• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Woman sues divorce attorneys for ending her marriage

danarhea

danarhea

Slayer of the DP Newsbot
DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 27, 2005
Messages
43,602
Reaction score
26,256
Location
Houston, TX
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
A British woman tried to sue her divorce attorneys, claiming they failed to properly explain to her that getting a divorce would end her marriage.

Jane Mulcahy argued her lawyers did not make it clear to her that divorcing her now ex-husband would cause the marriage to be terminated, the Independent reported.
Click to expand...

'Ya know, that is not something she should have learned from her lawyers. That is something she should have learned when she was taking English grammar in the third grade. LMAO.

Article is here.
 
danarhea said:
'Ya know, that is not something she should have learned from her lawyers. That is something she should have learned when she was taking English grammar in the third grade. LMAO.

Article is here.
Click to expand...

Someone please help me understand what this woman could think a divorce was? This makes no sense what an idiot :(
 
danarhea said:
'Ya know, that is not something she should have learned from her lawyers. That is something she should have learned when she was taking English grammar in the third grade. LMAO.

Article is here.
Click to expand...

I wonder what she thought "divorce" was in the first place?
 
To be fair, apparently there is a middleground in British law that gives a bow to the RC Church called judicial separation. It separates the two but doesn't count as divorce to the Church. That is what she was seeking.
 
clownboy said:
To be fair, apparently there is a middleground in British law that gives a bow to the RC Church called judicial separation. It separates the two but doesn't count as divorce to the Church. That is what she was seeking.
Click to expand...

Killjoy.
 
Chocolate said:
Someone please help me understand what this woman could think a divorce was? This makes no sense what an idiot :(
Click to expand...

The only thing that I could think of is the idea she may have thought a divorce was some sort of financial arbitration or a prenup after the fact.
 
clownboy said:
To be fair, apparently there is a middleground in British law that gives a bow to the RC Church called judicial separation. It separates the two but doesn't count as divorce to the Church. That is what she was seeking.
Click to expand...

You're what americans call a "Party Pooper" I need one of those Men in black lasor things after seeing your post
 
sounds like the guy that sued nike because they didn't have a warning that their shoes could be used as deadly weapons.
 
Chocolate said:
You're what americans call a "Party Pooper" I need one of those Men in black lasor things after seeing your post
Click to expand...

Should have put humor in the title and posted it in off topic then. Some of us read the links before commenting. :mrgreen:
 
clownboy said:
Should have put humor in the title and posted it in off topic then. Some of us read the links before commenting. :mrgreen:
Click to expand...

gotta get the likes with the funnys >:I
 
I guess I'm going to have to be the one to risk looking stupid and ask, is there any problem with her and her now ex husband just getting married again?
 
Cardinal said:
I guess I'm going to have to be the one to risk looking stupid and ask, is there any problem with her and her now ex husband just getting married again?
Click to expand...

Yep, her ex husband. :mrgreen:
 
Cardinal said:
I guess I'm going to have to be the one to risk looking stupid and ask, is there any problem with her and her now ex husband just getting married again?
Click to expand...

Good question. In the US obviously not, but I don't know a damn thing about English Law (or even much about divorce law in the US).

I'd assume they could get remarried again. I know it happens all the time in the US....
 
danarhea said:
'Ya know, that is not something she should have learned from her lawyers. That is something she should have learned when she was taking English grammar in the third grade. LMAO.
Click to expand...
Article is here.
Click to expand...




Just when you begin to think that you've heard it all something like this comes along.

How can anyone be so frickin' stupid and still remember to breathe?

The lawyers in this case will likely have a little longer talk with future clients.
 
Last edited:
danarhea said:
'Ya know, that is not something she should have learned from her lawyers. That is something she should have learned when she was taking English grammar in the third grade. LMAO.

Article is here.
Click to expand...

The larger idiot is her new lawyer.
 
Seriously? Has it come to the point that every single common English word has to be explained in words of one syllable?
At first I thought this was a joke until reading it from several blogs, I guess the lady have to learn few more words to
avoid such problems in the near future.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom