They call intelligent design a "Scientific Theory". Their entire motive is to promote Intelligent Design . . . the entire scientific motive behind evolution has been to disprove it . . . that is how science works. One guy makes a discovery and another tries to prove him wrong. While those rallying behind intelligent design, and who want to equate it with science, spend their entire time manipulating information to fit their view.THE CENTER FOR SCIENCE AND CULTURE Started in 1996, the Center for Science and Culture is a Discovery Institute program which:
supports research by scientists and other scholars challenging various aspects of neo-Darwinian theory;
supports research by scientists and other scholars developing the scientific theory known as intelligent design;
supports research by scientists and scholars in the social sciences and humanities exploring the impact of scientific materialism on culture.
encourages schools to improve science education by teaching students more fully about the theory of evolution, including the theory's scientific weaknesses as well is its strengths.
I reject evolution. I think it's crap.
Also, did you know that there was once a debate between two guys named Wilberforce and Huxley, and Wilberforce asked Huxley "Was it through your grandmother or your grandfather that you're descended from a monkey?"
Just thought I'd throw that historical gem out there for the sake of knowledge.
Also, did you know that there is an Australopithecus named Lucy who some believe is an ancestor of us all? Far out huh?
If people do are do not believe in evolution, is irrelevant, and impacts almost no one.
I would more concerned about the number of people who believe the Goverment
is the solution to their problems.