Why do you call D'Souza "Mr. Morality"?
Being indicted, by the way, is not the same as being guilty.
Like wrongly indicting Tom Delay of Texas, this is just a method that the left uses to strike at the right... the left, as proven in the few instances itemized above, don't really care if someone is cheating... unless he is on the wrong side of the aisle.
Besides, you cannot slip off the hook with the charge of being a hypocrite, you were arguing that Hitchens basically mopped the floor with Dinesh... and you are just flat out wrong... I would say, for instance, in the Hitchens-D'Souza-Prager religious debate D'Souza came out on top. Youtube it and if you are truly a moderate and not of the left, if you are intellectually honest and have any ability to judge such things, you will no doubt agree and, even if you do not, you certainly cannot say Hitchens just walked all over him like you were blithely and lamely asserting previously.
Get there firstest with the mostest. Trust, but verify. When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.
Obama has always had very thin skin. So it should come to no surprise that this took place. More political money probably comes from what this man did than through legal channels. He just didn't have his paperwork in order. I disagree with the bond which had to be posted for a man who turned himself in and has been cooperating with authorities.
Bottom line is that it makes the Justice Department look that much more the Gestapo and Obama that much more petty.