• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

George Zimmerman agrees to celebrity boxing match

This will be exploded to bait all issues of race by the scum media proving you are never innocent in the media. The media would not exist if it were not for creating trash. They should have Woody Allen and Tonya Harding doing the blow by blow. The fact that this is even news proves the media is a $#it starter out for money.
 
DiAnna said:
Wonder if he'll be able to "stand is ground" without the comfort of packing a weapon, or if he'll cry like a little girl the first time he gets punched in the nose, like he did the last time.
Click to expand...

It'll be weird for him to punch something that is not female, too. Wow, no gun, no woman... this match is going to be pretty foreign to him.
 
Middleground said:
It'll be weird for him to punch something that is not female, too. Wow, no gun, no woman... this match is going to be pretty foreign to him.
Click to expand...

Wow!
What a ridiculous thing to say.
 
Rainman05 said:
Dude. Nobody is denying that he killed a kid. Nobody. So what you are saying is a mute point. It makes no sense in saying it. If that's all ur gonna say, don't bother saying it. It goes without saying.

The thing that people are disagreeing upon is whether he is GUILTY OF MURDER or not. That's the issue that intelligent people tried to discuss with emotional people. Emotional people screamed YES because they have no understanding of how the legal system works, intelligent people argued that the court decides who is guilty and let the court and the jury decide. Because that's how civilization works.

The nature of self-defense is a situation where one must take actions to defend himself against a threat. He could have not ended up in a situation where he had to defend himself, but that's like... you know... not what happened. And you can't rewrite the past or make a time machine and go back... so... yeah. We can't discuss on hypotheticals, only on what was established. The fact that people are still looking out for blood after the whole thing was resolved legally, is a sign of stupidity and racism.
Click to expand...

No. Some of us think that he might simply be one of the biggest kinds of assholes and still might not be guilty of murder.
 
Rainman05 said:
read their statements. I have to constantly repeat myself. Here, let me make it easy for you. Since it's clear that at least 3-4 people in this thread are illiterate.

And now The Game, who has an image of Martin tattooed on his leg, tells TMZ he would definitely jump into the ring with Zimmerman: "I will beat the f--- out of him ... I would not be boxing for me. I'd be boxing for the legacy of Trayvon Martin and for his family."

"I would box him to knock him out," The Game continues. "I would definitely take pleasure in it. It's legal, and I want to show him you can solve your disputes without a weapon."

DMX also talked to TMZ, saying that he hopes to step into the ring with Zimmerman to fight for "every black person who has been done wrong in the (legal) system."

Vigilantiism.



that's not the point. You keep dodging the question because the truth would hurt your little "progressive" which is actually regressive view.

If you look at the statements both rappers made, they clearly see themselves as vigilantees and out to get zimmerman for black people who've been failed by the system. That, is racism. One of them has a trayvon martin tatoo on his leg. If people make tatoos of underrage children, them being adults, it's either they're stupid or pedophiles. I think he's both.



Look at what they're saying. I posted what they were saying half a dozen times. If you can't read, that's not my fault.



I will redirect you to read their statements.
I have already said it. It's not the event itself that is vigilantiism, it's the 2 rappers who wanna participate that are vigilantes. It's the statements of the 2 racists. They won't go in that ring to fight for charity, that's just zimmerman, he's the hero. they wanna go in there for vengeance, for retribution because of race.
Click to expand...

How is that vigilantism? Vigilantism is when someone goes and take the law into their own hands. This is not happening here.
 
Middleground said:
It'll be weird for him to punch something that is not female, too. Wow, no gun, no woman... this match is going to be pretty foreign to him.
Click to expand...

the real question here is who will he sucker for more money: his empty-headed haters or his slow-witted supporters.
 
Dr. Chuckles said:
the real question here is who will he sucker for more money: his empty-headed haters or his slow-witted supporters.
Click to expand...

I'm sure millions of dumbasses will tune in. All the while Trayvon rolls in his grave.
 
MaggieD said:
Charity's a fine idea. A soup kitchen would be nice. It's another example of some poor decision-making in my mind. Reminds me of Tonya Harding.
Click to expand...

Can he box her?
 
EMNofSeattle said:
He should become a spokesman for godaddy.com, or spirit airlines, those two people seem to love controversial advertising....

"now offering non stop, "Obama's Son special" direct from Reagan National to Miami, only 80 dollars coach, skittles complementary"
Click to expand...

He can do the next Pistacios commercial. :lamo

Why is it I can picture him boxing with Psy?

Boxing Gangnam style. It could be a win win for both of them!
 
Middleground said:
I'm sure millions of dumbasses will tune in. All the while Trayvon rolls in his grave.
Click to expand...

I think we both know you'll be one of those tuning in so you can hurl pointless insults at the screen.
 
I would love to see the fight and would pay money to do so.
 
Advertisers would pay the fare to have this on tv as it would attract viewers like a car wreck along the freeway does.

But who it their right mind would pay their own hard earn money watch a couple celebs dance in the ring??


Navy Pride said:
I would love to see the fight and would pay money to do so.
Click to expand...
 
Middleground said:
Again, I have to add... It's really ****ing amazing how much you assume. Are you ever right about anything?
Click to expand...

No, just when i point to the obvious
 
You didn't answer his questions and went into the same rant. Why are you calling the guys racist? They aren't MLK, but that has nothing to do with providing rational explanation as to why you have the called the guys racist throughout this thread.


Rainman05 said:
This is not black people standing up for themselves. If you're comparing the actions of these 2 rappers with that of MLK, then you're really downplaying what MLK tried to achieve. I mean, it's apples and rotten apples. (and just to be specific here, mlk = apple, the 2 rappers = rotten apples).

You have no addressed anything. The only thing you address is accusations that I'm a racist and dodging the topic. It is a pretty sad state of affairs but you know, to each his own. In your mind, I'm sure you're making sense.

This is vigilantiism. It's not on the same scale as say, what the black panthers want to do by putting a bounty on zimmermans' head, but it's the same principle -> hurt someone because of racially motivated reasons. And that, is racism.

Zimmerman is not a vigilante. He is innocent, a court said so and there are no grounds for appeal. So whether you agree with the verdict or not, it doesn't matter, the verdict is there and it is the reality of things. I know you'd rather see him as a man who "got away from justice" but I don't see it that way. He is a man which justice has not let slip, but has protected his rights and civil liberties. He is innocent but still, some racists, wanna beat the snot out of him because, again, racism (one of THEM attacked one of OURS)
Click to expand...
 
I'm not gonna lie...I hope somebody punches his face inside out.
 
SheWolf said:
You didn't answer his questions and went into the same rant. Why are you calling the guys racist? They aren't MLK, but that has nothing to do with providing rational explanation as to why you have the called the guys racist throughout this thread.
Click to expand...

I did and I repeated myself at least half a dozen times.
They're racists and they are vigilantes because they wanna do vigilantiism for racial motives. They have a racial motivation "to fight for all blacks who've been wronged by the system" by taking it out on zimmerman and they'll fight for "trayvon martins' legacy". race, race, race. vigilantiism, vigilantism, vigilatism. How many times must I repeat myself.

They're not interested in charity and the charity side of the event. They're interested in payback and they see this event as an opportunity to go "hunting" for the "oppressor". Even though it's stupid because as I said, zimmerman hadn't freed himself. He got cleared by a tribunal, but racists can't grasp that concept because it's not about the facts, but about the feels.
 
I do not believe their desire to beat him up rises to the occasion of taking the law into their own hands. Payback yes, vigilantism I am not so sure about.

As far as them being racist? In the context of this issue alone I don't see it. They aren't after Zimmerman because of his race. They aren't taking action based upon Trayvon's race, Zimmermans race, or anyone's race. I think they want to beat him up because they think he is a murderer who got away with his crime because they believe the system failed.

Basically I don't see their desire to beat Zimmerman up as an issue of race, more an issue of retribution.
 
Lerxst said:
They aren't taking action based upon Trayvon's race, Zimmermans race, or anyone's race.
Click to expand...

ehh, that's probably highly debatable, since most people seem to have reduced the issue to one of race. And it's not like DMX or the Game are the type of intellectuals who would see the issue as something beyond the confines of the easily accessible narratives we see on tv and the internet
 
Dr. Chuckles said:
ehh, that's probably highly debatable, since most people seem to have reduced the issue to one of race. And it's not like DMX or the Game are the type of intellectuals who would see the issue as something beyond the confines of the easily accessible narratives we see on tv and the internet
Click to expand...

Oh I understand that, I do. I just don't want to go there by assuming to know their unspoken motivations. If I stick to what they are actually verbalizing are their motivations I don't fall into that trap.

Regardless I would still like to see one of them knock Zimmerman out because I think he is a douche nozzle deserving of a good beating.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom