I say "kid" because it's age-neutral, it's not a technical term, so it doesn't mean anything specific. When I say child, even though there is a generic denotation of child that applies, you people fuss. When I'm already accommodating to prevent your whining and fussing, you don't get to whine or fuss about semantics anymore. Sorry. That's how it works.
I didn't distort anything.
Well under perfectly valid Texas law, abortion is illegal. Under the unconstitutional tyrannical nonsense standard of Roe v. Wade, those laws "violated the Constitution" so Texas has to allow abortions under certain circumstances. This ain't one of them. The dead lady didn't kill her kid. If she had, then that ventilator would be off right now.It is still a fetus and by law can be terminated under many conditions and not be a murder.
Nope. The doctors can't stop providing life support for the kid's sake and the next of kin's agreement doesn't mean **** other than to establish that the next of kin doesn't have the kid's best interests at heart. The kid has a right to life.A gunman can't shoot a pregnant lady but the doctors can stop keeping a dead woman's body functioning if the next of kin agrees and the fetus is under the legal limit.
Bull****. Starvation and suffocation isn't any kind of abortion method.If nothing else it is abortion on demand
There was no DNR.and while Texas is doing it's utmost to strangle that law the doctor who pulls the plug on the dead mother has privileges at the hospital and the woman has a DNR.