1.)All you have here is opinion
2.) and emotion.
3.) You are more than free to exercise both
4.) but emotion has no place in law.
5.) The "wife" has no rights, it is no longer a wife, it is no longer human, it is a thing. Things do not have rights. Less you want to demonstrate that inanimate objects have rights, I await your argument for it. But until then
6.) it will be filed right next to "The earth is 6000 years old".
7.) So with your inability to demonstrate your positive claim that inanimate objects have rights, we are left with just one situation.
8.) The fetus, a living human life9
9.) and the property rights of the husband over the corpse of his wife.
10.) As such, till you can demonstrate your positive claim
11.) rationally we acknowledge that it is life vs property.
12.)The thing is, you just seem like you do not want to admit the side you're on.
13.) There's no opinion on life vs. property, that is fact. Less you can demonstrate otherwise. But you can't, or at least haven't.
14.)Keep running your mouth, but you're not putting forth an argument.
15.) Dead is dead, the dead have no rights.
16.)What's alive is the fetus
17.) and the husband (please don't say something like "you don't think that there are other people alive other than the husband and fetus" because that would just be dishonest tripe and we don't need any more of that from ya)
18.), so the life of the fetus vs. the property rights of the husband.
19.) That's functionally what this comes down to.
20.) You can at least admit that you take property over life instead of trying to do this little song and dance to make it look otherwise.
1,) correct as do you thank you for admitting this again since its what i said from the begining and also why you are wrong trying to falsly and dishonestly claim facts
2.) nope this is another posted lie, theres ZERO emotion on why i want it to go to court, this strawman fails again
3.) i know but im factually only doing one
4.) good thing its a fact i never said it did nor am i using emotion then
5.) earlier examples already prove this false, there are still rights and laws that protect the dead and her husband and family still matter to and there rights, this fact will never change
6.) well that would be a mistake because what i pointed out was factually true and this if factual false
7.) another failed strawman and lie
8.) correct it is
9.) nope there the wifes, husbands and family's rights and laws that protect them all. This wont magically go away.
10.) already done see above and the examples pages ago
11.) who is we? lol you mean YOUR OPINION because thats all it is
12.) another posted lie
13.) proven by WHAT? LMAO this is where your post goes into complete dishonesty mode, this is not a fact, its your opinion, if its a fact state the case that made it so, state the law the makes it so, this hasnt been challenged yet, This case hasnt gone to court yet so WE, me and you, dont know. YOU ARE GUESSING lol and this is why your posts fail. DId marty McFLy tell you how the case will turn out or something? lol sorry when you call it a fact you are 100% factually wrong since this hasnt gone to trail yet, its just your OPINION and nothing will change that fact until theres a trial
nothing
14.) LOL remind me whos emotional again? hehehe thats it get tough. My argument was put further with examples and i called it my opinion and it is and we wont know unlees it gets challenged and goes to trial. So until then you lose and all you have is opinion also. I love that this angers you.
15.) see 5# your point loses again
16.) correct
17.) opinion
18.) opinion
19.) opinion
20.) cant cause thats not what im doing nor is it my argument its your failed strawman and opinion as already proven since theres no trial or case decision yet. Its hilarious watching you get so mad over me simply not sharing your opinion and pointing out that what you are saying is in fact opinion. Why?
Cases has happened therefore its your opinion, just like mine, just like i said pages ago lol
