The point is to kill him, if it's "untested" and he survives then just shoot up his skull, he won't survive that.
Last edited by digsbe; 01-05-14 at 04:06 PM.
Tired of elections being between the lesser of two evils.When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser. -Socrates
We can never be entirely sure who is guilty and who isn't, so any criminal who is convicted (based only on reasonable doubt, as opposed to a sure-knowing, which is impossible) should not be killed.
I can invert your emotive tone by saying why should an innocent person die at the hands of an archaic and brutal practice?