• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Gov. Cuomo: Pro-life people not welcome in New York

No, that is not what she said, which is just further evidence that you have no idea what you are talking about.

Why not go to the original interview before stumbling toward these false conclusions you pick up from irresponsible leftist websites? A little research is all it takes.

You tell me, smart guy. What was she really saying?
 
What context is missing that would clarify that quote? She called for "the media" to go on a with hunt for Congresspeople with "Anti-American views." This is irrefutable.

That would also be kind of ignorant of her. Surely she knows that most of the media are themselves Liberals, progressives and socialist? She wants people with "Anti-American views" to go on a witch hunt for people with "Anti-American views"? I guess she was never accused of being the brightest bulb in pack.
 
That would also be kind of ignorant of her. Surely she knows that most of the media are themselves Liberals, progressives and socialist? She wants people with "Anti-American views" to go on a witch hunt for people with "Anti-American views"? I guess she was never accused of being the brightest bulb in pack.

Another leftist not familiar with the interview. Leftists tell each other ridiculous stories and quickly believe them to be true.
 
You tell me, smart guy. What was she really saying?

Are you kidding? It was you who started this foolishness and cannot back it up. Read the interview and then comment, in context, what she said. That's what you advocated elsewhere so why not attempt to be consistent?
 
Are you kidding? It was you who started this foolishness and cannot back it up. Read the interview and then comment, in context, what she said. That's what you advocated elsewhere so why not attempt to be consistent?

I backed it up. I posted what she said. It cannot be interpreted any other way.

MR. MATTHEWS: How many Congress people, members of Congress, do you think are in that anti-American crowd you described? How many Congress people do you serve with? I mean, it's 435 members of Congress.

REP. BACHMANN: Right now --

MR. MATTHEWS: How many are anti-American in the Congress right now that you serve with?

REP. BACHMANN: You'd have to ask them, Chris. I'm focusing on Barack Obama and the people that he's been associating with. And I'm very worried about --

MR. MATTHEWS: But do you suspect that a lot of people you serve with --

REP. BACHMANN: -- their anti-American nature.

MR. MATTHEWS: Well, he's a United States senator from Illinois. He's one of the people you suspect as being anti-American. How many people in the Congress of the United States do you think are anti- American? You've already suspected Barack Obama. Is he alone, or are there others? How many do you suspect of your colleagues as being anti-American?

REP. BACHMANN: What I would say -- what I would say is that the news media should do a penetrating expose and take a look. I wish they would. I wish the American media would take a great look at the views of the people in Congress and find out, are they pro-America or anti-America? I think people would love to see an expose like that.

MR. MATTHEWS: Okay, thank you very much, U.S. Congresswoman Michele Bachmann of Minnesota.

Matthews was pushing her to answer a question she refused to answer, then called for the media to do it for her.
 
I backed it up. I posted what she said. It cannot be interpreted any other way.



Matthews was pushing her to answer a question she refused to answer, then called for the media to do it for her.

And where did you find any evidence of "extremism" in those comments and how could you justify the names you called her as a consequence?
 
And where did you find any evidence of "extremism" in those comments and how could you justify the names you called her as a consequence?

Between that and the other stuff I posted? I think it's plainly obvious that she's out there.
 
Between that and the other stuff I posted? I think it's plainly obvious that she's out there.

It's not "plainly obvious" if you can't point it out directly and in context. The fact is that she did not suggest any "witch hunt" and even the most addle-headed leftist could understand that .
 
It's not "plainly obvious" if you can't point it out directly and in context. The fact is that she did not suggest any "witch hunt" and even the most addle-headed leftist could understand that .

Keep trying to run interference for her actual words, amigo.
 
Gov. Cuomo: Pro-life people not welcome in New York | Fox News


Well, so much for compromise, diversity, and respect for opposing viewpoints...

What he actually said, "extreme conservatives who are right-to-life, pro-assault-weapon, anti-gay? Is that who they are? Because if that’s who they are and they’re the extreme conservatives, they have no place in the state of New York, because that’s not who New Yorkers are." Not quite the same thing as the article headline.

He's right of course. Those activists are not New Yorkers, for the most part. Right to lifers and anti-gays are people fighting against legal acts that involve others. They don't even involve the activists. It is understandable that New York would not want pro-assault weapon extremists amongst them, given the extreme violence in the northeast by violent wackos.
 
Which 'actual words" do you find "extreme"? Can't you respond with a clear answer and stop deflecting?

I've answered the question numerous times. Are you quite done?
 
I've answered the question numerous times. Are you quite done?

No, you have not answered. We have the dialogue you posted but which part of it was "extreme"? Just name it and then we can discuss just how 'extreme' it was.
 
No, you have not answered. We have the dialogue you posted but which part of it was "extreme"? Just name it and then we can discuss just how 'extreme' it was.

I said that her quote about wanting a Congressional witch hunt, along with several other of her policy positions (which I listed), makes her "extreme." I'm not repeating myself again, so I guess we're done.
 
I said that her quote about wanting a Congressional witch hunt, along with several other of her policy positions (which I listed), makes her "extreme." I'm not repeating myself again, so I guess we're done.
But she did not say she wanted a Congressional witch hunt, which is the whole point. You simply cannot quote where she called for one, and these false allegations and name calling by Leftists should stop. Apart from being untrue, these disgusting personal attacks are dividing the country
 
But she did not say she wanted a Congressional witch hunt, which is the whole point. You simply cannot quote where she called for one, and these false allegations and name calling by Leftists should stop. Apart from being untrue, these disgusting personal attacks are dividing the country

Yes she ****ing did! It's her words! READ THEM!

Does what she actually said mean nothing?
 
Yes she ****ing did! It's her words! READ THEM!

Does what she actually said mean nothing?

Please just quote the witch hunt part directly from her, okay?? The two or three lines that really matter. That's all you need do.
 
Already done.

You continue to say that but you cannot quote the couple of lines that count, where she demonstrates your charge of "extremism". You are a typical leftist who uses slander on those who disagree rather than dealing with the genuine issues.
 
You continue to say that but you cannot quote the couple of lines that count, where she demonstrates your charge of "extremism". You are a typical leftist who uses slander on those who disagree rather than dealing with the genuine issues.

Done, multiple times.
 
Done, multiple times.

Yes, that's what you've incorrectly claimed, multiple times.

This trashing of political opponents is so inured within the leftist culture that they (and you) cannot see the facts, nor admit to them. Instead, like you, they exaggerate, lie, and fling taunts and insults like any schoolyard bully, and are seldom asked to defend their juvenile positions. When challenged for the truth they respond exactly like you're doing here.
 
Yes, that's what you've incorrectly claimed, multiple times.

This trashing of political opponents is so inured within the leftist culture that they (and you) cannot see the facts, nor admit to them. Instead, like you, they exaggerate, lie, and fling taunts and insults like any schoolyard bully, and are seldom asked to defend their juvenile positions. When challenged for the truth they respond exactly like you're doing here.

By the way, here's an interesting take on why American leftists, as a result of the country's biased media, are so poorly informed.

Emissions Target :: SteynOnline
 
By the way, here's an interesting take on why American leftists, as a result of the country's biased media, are so poorly informed.

Emissions Target :: SteynOnline

For starters, Mark Steyn can eat all of the dicks.

Secondly, I've posted the quote you want numerous times.

They are her words. They are there. I have posted them, numerous times. I am done attempting to appease you.

Accept them or don't, but they're there. I have nothing else to say.
 
For starters, Mark Steyn can eat all of the dicks.

Secondly, I've posted the quote you want numerous times.

They are her words. They are there. I have posted them, numerous times. I am done attempting to appease you.

Accept them or don't, but they're there. I have nothing else to say.

Classic! You don't even see how you just got owned do you? :lamo
 
Back
Top Bottom