The facts are simple. A human child's life hangs in the balance right now because his life support source happened to die. A living woman couldn't have an abortion in Texas at 20 weeks, so why should a dead one be able to?
And no, you still didn't answer my question, and I suspect it's because you realized "Of course we shouldn't remove the body, exploding the bomb and killing other people." It's like one of two conjoined twins dying. You'd rather whine and cry about the rights of the dead twin instead of recognizing the other twin has been dependent on those same organs for his entire life as well.
I mean ****, look at yourself, you're arguing that we should kill another human being. Maybe one day you'll recognize the world isn't crystal clear black and white, but rather a magnificent shade of grey.