• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Gov. Cuomo: Pro-life people not welcome in New York

Issues don't matter anymore. Little wonder the country is $18 trillion in debt, almost half the country is getting help from the government, and the public education system continues to decline..

I see it different. IMO, people who believe in the invisible sky daddy are not qualified to be president, and someone who is openly gay is probably more honest than all those candidates who pretend to love their wives.
 
I just have to ask...

What does his sexuality or religious or lack of them have to do with someones politics or being a good politician? So you are saying if Kim Jong Un, was gay (He is married, but who knows?) and he already is an atheist, you would just move to North Korea, and be happy.
See my response in 226.
 
More than just those. Socialism, in it's various forms, is nothing but slavery promoted by people too retarded and stupid to realize that it is slavery and has utterly failed for 200+ years now.

Capitalism has it's own problems. For instance you get a highly profitable football league skimping on referee costs by hiring part timers to do the job, pay cheerleaders nothing but a stipend and paying players, the backbone of the league, who destroy their minds and bodies, the least amount of money as is humanly possible.
 
I see it different. IMO, people who believe in the invisible sky daddy are not qualified to be president, and someone who is openly gay is probably more honest than all those candidates who pretend to love their wives.

Gays are more honest and straights only pretend to love their wives. And wives only pretend to love their husbands?

It's an amazing world you live in and, sadly, one inhabited by many leftists. Cliches have replaced thought and common sense. It seems leftists can never be embarrassed, no matter how ludicrous their words and beliefs.
 
Gays are more honest and straights only pretend to love their wives. And wives only pretend to love their husbands?

It's an amazing world you live in and, sadly, one inhabited by many leftists. Cliches have replaced thought and common sense. It seems leftists can never be embarrassed, no matter how ludicrous their words and beliefs.
Politicians, especially Republicans, tend to be closeted while pretending to be happily married.
Top 10 Anti-Gay Politicians Caught Being Gay: Anti-Gay Activists Out of The Closet
 
Capitalism has it's own problems. For instance you get a highly profitable football league skimping on referee costs by hiring part timers to do the job, pay cheerleaders nothing but a stipend and paying players, the backbone of the league, who destroy their minds and bodies, the least amount of money as is humanly possible.

if it wasn't for capitalism you wouldn't have a computer which means no internet which means you wouldn't be on this site bad mouthing capitalism. life's funny isn't it?
 
if it wasn't for capitalism you wouldn't have a computer which means no internet which means you wouldn't be on this site bad mouthing capitalism. life's funny isn't it?

Capitalism is great as long as you aren't one of the thousands of poor schmucks making this iPhone in China's Foxconn factory. My life, for example, is awesome. But, I'm smart enough to know "I didn't build that."

We are society's winners. Some of us are man and woman enough to admit that most of that victory is due to winning the ovary lottery.
 
Last edited:
I see it different. IMO, people who believe in the invisible sky daddy are not qualified to be president, and someone who is openly gay is probably more honest than all those candidates who pretend to love their wives.

So you see others as "categories" rather than as individuals. That must make voting very easy for you. No need to study the platforms or particular planks so long as they fit a couple of criteria--atheist and/or gay. Would a gay atheist conservative be okay, then?
 
So you see others as "categories" rather than as individuals. That must make voting very easy for you. No need to study the platforms or particular planks so long as they fit a couple of criteria--atheist and/or gay. Would a gay atheist conservative be okay, then?

Well, since there are countless god and country male republicans who rode the anti-gay horse only to be busted soliciting sex from male prostitutes, I suspect my screening process is more reliable than yours.
 
Well, since there are countless god and country male republicans who rode the anti-gay horse only to be busted soliciting sex from male prostitutes, I suspect my screening process is more reliable than yours.

Yeah people like Weiner are sloop much better.
 
Why is everyone so surprised when the myth of liberal tolerance is exposed like this?

Because the "myth of liberal tolerance" has been twisted to mean that liberals are being intolerant if they are intolerant of intolerance.

Now, Re: Cuomo's comments. Taken in context, his meaning is quite clear -- that far-right politicians have a pretty tough row to hoe if they're going to get elected in New York State. I live in New York. Our Republicans, for the most part, are pretty moderate. It was an extremely inelegantly phrased statement, but it sure wasn't the clarion call for a purge of conservatives that some are making it out to be.
 
Because the "myth of liberal tolerance" has been twisted to mean that liberals are being intolerant if they are intolerant of intolerance.

Now, Re: Cuomo's comments. Taken in context, his meaning is quite clear -- that far-right politicians have a pretty tough row to hoe if they're going to get elected in New York State. I live in New York. Our Republicans, for the most part, are pretty moderate. It was an extremely inelegantly phrased statement, but it sure wasn't the clarion call for a purge of conservatives that some are making it out to be.

Wasn't Cuomo's comments directed at the already centrist Republicans? That they have to move even further left? That might be one legitimate interpretation. Interesting positioning, in that the GOP has not had much success as running as 'Democrat lite', which leads me to believe that this is little more than calling for the remaining centrist Republicans to continue their record of defeats to the continued gain of the liberal / progressive / Democrats.

I really don't care much how deep the progressive / liberal / Democrats screw New York state into the ground, into further fiscal insolvency and greater and greater tax burdens for the productive parts of the economy and people that remains.

For more than 15 years, New York state has led the country in domestic outmigration: For every American who comes here, roughly two depart for other states. This outmigration slowed briefly following the onset of the Great Recession. But a recent Marist poll suggests that the rate is likely to increase: 36 percent of New Yorkers under 30 plan to leave over the next five years. Why are all these people fleeing?

For one thing, according to a recent survey in Chief Executive, our state has the second-worst business climate in the country. (Only California ranks lower.) People go where the jobs are, so when a state repels businesses, it repels residents, too.
Why New York’s future is fleeing | New York Post
New York State accounted for the biggest migration exodus of any state in the nation between 2000 and 2010, with 3.4 million residents leaving over that period, according to the Tax Foundation.

Over that decade the state gained 2.1 million, so net migration amounted to 1.3 million, representing a loss of $45.6 billion in income.

Where are they escaping to? The Tax Foundation found that more than 600,000 New York residents moved to Florida over the decade – opting perhaps for the Sunshine State’s more lenient tax system – taking nearly $20 billion in adjusted growth income with them.
Escape From New York? High-Taxing Empire State Loses 3.4 Million Residents in 10 Years | CNS News

New York - Migration

This continued bleeding of people and businesses to tax is sure to put the bite on all the foolish liberal tax and spend policies, and I'm sure, will self-correct eventually. In the mean time, by all means, please continue. Other states are more than welcoming of your ex-resident, and ex-producers.

It's pretty clear that the left end of the spectrum has moved significantly left in recent years, like the last 10 or so, making what used to be center right end of the spectrum look extreme right in comparison. Is it by this measure that the left determine who is a moderate Republican? Seems likely so. Would make me think that this is the biggest moving of the goal posts to date yet.
 
Apologies, but I need to snip for brevity and to address certain points without getting bogged down. I will attempt to retain as much context as possible.

Wasn't Cuomo's comments directed at the already centrist Republicans? That they have to move even further left?

No. His comments were directed at "extremist Republicans." Since that's what he said.

I really don't care much how deep the progressive / liberal / Democrats screw New York state into the ground, into further fiscal insolvency and greater and greater tax burdens for the productive parts of the economy and people that remains.

I don't know if you're aware of this, but under Gov. Cuomo, state taxes have been cut pretty significantly over the last three years. And there's been a whole mess of tax breaks for businesses under his administration (one of your articles was from 2011). NYS definitely had a problem with too high of taxation -- it's being brought into line with other economically similar states.

It's pretty clear that the left end of the spectrum has moved significantly left in recent years, like the last 10 or so, making what used to be center right end of the spectrum look extreme right in comparison. Is it by this measure that the left determine who is a moderate Republican? Seems likely so. Would make me think that this is the biggest moving of the goal posts to date yet.

I think the left end of the spectrum has moved slightly over the last few years as a knee-jerk reaction to the disastrous policies of the Bush administration and the GOP when they ran the show exclusively for the first six years of this century. I don't think it's moved very far.
 
Capitalism has it's own problems. For instance you get a highly profitable football league skimping on referee costs by hiring part timers to do the job, pay cheerleaders nothing but a stipend and paying players, the backbone of the league, who destroy their minds and bodies, the least amount of money as is humanly possible.

Bad example. Capitalism is competitive. You're example is not capitalist, it is a monopoly which is corporatist and mainly distinguishable from socialism in that in socialism, society is the slave master instead of a corporation. There is only 1 NFL, no other league competes with it.
 
Apologies, but I need to snip for brevity and to address certain points without getting bogged down. I will attempt to retain as much context as possible.



No. His comments were directed at "extremist Republicans." Since that's what he said.



I don't know if you're aware of this, but under Gov. Cuomo, state taxes have been cut pretty significantly over the last three years. And there's been a whole mess of tax breaks for businesses under his administration (one of your articles was from 2011). NYS definitely had a problem with too high of taxation -- it's being brought into line with other economically similar states.



I think the left end of the spectrum has moved slightly over the last few years as a knee-jerk reaction to the disastrous policies of the Bush administration and the GOP when they ran the show exclusively for the first six years of this century. I don't think it's moved very far.

The perception of how far which parts of the political spectrum have moved is a subjective one, so there's really no right or wrong on that one. Safe to say that it's probably somewhere between the smaller move to the left that you believe and the greater move to the left that I believe.

So yesterday's centrists have now become the present right, just a matter of how much.

Cuomo specifically called out to: right-to-life, pro-assault-weapon, anti-gay

Why is wanting to preserve human life an extreme position?
Personally, I favor the right to chose, for myself and others, but never plan to use that right to terminate a life, as is still my right. But far be it for me to deny other the right to chose.

Why is pro-assault-weapon an extreme position?
I don't see it as one. I see it as a right to bear arms and 2nd amendment position. Do you realize that it is completely legal and legitimate right for any private citizen to own nearly any weapon system the US military has? It's true. No, I"m not saying that everyone should have a 105mm howitzer set up in their front yard, but the maintaining of the right is significant. Besides, the last statistics that I saw, assault rifles were the least weapon involved of all weapons used in murders. Why take that right away from citizens?

Anti-gay. You know what? I really don't care what adults do behind closed doors, and I don't think that it's the government's right to be involved or concerned about it either. Just don't shove it my face, is all I ask. Not in the streets. Not on the TV. Not in the movie theaters, unless I seek it out. Changing the context of a term that's been used for centuries to mean one thing, and twist is into a definition to mean something else just doesn't seem right to me. In the eyes of the law exactly equal not one iota difference, fine. Seems that we are overly pro-gay and anti-hetero rather than a reasonable balance between.

So who exactly was Cuomo addressing? Yeah, there are some nut jobs way over the line on somethings, and he's not tolerant enough to allow them to stay? Really?
 
So who exactly was Cuomo addressing? Yeah, there are some nut jobs way over the line on somethings, and he's not tolerant enough to allow them to stay? Really?

He never said they "couldn't stay." He was quite clearly saying that those types (the extreme pro-life/anti-gay/etc.) simply aren't going to get elected in New York. And he was right.
 
He never said they "couldn't stay." He was quite clearly saying that those types (the extreme pro-life/anti-gay/etc.) simply aren't going to get elected in New York. And he was right.

And since when is he the "decider" of who is and who isn't welcome?
 
Yeah people like Weiner are sloop much better.

See. There's another politician pretending to love his wife. It's sickening BS.
 
And since when is he the "decider" of who is and who isn't welcome?

Oy vey.

As I said, I thought his statement was inelegant at best. But what he meant, in full context, is obvious. You try getting elected in any but the absolute reddest parts of NY State as a Louie Gohmert/Steve King type and see how fast your ass gets sent packing. He wasn't delivering a mandate, he was simply stating simple fact when it comes to the New York State electorate. The Tea Party (rather, the politicians that run under the banner of the TP but are generally right-wing whackadoodles) has been roundly rejected in New York.
 
Bad example. Capitalism is competitive. You're example is not capitalist, it is a monopoly which is corporatist and mainly distinguishable from socialism in that in socialism, society is the slave master instead of a corporation. There is only 1 NFL, no other league competes with it.

A couple have tried, and they all failed.
 
Oy vey.

As I said, I thought his statement was inelegant at best. But what he meant, in full context, is obvious. You try getting elected in any but the absolute reddest parts of NY State as a Louie Gohmert/Steve King type and see how fast your ass gets sent packing. He wasn't delivering a mandate, he was simply stating simple fact when it comes to the New York State electorate. The Tea Party (rather, the politicians that run under the banner of the TP but are generally right-wing whackadoodles) has been roundly rejected in New York.

yeah, that all makes sense. however, if the Mississippi governor said that he didn't want people who were pro-gay marriage in his state I have a strange feeling you wouldn't let it slide off your back like Cuomo's comments.
 
yeah, that all makes sense. however, if the Mississippi governor said that he didn't want people who were pro-gay marriage in his state I have a strange feeling you wouldn't let it slide off your back like Cuomo's comments.

I dunno, I guess we'll see if it happens.
 
He never said they "couldn't stay." He was quite clearly saying that those types (the extreme pro-life/anti-gay/etc.) simply aren't going to get elected in New York. And he was right.

I think it's more of STFU or to the back of the bus with you. Typically arrogant liberal as one would have come to expect.
 
I think it's more of STFU or to the back of the bus with you.

If you insist.

Typically arrogant liberal as one would have come to expect.

Let's see how many other negative things we can claim liberals have cornered the market on. Because libertarians are certainly never arrogant. :roll:
 
Back
Top Bottom