- Joined
- May 1, 2013
- Messages
- 119,655
- Reaction score
- 75,591
- Location
- Outside Seattle
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Hopefully such an intrusion of rights will be repealed and reversed. Turning voters that have issues with changing the definition of marriage into second class citizens in lieu of social changes and progressives/liberals wanting to declare perversion as a protected right worthy enough to completely redefine the English language is not something that should happen. When in doubt, when politics don't go your way just file with the courts and hope some activist judges will give your opinion on a political/social issue legal protection :shrug: everyone does it.
.
Ohhhh, the victim card!
The definition of marriage includes alot more than gender distinctions for Americans. All Americans. Two bodies with interchangeable parts are not ALL that a marriage is based on.
Some 'definitions' have been declared unConstitutional, like the ones where it was illegal for birracial couples to marry too. Were the citizens of VA that objected to Loving vs VA also '2nd class citizens?'
The change is based on equal rights and equal protection under the law. If you can tell me how SSM harms non-SSM marriage in anyway, I'd like to hear it.