if YOU would like to start a different topic feel free to do so or if you think the many links in the OP or what i proved wrong is not true simply bring any facts to the table to prove otherwise. Id love to read them.lol
but no i have no interest in some off topic debate about your opinions and philosophies that have nothing to do with the OP, is there a reason why i should care about what you want? especially when it has nothing to do with the op/topic?
2.) nope i posted what is factually taking place according to the law, FED and State
the marriages FACTUALLY arent null currently
the marriages FACTUALLY arent meaningless and do have legality currently
these facts have been proven by law, FED and State
if you disagree simply provide any facts you have that prove otherwise
B) Yes, but that decision was at the federal level...so because it was based on "equal protection and equal treatment under the law" which are Constitutional...how can denial of SSM be legal in ANY state? (Tyranny of the majority over the minority....)
Does this mean the same sex couples inUtah can file as married couples now?
Didn't he need to change rules and laws before he made this statement?
I thought the feds were not at the point where they were recognizing same sex marriages yet.