• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Emails link top Christie aide to GWB lane-closing controversy - [W:77,109:573]

Re: Emails link top Christie aide to GWB lane-closing controversy - [W:77,109]

Nail meet head....Exactly right American, but they won't stop there, Progressives are never satisfied with leaving their opponent standing....They want him either dead, or out of office at the least.

These personal attacks will continue against anyone who the leftists feel might be a threat to Hillary Clinton, or any Democratic candidate. The real issues are no longer important.
 
Re: Emails link top Christie aide to GWB lane-closing controversy - [W:77,109]

As exists in many high power, high profile positions, sometimes you have people around you, trying to make a name for themselves, in doing things they think you'll appreciate, even if you knew nothing about it...IMHO, you libs have a better argument with the "culture" surrounding Christie then you do trying to "frog march" him for a press moment...But it really goes to show you how vindictive liberals are when people don't agree with them lock step.



Yes, he led...Wish we could say the same for Obama.



No, I am saying that the disgruntled employee is not someone I would call objective, and honest after they got fired. Talk about 'having it both ways', these two were fired for possible criminal acts, and you want Christie so bad that you immediately believe anything they imply without evidence....



Yes, he did, but I am sure that the only narrative that will be accepted by you is that CC is guilty. If not by actual evidence, then by smear, and innuendo.



No, this was a traffic jam...Or, if you will, a Tuesday on the GW. The only reason you display his resume is because you want to somehow infer that by being a republican, he must be guilty....That's bs, but I understand, you have nothing else.



No, it's a soap opera....You want to know what a scandal is....Read up on any of these...

Fast and Furious
IRS
NSA
Benghazi
Unilateral appointment while congress was not in recess
Sidestepping congress on Dream act
Crony capitalism from the Oval office

Take your pick, anyone of those are REAL scandals that are being stonewalled by your President currently, in varying degrees. And the difference is that this corruption is brought to us by progressive liberal demo's in the highest office in the land, not some Governor of a state, that had people causing traffic jams....Give me a break...:roll:

Thank you for your nice list of soap operas. Its a nice trip down memory lane. Its good you can remember them, as no one else will.
 
Re: Emails link top Christie aide to GWB lane-closing controversy - [W:77,109]

Few things amuse leftists more than fat jokes, or laughing at the physically handicapped.
Yeah the rightnuts never made a fat joke ...just ask Michael Moore.:lamo
images (41).jpg
 
Last edited:
Re: Emails link top Christie aide to GWB lane-closing controversy - [W:77,109]

images (42).jpg
:lamo:lamo:lamo
 
Re: Emails link top Christie aide to GWB lane-closing controversy - [W:77,109]

Yeah the rightnuts never made a fat joke ...just ask Michael Moore.:lamo
View attachment 67161404

Oh looky, he pulls something off the Internet and thinks he's got proof positive. :roll:
 
Re: Emails link top Christie aide to GWB lane-closing controversy - [W:77,109]

Nail meet head....Exactly right American, but they won't stop there, Progressives are never satisfied with leaving their opponent standing....They want him either dead, or out of office at the least.

Most libs probably had massive orgasms when they read this.

stock-vector-mission-accomplished-reward-stamp-111650279.jpg
 
Re: Emails link top Christie aide to GWB lane-closing controversy - [W:77,109]

You never mentioned who made the Michael Moore poster but disparaging the handicapped goes right to the top with the Democrats. ]
Are you saying that Christie is handicapped because he is retarded?
 
Re: Emails link top Christie aide to GWB lane-closing controversy - [W:77,109]

These personal attacks will continue against anyone who the leftists feel might be a threat to Hillary Clinton, or any Democratic candidate. The real issues are no longer important.

Barack Obama defeated Hillary Clinton despite the MSM initially being in the tank for her. Why are Republicans so weak that they presume that any attack on a Republican is a pro-active defense of Hillary?
 
Re: Emails link top Christie aide to GWB lane-closing controversy - [W:77,109]

Barack Obama defeated Hillary Clinton despite the MSM initially being in the tank for her. Why are Republicans so weak that they presume that any attack on a Republican is a pro-active defense of Hillary?

They are weak because they lack popular support for their ideas..no scratch that.
They are weak because they have no coherent ideas or an individual who can convince voters otherwise.
 
Re: Emails link top Christie aide to GWB lane-closing controversy - [W:77,109]

Are you saying that Christie is handicapped because he is retarded?

You can read the post, can't you?

Why do leftists always need everything explained to them more than once? You should be suing whatever school you may have attended for not doing a proper job..
 
Re: Emails link top Christie aide to GWB lane-closing controversy - [W:77,109]

Barack Obama defeated Hillary Clinton despite the MSM initially being in the tank for her. Why are Republicans so weak that they presume that any attack on a Republican is a pro-active defense of Hillary?

Because their history demonstrates this. And yes, the MSM was in the tank for Hillary before they were in the tank for Obama. The fact that the MSM is 'in the tank' for any politician doesn't seem to disturb you at all. This is probably why leftists are called 'low information voters'.
 
Re: Emails link top Christie aide to GWB lane-closing controversy - [W:77,109]

They are weak because they lack popular support for their ideas..no scratch that.
They are weak because they have no coherent ideas or an individual who can convince voters otherwise.

What "ideas" are you referring to?
 
Re: Emails link top Christie aide to GWB lane-closing controversy - [W:77,109]

Good article about the long road ahead for Christie, by Jeffrey Toobin.

Conclusion:

"Ultimately, Fishman will probably give immunity to Kelly and Stepien, meaning that they will testify before a grand jury. At that point, they will be called before the legislative committee, because they won’t be able to take the Fifth anymore. By then, it will probably be summer at the earliest.

If there are indictments, they probably will not be issued until fall—and trials, if any, would be held in 2015.

In short (or rather, long), Chris Christie can look forward to many months of investigations. News leaks will abound.

Like most U.S. Attorney operations, Fishman’s investigation has been largely invisible to the public, but the legislators, especially the Democrats, live to embarrass the governor. And this is really the best-case scenario for Christie, one in which the investigators do not find anything that would seriously implicate him.

Events are now firmly out of his control. All Christie wants to do is put this whole matter behind him. It will be increasingly apparent that he has a long road ahead of him."

Bridgegate Will Be a Long Road for Chris Christie : The New Yorker

It also helps to explain about a little known term "act-of-production immunity" - which we will likely be hearing more about as the months drag on.
 
Re: Emails link top Christie aide to GWB lane-closing controversy - [W:77,109]

Why are you Conservatives angry at Liberals? Liberals didn't close the bridge lanes. Liberals didn't play politics with the Sandy funds. Liberals didn't say stupid things to mayors of NJ. That all happened with CC's people. Why are you not attacking them?
 
Re: Emails link top Christie aide to GWB lane-closing controversy - [W:77,109]

Why are you Conservatives angry at Liberals? Liberals didn't close the bridge lanes. Liberals didn't play politics with the Sandy funds. Liberals didn't say stupid things to mayors of NJ. That all happened with CC's people. Why are you not attacking them?

Maybe this will help...I am going to use your sentiment here:

Why are Liberals so mad at Conservatives? Conservatives didn't use the IRS to target political enemies, Conservatives didn't leave our ambassador, and other brave americans to fend for themselves while under attack, then cover it up, Conservatives didn't say stupid things about a video to further that cover up, this all happened with BHO's people. Why are you not attacking them?

See how that works?
 
Re: Emails link top Christie aide to GWB lane-closing controversy - [W:77,109]

Good article about the long road ahead for Christie, by Jeffrey Toobin.

Conclusion:

"Ultimately, Fishman will probably give immunity to Kelly and Stepien, meaning that they will testify before a grand jury. At that point, they will be called before the legislative committee, because they won’t be able to take the Fifth anymore. By then, it will probably be summer at the earliest.

If there are indictments, they probably will not be issued until fall—and trials, if any, would be held in 2015.

In short (or rather, long), Chris Christie can look forward to many months of investigations. News leaks will abound.

Like most U.S. Attorney operations, Fishman’s investigation has been largely invisible to the public, but the legislators, especially the Democrats, live to embarrass the governor. And this is really the best-case scenario for Christie, one in which the investigators do not find anything that would seriously implicate him.

Events are now firmly out of his control. All Christie wants to do is put this whole matter behind him. It will be increasingly apparent that he has a long road ahead of him."

Bridgegate Will Be a Long Road for Chris Christie : The New Yorker

It also helps to explain about a little known term "act-of-production immunity" - which we will likely be hearing more about as the months drag on.

More echo chamber blather...Do you ever read, or listen to anything that opposes your own views?
 
Re: Emails link top Christie aide to GWB lane-closing controversy - [W:77,109]

All the time.

It's conservatives who live in an echo chamber.
 
Re: Emails link top Christie aide to GWB lane-closing controversy - [W:77,109]

Maybe this will help...I am going to use your sentiment here:

Why are Liberals so mad at Conservatives? Conservatives didn't use the IRS to target political enemies, Conservatives didn't leave our ambassador, and other brave americans to fend for themselves while under attack, then cover it up, Conservatives didn't say stupid things about a video to further that cover up, this all happened with BHO's people. Why are you not attacking them?

See how that works?

What are you talking about? First, you didn't answer my questions and second you didn't even address the topic.

Looks to me that you're running from the issue in an effort to divert attention away from CC's screwed up administration.

Are you afraid to face the situation with CC?
 
Re: Emails link top Christie aide to GWB lane-closing controversy - [W:77,109]

What "ideas" are you referring to?

I said they had no coherent ideas and no future. The supply side mantra has failed and voters know it. The "job creators" turned out to be a huge bust.
 
Re: Emails link top Christie aide to GWB lane-closing controversy - [W:77,109]

Maybe this will help...I am going to use your sentiment here:

Why are Liberals so mad at Conservatives? Conservatives didn't use the IRS to target political enemies, Conservatives didn't leave our ambassador, and other brave americans to fend for themselves while under attack, then cover it up, Conservatives didn't say stupid things about a video to further that cover up, this all happened with BHO's people. Why are you not attacking them?

See how that works?
I see how it works.
Divide everyone into two camps, and you can easily find something foolish that someone is each camp has done or said.
 
Re: Emails link top Christie aide to GWB lane-closing controversy - [W:77,109]

I said they had no coherent ideas and no future. The supply side mantra has failed and voters know it. The "job creators" turned out to be a huge bust.
When you don't know what those "ideas" were, just say so.

That was not an election about 'ideas', nor will the next one be. It will be about superfluous issues like the one being discussed here. The left ran out of ideas decades ago.
 
Re: Emails link top Christie aide to GWB lane-closing controversy - [W:77,109]

Because their history demonstrates this. And yes, the MSM was in the tank for Hillary before they were in the tank for Obama. The fact that the MSM is 'in the tank' for any politician doesn't seem to disturb you at all. This is probably why leftists are called 'low information voters'.
The people chose Barack Obama and the MSM followed. Why can't Republicans do the same? Why can't they nominate a candidate to get the people excited enough to control the MSM? And why do you presume that this is a pre-emptive attack in order to pave the way for Hillary? Sounds like a whole lot of whining. Take personal responsibility for your candidates.
 
Back
Top Bottom