- Joined
- May 19, 2012
- Messages
- 2,671
- Reaction score
- 535
- Location
- OC California
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Other
Re: Police not guilty in Kelly Thomas death; DA won't try 3rd officer
You have a slam-dunk for the prosecution because they had audio-visual of the entire thing, you have cops and DA trying to cover it up initially (perhaps you've forgotten the Mexican standoff with DA Racockass and the surveillance video that went on for days, while he allowed the cops to review it and get their story straight - they could have even deleted segments of it), and the same DA prosecuting his buddies that he tried to help, which is a clear conflict of interest. The video speaks for itself. Sure, Thomas was being a smartass, but , last I checked, being a smartass is still legal.
You attempt to justify the murder by suggesting that normal police conduct calls for smartasses to be beaten to a pulp until they are unrecognizeable and dead. You keep parroting the ridiculous notion that these 6 cops couldn't take down this 135 lb. unarmed (and pleading for his life) homeless guy, and cuff him without beating him to death. 135 lbs.??? The video doesn't and never will corroborate these pathetic claims that 6 trained healthy cops' lives were in danger at any time. That's why if the jury was not bribed, then they were misled by less than honest jury instructions.
So you are just spouting off nonsense withouyt any factual information to back up what you say. Figures.
Like I previously said. The only flagrant display here, are the assertions coming from your biased imagination.
You have a slam-dunk for the prosecution because they had audio-visual of the entire thing, you have cops and DA trying to cover it up initially (perhaps you've forgotten the Mexican standoff with DA Racockass and the surveillance video that went on for days, while he allowed the cops to review it and get their story straight - they could have even deleted segments of it), and the same DA prosecuting his buddies that he tried to help, which is a clear conflict of interest. The video speaks for itself. Sure, Thomas was being a smartass, but , last I checked, being a smartass is still legal.
You attempt to justify the murder by suggesting that normal police conduct calls for smartasses to be beaten to a pulp until they are unrecognizeable and dead. You keep parroting the ridiculous notion that these 6 cops couldn't take down this 135 lb. unarmed (and pleading for his life) homeless guy, and cuff him without beating him to death. 135 lbs.??? The video doesn't and never will corroborate these pathetic claims that 6 trained healthy cops' lives were in danger at any time. That's why if the jury was not bribed, then they were misled by less than honest jury instructions.