I see you haven't been paying attention huh?
Much like to the information you used to make the false assertion about falsifying reports. :doh
Let me clue you into something.
While it is in the video, I do not have to show any such force being used in it, as the following information is know to us.
The Officers reported and testified that he was, and that they were surprised by it.
That it was so great that they thought he may have been on drugs.
He resisted with such force that multiple taserings did not effect him and that he resisted with such force that multiple calls for back up were made.
He resisted with such force that it took six Officers to subdue him.
Do you truly not understand these things?
In the following, while one Officer is trying to get Kelly's arm completely into the crook of his back, which Kelly can be seen to be resisting, Kelly can also be seen to push up and then forward, moving both Officers.
Not one, but two. Do you also not understand that?
:doh
:lamo
You really have no clue. Nor is that the way it works.
The only flagrant display here, is the assertions coming from your biased imagination.
Corrupt Judge? Where do you come up with such nonsense?
The expert is the training Officer. Not the person who fired them.
It is really ridiculous to say he lied.
All you are showing is that the reasoning of the two is at odds.
And as the training Officer is the expert, he has more credibility then the other who had termination authority.
Which, in conjunction with the Jury's verdict, will most likely be the reason they get their jobs back.
:doh
Bs.
And you are even trying to switch it up.
There is nothing credible that you can provide to back up what you originally said.
The anonymous source does not say that the reports were falsified.
And frankly, it appears to be you who has trouble accepting.
The Jury found them not guilty. Accept it and move on.
