling the truth is ridiculous.

And btw, it was Trayvon who was the clown, a violent clown for attacking a person.




Zimmerman was a lot more than a witness.

He is the man who used his gun and made that incident front page news.

Because he's the guy who profiled, targeted, followed and shot and killed Trayvon Martin.

Maybe he wasn't found guilty of murder, but there's no doubt about the fact that he put the bullet in Trayvon Martin that killed him.
 
Last edited:
According to the evidence.

Wrong.
Zimmerman was an eye witness to what happened. And the evidence supports his account.
He was also giving his account before he even knew who if any saw what happened.
To even suggest he wasn't telling the truth is ridiculous.

And btw, it was Trayvon who was the clown, a violent clown for attacking a person.




What do you call Zimmerman who put a bullet into a 17-year old kid that he couldn't handle and killed him?

How do you describe that guy?
 
They should make it a cage match. And as soon as they put DMX in the cage they should make him wear milkbone underwear and lock him in there with 13 hungry pit bulls. And maybe throw Michael Vick in there too.

That would be poetic justice. DMX didn't even do 1 day in jail for what he did to those dogs.
 
Zimmerman was a lot more than a witness.

He is the man who used his gun and made that incident front page news.
No he didn't.
Instead of focusing on the many deaths that blacks cause blacks, the BGI made it front page News by making a non-racial event racial.


Because he's the guy who profiled, targeted, followed and shot and killed Trayvon Martin.
:naughty
He is the one who spotted a person who was acting suspiciously. That isn't profiling.
He was the person who then called the police on the suspicious person.
He is the one who followed to keep an eye on that suspicious person to point them out to police when they arrived.
He is then the person who was then confronted first by that suspicious person, knocked to the ground by a sucker punch from that suspicious person who then got on top of him and started slamming his head into the ground.
He is the person who called for help several times.
He is the person who then, after all that, when the suspicious person saw his gun and went for it with the stated intent to kill him, he got it first and used it in defense of his life by shooting the suspicious person attacking him, one time.


Maybe he wasn't found guilty of murder, but there's no doubt about the fact that he put the bullet in Trayvon Martin that killed him.
And as we know, it was for a damn good reason.



What do you call Zimmerman who put a bullet into a 17-year old kid that he couldn't handle and killed him?

How do you describe that guy?
Stop being obtuse. You already know he was defending himself against a violent young adult who had been slamming his head into the ground.
 
They should make it a cage match. And as soon as they put DMX in the cage they should make him wear milkbone underwear and lock him in there with 13 hungry pit bulls. And maybe throw Michael Vick in there too.

That would be poetic justice. DMX didn't even do 1 day in jail for what he did to those dogs.

Better yet one of those matches where you can use weapons and such. Tables ladders and chairs.
 
According to the evidence.

Wrong.
Zimmerman was an eye witness to what happened. And the evidence supports his account.
He was also giving his account before he even knew who if any saw what happened.
To even suggest he wasn't telling the truth is ridiculous.

And btw, it was Trayvon who was the clown, a violent clown for attacking a person.

What ???? Dude there is no evidence that says Zimmerman wasn't the aggressor. The only reason he is not in jail right now is because there are no witnesses to account for that time between the start of the altercation and the point where he shot him........... You know what, there is no point trying to have an intelligent conversation with you about this. Just by your comments you appear to be one of "those" whose declared Trayvon guilty just for being "tall". I spent too much energy discussing this case.

Moving on........
 
No he didn't.
Instead of focusing on the many deaths that blacks cause blacks, the BGI made it front page News by making a non-racial event racial.



:naughty
He is the one who spotted a person who was acting suspiciously. That isn't profiling.
He was the person who then called the police on the suspicious person.
He is the one who followed to keep an eye on that suspicious person to point them out to police when they arrived.
He is then the person who was then confronted first by that suspicious person, knocked to the ground by a sucker punch from that suspicious person who then got on top of him and started slamming his head into the ground.
He is the person who called for help several times.
He is the person who then, after all that, when the suspicious person saw his gun and went for it with the stated intent to kill him, he got it first and used it in defense of his life by shooting the suspicious person attacking him, one time.


And as we know, it was for a damn good reason.








Stop being obtuse. You already know he was defending himself against a violent young adult who had been slamming his head into the ground.




That is your ****ed-up opinion, which you are entitled to and a lot of people don't agree with.




I don't wish Mr. Zimmerman any good luck in the boxing ring, or in his future life.

That dude deserves any bad things that happen to him.

He didn't just accidentally happen to be the guy who shot and killed Trayvon Martin.

He put himself in that position.

When he couldn't defend himself against a 17-year old kid in a fist fight that he brought on, with his actions, he shot and killed that kid.






"What goes around, comes around."




There is justice on this planet.

It isn't always delivered as fast as we would like it to be, but eventually those who deserve it usually get the severe ass-whipping that they deserve.

I hope that Mr Zimmerman gets one that he'll never forget soon.
 
Last edited:
That is your ****ed-up opinion, which you are entitled to and a lot of people don't agree with.




I don't wish Mr. Zimmerman any good luck in the boxing ring, or in his future life.

That dude deserves any bad things that happen to him.






"What goes around, comes around."

Exactly. And why do people like this guy use black on black crime as a counter argument?

I have never heard or seen a drive by shooter stay at the crime scene where he just shot some one and claim self defense and the cop didn't arrest them.
 
What ???? Dude there is no evidence that says Zimmerman wasn't the aggressor.
And again. What Zimmerman says is evidence. He stated he wasn't. So yes there is evidence.

Nor is there any account that he was the aggressor.
There is no information to even suggest such.


The only reason he is not in jail right now is because there are no witnesses to account for that time between the start of the altercation and the point where he shot him...........
First of all, you are ignoring eye witness testimony from those who saw partially what was happening in between the start and the finish.

Secondly, you say that is "the only reason", which is nothing more than a complete fabrication. His actions were justified under the law even if he had been the initial aggressor. (Which we already know he wasn't as Trayvon confronted him first in a hostile fashion.)
Secondly, had there been a witness to the initial contact between the two, you have no cause to even think they would have seen anything different than what Zimmerman said happened. None.
So can the bs.


there is no point trying to have an intelligent conversation with you about this.
Because nothing you have stated is intellectual or in concurrence with the evidence.



Just by your comments you appear ...
You appear to disregard the evidence which makes your assertions wrong.
That is a bias that you have displayed.





And as we know, it was for a damn good reason.
That is your ****ed-up opinion, which you are entitled to and a lot of people don't agree with.
:doh
There is no that many people who believe a gun shouldn't be used for self defense.
So you are talking nonsense.
Defending himself from an aggressor is a damn good idea/opinion, whether you agree with it or not.


I don't wish Mr. Zimmerman any good luck in the boxing ring, or in his future life.
That is your ****ed-up opinion, and thereby showing your own bias.


That dude deserves any bad things that happen to him.
That is your ****ed-up opinion, and thereby showing your own bias.


He didn't just accidentally happen to be the guy who shot and killed Trayvon Martin.
Accidentally? :lamo
No, he shot the guy who was a lethal threat to him.
I would hope that was on purpose and not accidentally.


He put himself in that position.
:doh
No he didn't.
He did not ask to be attacked. That was all on Trayvon's part.


When he couldn't defend himself against a 17-year old kid in a fist fight that he brought on, with his actions, he shot and killed that kid.
The evidence says there was no fist fight.
The evidence says that it was an unprovoked attack by someone acting out violently.


The rest of what you said in nothing more than biased bs.
 
Yeaaaah...because in a fight between a responsible gun owner and a black rapper, the former is going to be the first to pull out a gun...

From all the stories about Z brandishing his guns at inappropriate times, I'm not sure I'd call him "responsible."
 
And again. What Zimmerman says is evidence. He stated he wasn't. So yes there is evidence.

Nor is there any account that he was the aggressor.
There is no information to even suggest such.


First of all, you are ignoring eye witness testimony from those who saw partially what was happening in between the start and the finish.

Secondly, you say that is "the only reason", which is nothing more than a complete fabrication. His actions were justified under the law even if he had been the initial aggressor. (Which we already know he wasn't as Trayvon confronted him first in a hostile fashion.)
Secondly, had there been a witness to the initial contact between the two, you have no cause to even think they would have seen anything different than what Zimmerman said happened. None.
So can the bs.


Because nothing you have stated is intellectual or in concurrence with the evidence.




You appear to disregard the evidence which makes your assertions wrong.
That is a bias that you have displayed.





:doh
There is no that many people who believe a gun shouldn't be used for self defense.
So you are talking nonsense.
Defending himself from an aggressor is a damn good idea/opinion, whether you agree with it or not.


That is your ****ed-up opinion, and thereby showing your own bias.


That is your ****ed-up opinion, and thereby showing your own bias.


Accidentally? :lamo
No, he shot the guy who was a lethal threat to him.
I would hope that was on purpose and not accidentally.


:doh
No he didn't.
He did not ask to be attacked. That was all on Trayvon's part.


The evidence says there was no fist fight.
The evidence says that it was an unprovoked attack by someone acting out violently.


The rest of what you said in nothing more than biased bs.




That's your opinion, which you are entitled to and I don't agree with and will therefore ignore.




BTW: did I mention that I hope Zimmerman gets his butt kicked so bad that it makes his nose bleed?

Now maybe we'll find out how Zimmerman's fights turn out when he isn't packing a gun.
 
That's your opinion,
:lamo
That is an opinion based on the evidence coming from your own keyboard.


And that evidence is biased bs posted by you.
 
Healthier and bigger?
No. Someone who is equally as matched, should have been chosen.




Like in his world-famous bout with that 17-year old kid, Trayvon Martin, eh?

That was a mighty fair fight, especially since Zimmerman ended it with a gunshot.
 
Like in his world-famous bout with that 17-year old kid, Trayvon Martin, eh?

That was a mighty fair fight, especially since Zimmerman ended it with a gunshot.
Your ridiculous assertion has already been addressed. There was no fight. Only an attack.
 
:lamo
That is an opinion based on the evidence coming from your own keyboard.


And that evidence is biased bs posted by you.




Hey, I said that you're entitled to your opinion, what more do you want?

I could just as easily have told you to get the heck out of here.

Sometimes I wonder why I waste my time being polite with some people.
 
Your ridiculous assertion has already been addressed.
There was no fight. Only an attack.




I will agree that it certainly wasn't a fair fight, since Zimmerman brought it to an abrupt conclusion with a gunshot.
 
Hey, I said that you're entitled to your opinion, what more do you want?

I could just as easily have told you to get the heck out of here.

Sometimes I wonder why I waste my time being polite with some people.
And I am just pointing out that what you provided was biased bs. As evidenced buy your own postings.
 


I will agree that it certainly wasn't a fair fight, since Zimmerman brought it to an abrupt conclusion with a gunshot.
And again.

There was no fight. Only an attack upon Zimmerman by Trayvon.
Learn the evidence.
 
Like in his world-famous bout with that 17-year old kid, Trayvon Martin, eh?

That was a mighty fair fight, especially since Zimmerman ended it with a gunshot.

Why do you try to start something and find it difficult to follow through?

Z was afraid for his life thus Z did act in self-defense. The jury acquitted Z
 
Why do you try to start something and find it difficult to follow through?

Z was afraid for his life thus Z did act in self-defense. The jury acquitted Z




Let's see who acquits him in the boxing ring.

He may very likely be afraid for his life there.
 
Let's see who acquits him in the boxing ring.

He may very likely be afraid for his life there.

You seem utterly confused with real world events vs fantasy/unreal events
 

If Zimmerman gets in the ring with the right guy he'll end up wishing that it was a fantasy.

The manner in which you are stringing together your bias thoughts.... results in incoherent gibberish
 
The manner in which you are stringing together your bias thoughts.... results in
incoherent gibberish





Incoherent gibberish is probably what will be coming out of Zimmerman's mouth after this upcoming boxing match-if he's still breathing.
 
Back
Top Bottom