- Joined
- Sep 18, 2011
- Messages
- 17,471
- Reaction score
- 4,063
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
The lawyer who made that for her should have advised her that it wouldn't apply while pregnant. IMO her estate is entitled to a refund.
There was no such directive. If she had tried to made such a directive, one that would have applied while pregnant, that clause would not have been legally valid anyway and would have been ignored.
Since when do husbands have a right to choose anyway?
Good point. Husbands have no say and that's the way they like it. Now they turn around and try to pull this crap. It's amusing because it's so pathetic and transparent.