What rulings would those be? Perhaps I've missed it, but I know of no such rulings by the Supreme Court that goes counter to anything President Obama has done to date. Care to elaborate?
Here's a USA Today article going over some of them (
(Source) as well as one from the WSJ
(SOURCE). A sampling summary...
Horne v. Department of Agriculture was a 5th amendment issue with the Obama Administration seizing hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of crop without compensation and claiming the farmers couldn’t even raise the issue with the court without enduring lengthy delays and paying a $483k fine. 9-0 against the administration
Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency claimed a couple couldn’t go to court to seek compensation after the EPA blocked construction of their house. Again, 9-0 against the administration
Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. United States they argued the government isn’t required to compensate people if the government repeatedly and deliberately floods their property. 9-0 against once again.
Hosanna-Tabor Church v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission had the administration claiming that a church’s religious protections under the first amendment doesn’t extend to their decisions regarding the hiring and firing of employees, a position even Elena Kagan decried as “amazing”. Again, 9-0.
United States v. Jones had the administration arguing they could put a GPS onto a suspected drug dealer’s car and electronically monitor his movements without a warrant. Again, 9-0
In no way am I suggesting in any of those cases dthat the administration was sitting there going "mwhahaha, let's go against the constitutional boundries set forth before us". But it is pointing out that simply because Obama chooses to do something doesn't necessarily mean he's doing it "within the law", only within what he and his administration THINK is the law.
And as I pointed out in another thread, the argument is hardly singularly on the notion that Executive Orders are unconstiituional (some think that, but it seems a minority) nor simply the amount (ridiculous to look at a complex issue and argument and boil it down to a singular metric), but rather a combination of multiple factors that lead into the complaints regarding Obama's actions and threatened actions.