• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

De Blasio ‘getting back at us’ by not plowing: UES residents

another dupe post.
 
Google searches are not citations.

I brought you a link. You cried about it. I gave you the search engine results of the story so you can pick from loads of links and you're still crying. You not wanting to click on them and instead trying to make the topic about me is just you trolling the thread.
 
I gave you the results of the story... loads of links.

Present a link to click on, not a Google search. A few sites that cannot be linked as a citation include TPM, ThinkProgress, Politifact, Slate, DailyKos, DU, HuffPo, etc.
 
Present a link to click on, not a Google search. A few sites that cannot be linked as a citation include TPM, ThinkProgress, Politifact, Slate, DailyKos, DU, HuffPo, etc.

I guess you aren't interested in the story... being that the first three sources at my link are CNN, Jersey Journal and Business Insider Australia. I'm not your monkey. Pick one and stop derailing the thread... for a change.
 
A mayor's word... under oathe with supporting letters

vs

the Lt. Governor making a public announcement of denial not under oathe

Since when is an interview with Anderson Cooper, "under oathe"? The "supporting" letters are letters SHE wrote.

IOW, weshould just take her word for it and not question a damn thing. "She's a Democrat, godammit! She would never lie!"
 
No, you brought a website that cannot be used for citation.

Who the **** are you to determine what can and cannot be used for citation?
 
Who the **** are you to determine what can and cannot be used for citation?

Those sites being jokes have nothing to do with me
 
Since when is an interview with Anderson Cooper, "under oathe"? The "supporting" letters are letters SHE wrote.

IOW, weshould just take her word for it and not question a damn thing. "She's a Democrat, godammit! She would never lie!"

Ok.. she's willing to go under oath. My bad. I will believe her more when she goes under oath. As far as you assuming I believe dems words just for being a dem... meh.
 
Ok.. she's willing to go under oath. My bad. I will believe her more when she goes under oath.

Everyone is willing to go under oath until they have to go under oath.
 
Ok.. she's willing to go under oath. My bad. I will believe her more when she goes under oath. As far as you assuming I believe dems words just for being a dem... meh.

Whatcha wanna bet that it never happens?
 
I've said I've been pleased with Christie's handling of the situation. He fired people that needed to be fired.

That said, MSNBC did not cause the scandal. A Republican did something wrong (assuming that people in Christie's office are Republicans, which is probably a safe assumption), just deal with it instead of trying to deflect blame.


Oh, I am not deflecting anything....I don't really care for Christie too much, other than his brashness in pointing out the absurd reporters when asked dumb questions by media looking for stupid faux outrages to pin on him...What I was doing was pointing out that Obama goes through life with "I didn't know" taped to his forehead, meanwhile he then immediately goes to either investigation to deflect questions, or he simply ignores questions for a couple of weeks, then starts in with "what? that old story?" And libs eat it up and immediately start calling it a faux scandal....

In this thread the feeling among the UES residents is that during the storm, DeBlasio slow dispatched the plows to their area as political payback for an area of the city that clearly didn't support him in the Mayoral race. I am not saying it is true, or not true....I don't know...To know for sure you'd have to be someone in that logistic chain that day. But, I will say that if it were a Republican Mayor in place, and the plows had problems plowing say, Harlem, or Brooklyn there would be a firestorm of screams from liberals including day after day coverage from MSNBC charging political payback....

I don't see one liberal, faux independent, faux other, or faux moderate in here that have defended libs in the past questioning for one post DeBlasio's possible actions...
 
Oh, I am not deflecting anything....I don't really care for Christie too much, other than his brashness in pointing out the absurd reporters when asked dumb questions by media looking for stupid faux outrages to pin on him...What I was doing was pointing out that Obama goes through life with "I didn't know" taped to his forehead, meanwhile he then immediately goes to either investigation to deflect questions, or he simply ignores questions for a couple of weeks, then starts in with "what? that old story?" And libs eat it up and immediately start calling it a faux scandal....

Change the "Obama" to "Christie" and "Libs" to "Cons" and you get exactly what's happening with the bridge story.

In this thread the feeling among the UES residents is that during the storm, DeBlasio slow dispatched the plows to their area as political payback for an area of the city that clearly didn't support him in the Mayoral race. I am not saying it is true, or not true....I don't know...To know for sure you'd have to be someone in that logistic chain that day. But, I will say that if it were a Republican Mayor in place, and the plows had problems plowing say, Harlem, or Brooklyn there would be a firestorm of screams from liberals including day after day coverage from MSNBC charging political payback....

Lets see if there's any evidence of politics being played. Where's the e-mails? Right now it seems kind of like sour grapes about Christie. Good too see you doubling down on the "But, But...teh Meeeeeeeeeeeejia" crap.

I don't see one liberal, faux independent, faux other, or faux moderate in here that have defended libs in the past questioning for one post DeBlasio's possible actions...

Like all the "Undiscloseds" who ran to attack Christie? Hell, you've got a poster carrying water for Christie's blame MSNBC campaign....who's lean says "Independent" and claims to not have an axe to gring. But, they're ALL just libs in hiding.....uh huh...
 
Change the "Obama" to "Christie" and "Libs" to "Cons" and you get exactly what's happening with the bridge story.

Ok, so I ask again....Who'd Obama fire for any of his scandal's?

Lets see if there's any evidence of politics being played. Where's the e-mails? Right now it seems kind of like sour grapes about Christie. Good too see you doubling down on the "But, But...teh Meeeeeeeeeeeejia" crap.

I didn't say it was, or wasn't....In fact I said specifically that there is no way I could know if it was...But that is the feeling of the residents of that area.

Like all the "Undiscloseds" who ran to attack Christie? Hell, you've got a poster carrying water for Christie's blame MSNBC campaign....who's lean says "Independent" and claims to not have an axe to gring. But, they're ALL just libs in hiding.....uh huh...

Not "all", that is just your attempt to over exaggerate what I said to dismiss it. But a goodly number of them sure.
 
Change the "Obama" to "Christie" and "Libs" to "Cons" and you get exactly what's happening with the bridge story.

Not exactly. Unlike Obama, Christie appears to have made no attempt to investigate the matter beyond asking the guilty parties "Are you guilty?"
 
I dont think people should be fired over made up scandals anyway. That one email by the Lt Gov is more evidence of a scandal than all the made up RW scandals combined.
Ok, so I ask again....Who'd Obama fire for any of his scandal's?



I didn't say it was, or wasn't....In fact I said specifically that there is no way I could know if it was...But that is the feeling of the residents of that area.



Not "all", that is just your attempt to over exaggerate what I said to dismiss it. But a goodly number of them sure.
 
I dont think people should be fired over made up scandals anyway. That one email by the Lt Gov is more evidence of a scandal than all the made up RW scandals combined.

Your opinion, but that is all.
 
Back
Top Bottom