• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

'Duck Dynasty': A&E warned Phil Robertson about speaking out too much [W:1111]

Status
Not open for further replies.
apdst said:
He doesn't need to, in case you haven't heard.

I wonder what GLAAD has up their sleeve, now?
Click to expand...

No, because his job is more forgiving than the rest of us and so no one should weep for his difficulties. Though they were all the result of his decision.

I'm sure whatever GLAAD does next, it will be to advocate for the rights of the LGBT community.
 
Excon said:
:lamo

More denial and deflection. I bet this continues.

Your assertions were wrong, as shown.
Click to expand...

FACTS:

no content in MY conversation was ignored, if you disagree post factual proof
no assumption were made by ME, if you disagree post factual proof

your two statements are wrong.
"Stating they are sins, is not making a comparison."
"and you would also be wrong if you are asserting that he equated the two behaviors"

PROOF:


Comparison
: the act of suggesting that two or more things are similar ]or in the same category
Comparison - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

he put them all in the same category thus factually comparing them

: to treat, represent, or regard as equal, equivalent, or comparable
Equate - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

he did treat them, represent them and regard them as comparable sins

Facts, links and definitions destroy your two statements and prove them wrong, as always, I ASK AGAIN, if you disagree simply post any facts you have that prove otherwise and simply quote me making the assumptions made up

one shred of factual evidence you cant do it
 
By J ~ FACTS:

no content in MY conversation was ignored, if you disagree post factual proof
no assumption were made by ME, if you disagree post factual proof

your two statements are wrong.
"Stating they are sins, is not making a comparison."
"and you would also be wrong if you are asserting that he equated the two behaviors"

PROOF:

Comparison
: the act of suggesting that two or more things are similar ]or in the same category
Comparison - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

he put them all in the same category thus factually comparing them

: to treat, represent, or regard as equal, equivalent, or comparable
Equate - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

he did treat them, represent them and regard them as comparable sins

Facts, links and definitions destroy your two statements and prove them wrong, as always, I ASK AGAIN, if you disagree simply post any facts you have that prove otherwise and simply quote me making the assumptions made up

one shred of factual evidence you cant do it​

See I was right. More deflection and denial. I bet this still continues.

Your assertions were wrong, as shown. So stop with the untruths.
 
Boo Radley said:
1) the question was a comparison. He answered it. It's a comparison.
Click to expand...
Stop being silly.
No it wasn't.
He was not asked to compare anything. He was not asked to compare then to now, or then to the days of slavery or any other absurd thing you assert.

He was asked about his personal experience of a specific time period.


Boo Radley said:
2) standard contract. Without reports an intelligent person would assume it's there. However, we have two reports. That's enough.
Click to expand...
As was said, that is your assumption. I do not dispute that,

But that is not what was asked for.
Again. Provide the clause.
 
Excon said:
By J ~ FACTS:

no content in MY conversation was ignored, if you disagree post factual proof
no assumption were made by ME, if you disagree post factual proof

your two statements are wrong.
"Stating they are sins, is not making a comparison."
"and you would also be wrong if you are asserting that he equated the two behaviors"

PROOF:

Comparison
: the act of suggesting that two or more things are similar ]or in the same category
Comparison - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

he put them all in the same category thus factually comparing them

: to treat, represent, or regard as equal, equivalent, or comparable
Equate - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

he did treat them, represent them and regard them as comparable sins

Facts, links and definitions destroy your two statements and prove them wrong, as always, I ASK AGAIN, if you disagree simply post any facts you have that prove otherwise and simply quote me making the assumptions made up

one shred of factual evidence you cant do it​

See I was right. More deflection and denial. I bet this still continues.

Your assertions were wrong, as shown. So stop with the untruths.
Click to expand...

FACTS:

no content in MY conversation was ignored, if you disagree post factual proof
no assumption were made by ME, if you disagree post factual proof

your two statements are wrong.
"Stating they are sins, is not making a comparison."
"and you would also be wrong if you are asserting that he equated the two behaviors"

PROOF:


Comparison
: the act of suggesting that two or more things are similar ]or in the same category
Comparison - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

he put them all in the same category thus factually comparing them

: to treat, represent, or regard as equal, equivalent, or comparable
Equate - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

he did treat them, represent them and regard them as comparable sins

Facts, links and definitions destroy your two statements and prove them wrong, as always, I ASK AGAIN, if you disagree simply post any facts you have that prove otherwise and simply quote me making the assumptions made up

one shred of factual evidence you cant do it
 
By J ~ FACTS:

no content in MY conversation was ignored, if you disagree post factual proof
no assumption were made by ME, if you disagree post factual proof

your two statements are wrong.
"Stating they are sins, is not making a comparison."
"and you would also be wrong if you are asserting that he equated the two behaviors"

PROOF:

Comparison
: the act of suggesting that two or more things are similar ]or in the same category
Comparison - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

he put them all in the same category thus factually comparing them

: to treat, represent, or regard as equal, equivalent, or comparable
Equate - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

he did treat them, represent them and regard them as comparable sins

Facts, links and definitions destroy your two statements and prove them wrong, as always, I ASK AGAIN, if you disagree simply post any facts you have that prove otherwise and simply quote me making the assumptions made up

one shred of factual evidence you cant do it​

Called it again.

Just more deflection and denial. I bet this still continues.

Your assertions were wrong, as shown. So stop with the untruths.

The constant ignoring of the relevant facts makes your postings wrong each and every time.

Fact: You were already told that they both being sins was not the comparison being discussed or the alleged comparison that has folks in an uproar.
You assumed and were wrong because of the assumption
He did not equate homosexuality to bestiality. Saying so is a lie. He made no such comparison.
He said they were sins. That is all.​
 
Excon said:
By J ~ FACTS:

no content in MY conversation was ignored, if you disagree post factual proof
no assumption were made by ME, if you disagree post factual proof

your two statements are wrong.
"Stating they are sins, is not making a comparison."
"and you would also be wrong if you are asserting that he equated the two behaviors"

PROOF:

Comparison
: the act of suggesting that two or more things are similar ]or in the same category
Comparison - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

he put them all in the same category thus factually comparing them

: to treat, represent, or regard as equal, equivalent, or comparable
Equate - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

he did treat them, represent them and regard them as comparable sins

Facts, links and definitions destroy your two statements and prove them wrong, as always, I ASK AGAIN, if you disagree simply post any facts you have that prove otherwise and simply quote me making the assumptions made up

one shred of factual evidence you cant do it​

Called it again.

Just more deflection and denial. I bet this still continues.

Your assertions were wrong, as shown. So stop with the untruths.

The constant ignoring of the relevant facts makes your postings wrong each and every time.

Fact: You were already told that they both being sins was not the comparison being discussed or the alleged comparison that has folks in an uproar.
You assumed and were wrong because of the assumption
He did not equate homosexuality to bestiality. Saying so is a lie. He made no such comparison.
He said they were sins. That is all.​
Click to expand...

FACTS:

no content in MY conversation was ignored, if you disagree post factual proof
no assumption were made by ME, if you disagree post factual proof

your two statements are wrong.
"Stating they are sins, is not making a comparison."
"and you would also be wrong if you are asserting that he equated the two behaviors"

PROOF:


Comparison
: the act of suggesting that two or more things are similar ]or in the same category
Comparison - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

he put them all in the same category thus factually comparing them

: to treat, represent, or regard as equal, equivalent, or comparable
Equate - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

he did treat them, represent them and regard them as comparable sins

Facts, links and definitions destroy your two statements and prove them wrong again, as always, I ASK AGAIN, if you disagree simply post any facts you have that prove otherwise and simply quote me making the assumptions made up

one shred of factual evidence you cant do it
 
By J ~ FACTS:

no content in MY conversation was ignored, if you disagree post factual proof
no assumption were made by ME, if you disagree post factual proof

your two statements are wrong.
"Stating they are sins, is not making a comparison."
"and you would also be wrong if you are asserting that he equated the two behaviors"

PROOF:


Comparison
: the act of suggesting that two or more things are similar ]or in the same category
Comparison - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

he put them all in the same category thus factually comparing them

: to treat, represent, or regard as equal, equivalent, or comparable
Equate - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

he did treat them, represent them and regard them as comparable sins

Facts, links and definitions destroy your two statements and prove them wrong again, as always, I ASK AGAIN, if you disagree simply post any facts you have that prove otherwise and simply quote me making the assumptions made up​

Still with the nonsense I see.

Your assertions were wrong, as shown. So stop with the untruths.
Just more deflection and denial. I bet this still continues.


The constant ignoring of the relevant facts makes your postings wrong each and every time.

Fact: You were already told that they both being sins was not the comparison being discussed or the alleged comparison that has folks in an uproar.
You assumed and were wrong because of the assumption
He did not equate homosexuality to bestiality. Saying so is a lie. He made no such comparison.
He said they were sins. That is all.​
 
Excon said:
By J ~ FACTS:

no content in MY conversation was ignored, if you disagree post factual proof
no assumption were made by ME, if you disagree post factual proof

your two statements are wrong.
"Stating they are sins, is not making a comparison."
"and you would also be wrong if you are asserting that he equated the two behaviors"

PROOF:


Comparison
: the act of suggesting that two or more things are similar ]or in the same category
Comparison - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

he put them all in the same category thus factually comparing them

: to treat, represent, or regard as equal, equivalent, or comparable
Equate - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

he did treat them, represent them and regard them as comparable sins

Facts, links and definitions destroy your two statements and prove them wrong again, as always, I ASK AGAIN, if you disagree simply post any facts you have that prove otherwise and simply quote me making the assumptions made up​

Still with the nonsense I see.

Your assertions were wrong, as shown. So stop with the untruths.
Just more deflection and denial. I bet this still continues.


The constant ignoring of the relevant facts makes your postings wrong each and every time.

Fact: You were already told that they both being sins was not the comparison being discussed or the alleged comparison that has folks in an uproar.
You assumed and were wrong because of the assumption
He did not equate homosexuality to bestiality. Saying so is a lie. He made no such comparison.
He said they were sins. That is all.​
Click to expand...

FACTS:

no content in MY conversation was ignored, if you disagree post factual proof
no assumption were made by ME, if you disagree post factual proof

your two statements are wrong.
"Stating they are sins, is not making a comparison."
"and you would also be wrong if you are asserting that he equated the two behaviors"

PROOF:


Comparison
: the act of suggesting that two or more things are similar ]or in the same category
Comparison - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

he put them all in the same category thus factually comparing them

: to treat, represent, or regard as equal, equivalent, or comparable
Equate - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

he did treat them, represent them and regard them as comparable sins

Facts, links and definitions destroy your two statements and prove them wrong AGAIN, as always, I ASK AGAIN, if you disagree simply post any facts you have that prove otherwise and simply quote me making the assumptions made up

one shred of factual evidence you cant do it
 
By J ~ FACTS:

no content in MY conversation was ignored, if you disagree post factual proof
no assumption were made by ME, if you disagree post factual proof

your two statements are wrong.
"Stating they are sins, is not making a comparison."
"and you would also be wrong if you are asserting that he equated the two behaviors"

PROOF:


Comparison
: the act of suggesting that two or more things are similar ]or in the same category
Comparison - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

he put them all in the same category thus factually comparing them

: to treat, represent, or regard as equal, equivalent, or comparable
Equate - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

he did treat them, represent them and regard them as comparable sins

Facts, links and definitions destroy your two statements and prove them wrong AGAIN, as always, I ASK AGAIN, if you disagree simply post any facts you have that prove otherwise and simply quote me making the assumptions made up

one shred of factual evidence you cant do it​
Your assertions are still factually wrong. As shown. That isn't going to change.

It is also clear I called it again. Just more deflection and denial. I bet this will still continue.
 
Excon said:
By J ~ FACTS:

no content in MY conversation was ignored, if you disagree post factual proof
no assumption were made by ME, if you disagree post factual proof

your two statements are wrong.
"Stating they are sins, is not making a comparison."
"and you would also be wrong if you are asserting that he equated the two behaviors"

PROOF:


Comparison
: the act of suggesting that two or more things are similar ]or in the same category
Comparison - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

he put them all in the same category thus factually comparing them

: to treat, represent, or regard as equal, equivalent, or comparable
Equate - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

he did treat them, represent them and regard them as comparable sins

Facts, links and definitions destroy your two statements and prove them wrong AGAIN, as always, I ASK AGAIN, if you disagree simply post any facts you have that prove otherwise and simply quote me making the assumptions made up

one shred of factual evidence you cant do it​
Your assertions are still factually wrong. As shown. That isn't going to change.

It is also clear I called it again. Just more deflection and denial. I bet this will still continue.
Click to expand...

FACTS:

no content in MY conversation was ignored, if you disagree post factual proof
no assumption were made by ME, if you disagree post factual proof

your two statements are wrong.
"Stating they are sins, is not making a comparison."
"and you would also be wrong if you are asserting that he equated the two behaviors"

PROOF:


Comparison
: the act of suggesting that two or more things are similar ]or in the same category
Comparison - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

he put them all in the same category thus factually comparing them

: to treat, represent, or regard as equal, equivalent, or comparable
Equate - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

he did treat them, represent them and regard them as comparable sins

Facts, links and definitions destroy your two statements and prove them wrong, as always, I ASK AGAIN, if you disagree simply post any facts you have that prove otherwise and simply quote me making the assumptions made up

one shred of factual evidence you cant do it
 
By J ~ FACTS:

no content in MY conversation was ignored, if you disagree post factual proof
no assumption were made by ME, if you disagree post factual proof

your two statements are wrong.
"Stating they are sins, is not making a comparison."
"and you would also be wrong if you are asserting that he equated the two behaviors"

PROOF:


Comparison
: the act of suggesting that two or more things are similar ]or in the same category
Comparison - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

he put them all in the same category thus factually comparing them

: to treat, represent, or regard as equal, equivalent, or comparable
Equate - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

he did treat them, represent them and regard them as comparable sins

Facts, links and definitions destroy your two statements and prove them wrong, as always, I ASK AGAIN, if you disagree simply post any facts you have that prove otherwise and simply quote me making the assumptions made up

one shred of factual evidence you cant do it​
You keep spouting nonsense.
You were already shown to be wrong.

And your assertions are still factually wrong. As shown. That isn't going to change.

It is also clear I called it again. Just more deflection and denial. I bet this will still continue.

The constant ignoring of the facts makes your postings wrong each & every time.

Fact: You were already told that they both being sins was not the comparison being discussed or the alleged comparison that has folks in an uproar.
You assumed and were wrong because of the assumption
He did not equate homosexuality to bestiality. Saying so is a lie. He made no such comparison.
He said they were sins. That is all.​
 
Excon said:
By J ~ FACTS:

no content in MY conversation was ignored, if you disagree post factual proof
no assumption were made by ME, if you disagree post factual proof

your two statements are wrong.
"Stating they are sins, is not making a comparison."
"and you would also be wrong if you are asserting that he equated the two behaviors"

PROOF:


Comparison
: the act of suggesting that two or more things are similar ]or in the same category
Comparison - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

he put them all in the same category thus factually comparing them

: to treat, represent, or regard as equal, equivalent, or comparable
Equate - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

he did treat them, represent them and regard them as comparable sins

Facts, links and definitions destroy your two statements and prove them wrong, as always, I ASK AGAIN, if you disagree simply post any facts you have that prove otherwise and simply quote me making the assumptions made up

one shred of factual evidence you cant do it​
You keep spouting nonsense.
You were already shown to be wrong.

And your assertions are still factually wrong. As shown. That isn't going to change.

It is also clear I called it again. Just more deflection and denial. I bet this will still continue.

The constant ignoring of the facts makes your postings wrong each & every time.

Fact: You were already told that they both being sins was not the comparison being discussed or the alleged comparison that has folks in an uproar.
You assumed and were wrong because of the assumption
He did not equate homosexuality to bestiality. Saying so is a lie. He made no such comparison.
He said they were sins. That is all.​
Click to expand...

FACTS:

no content in MY conversation was ignored, if you disagree post factual proof
no assumption were made by ME, if you disagree post factual proof

your two statements are wrong.
"Stating they are sins, is not making a comparison."
"and you would also be wrong if you are asserting that he equated the two behaviors"

PROOF:


Comparison
: the act of suggesting that two or more things are similar ]or in the same category
Comparison - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

he put them all in the same category thus factually comparing them

: to treat, represent, or regard as equal, equivalent, or comparable
Equate - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

he did treat them, represent them and regard them as comparable sins

Facts, links and definitions destroy your two statements and prove them wrong, as always, I ASK AGAIN, if you disagree simply post any facts you have that prove otherwise and simply quote me making the assumptions made up

one shred of factual evidence you cant do it
 
By J ~ FACTS:

no content in MY conversation was ignored, if you disagree post factual proof
no assumption were made by ME, if you disagree post factual proof

your two statements are wrong.
"Stating they are sins, is not making a comparison."
"and you would also be wrong if you are asserting that he equated the two behaviors"

PROOF:


Comparison
: the act of suggesting that two or more things are similar ]or in the same category
Comparison - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

he put them all in the same category thus factually comparing them

: to treat, represent, or regard as equal, equivalent, or comparable
Equate - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

he did treat them, represent them and regard them as comparable sins

Facts, links and definitions destroy your two statements and prove them wrong, as always, I ASK AGAIN, if you disagree simply post any facts you have that prove otherwise and simply quote me making the assumptions made up

one shred of factual evidence you cant do it​
More dishonesty.

Your assertions are still factually wrong. As shown. That isn't going to change.

Just more deflection and denial.

The constant ignoring of the facts makes your postings wrong. Each & every time.

Fact: You were already told that they both being sins was not the comparison being discussed or the alleged comparison that has folks in an uproar.
You assumed and were wrong because of the assumption
He did not equate homosexuality to bestiality. Saying so is a lie. He made no such comparison.
He said they were sins. That is all.​
 
Excon said:
By J ~ FACTS:

no content in MY conversation was ignored, if you disagree post factual proof
no assumption were made by ME, if you disagree post factual proof

your two statements are wrong.
"Stating they are sins, is not making a comparison."
"and you would also be wrong if you are asserting that he equated the two behaviors"

PROOF:


Comparison
: the act of suggesting that two or more things are similar ]or in the same category
Comparison - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

he put them all in the same category thus factually comparing them

: to treat, represent, or regard as equal, equivalent, or comparable
Equate - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

he did treat them, represent them and regard them as comparable sins

Facts, links and definitions destroy your two statements and prove them wrong, as always, I ASK AGAIN, if you disagree simply post any facts you have that prove otherwise and simply quote me making the assumptions made up

one shred of factual evidence you cant do it​
More dishonesty.

Your assertions are still factually wrong. As shown. That isn't going to change.

Just more deflection and denial.

The constant ignoring of the facts makes your postings wrong. Each & every time.

Fact: You were already told that they both being sins was not the comparison being discussed or the alleged comparison that has folks in an uproar.
You assumed and were wrong because of the assumption
He did not equate homosexuality to bestiality. Saying so is a lie. He made no such comparison.
He said they were sins. That is all.​
Click to expand...

FACTS:

no content in MY conversation was ignored, if you disagree post factual proof
no assumption were made by ME, if you disagree post factual proof

your two statements are wrong.
"Stating they are sins, is not making a comparison."
"and you would also be wrong if you are asserting that he equated the two behaviors"

PROOF:


Comparison
: the act of suggesting that two or more things are similar ]or in the same category
Comparison - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

he put them all in the same category thus factually comparing them

: to treat, represent, or regard as equal, equivalent, or comparable
Equate - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

he did treat them, represent them and regard them as comparable sins

Facts, links and definitions destroy your two statements and prove them wrong, as always, I ASK AGAIN, if you disagree simply post any facts you have that prove otherwise and simply quote me making the assumptions made up

one shred of factual evidence you cant do it
 
By J ~ FACTS:

no content in MY conversation was ignored, if you disagree post factual proof
no assumption were made by ME, if you disagree post factual proof

your two statements are wrong.
"Stating they are sins, is not making a comparison."
"and you would also be wrong if you are asserting that he equated the two behaviors"

PROOF:


Comparison
: the act of suggesting that two or more things are similar ]or in the same category
Comparison - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

he put them all in the same category thus factually comparing them

: to treat, represent, or regard as equal, equivalent, or comparable
Equate - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

he did treat them, represent them and regard them as comparable sins

Facts, links and definitions destroy your two statements and prove them wrong, as always, I ASK AGAIN, if you disagree simply post any facts you have that prove otherwise and simply quote me making the assumptions made up

one shred of factual evidence you cant do it​
:lamo
Give it up J.
You have already been shown to be wrong. That isn't going to change.
 
Excon said:
By J ~ FACTS:

no content in MY conversation was ignored, if you disagree post factual proof
no assumption were made by ME, if you disagree post factual proof

your two statements are wrong.
"Stating they are sins, is not making a comparison."
"and you would also be wrong if you are asserting that he equated the two behaviors"

PROOF:


Comparison
: the act of suggesting that two or more things are similar ]or in the same category
Comparison - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

he put them all in the same category thus factually comparing them

: to treat, represent, or regard as equal, equivalent, or comparable
Equate - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

he did treat them, represent them and regard them as comparable sins

Facts, links and definitions destroy your two statements and prove them wrong, as always, I ASK AGAIN, if you disagree simply post any facts you have that prove otherwise and simply quote me making the assumptions made up

one shred of factual evidence you cant do it​
:lamo
Give it up J.
You have already been shown to be wrong. That isn't going to change.
Click to expand...

FACTS:

no content in MY conversation was ignored, if you disagree post factual proof
no assumption were made by ME, if you disagree post factual proof

your two statements are wrong.
"Stating they are sins, is not making a comparison."
"and you would also be wrong if you are asserting that he equated the two behaviors"

PROOF:


Comparison
: the act of suggesting that two or more things are similar ]or in the same category
Comparison - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

he put them all in the same category thus factually comparing them

: to treat, represent, or regard as equal, equivalent, or comparable
Equate - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

he did treat them, represent them and regard them as comparable sins

Facts, links and definitions destroy your two statements and prove them wrong, as always, I ASK AGAIN, if you disagree simply post any facts you have that prove otherwise and simply quote me making the assumptions made up

one shred of factual evidence you cant do it
 
By J ~ FACTS:

no content in MY conversation was ignored, if you disagree post factual proof
no assumption were made by ME, if you disagree post factual proof

your two statements are wrong.
"Stating they are sins, is not making a comparison."
"and you would also be wrong if you are asserting that he equated the two behaviors"

PROOF:


Comparison
: the act of suggesting that two or more things are similar ]or in the same category
Comparison - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

he put them all in the same category thus factually comparing them

: to treat, represent, or regard as equal, equivalent, or comparable
Equate - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

he did treat them, represent them and regard them as comparable sins

Facts, links and definitions destroy your two statements and prove them wrong, as always, I ASK AGAIN, if you disagree simply post any facts you have that prove otherwise and simply quote me making the assumptions made up

one shred of factual evidence you cant do it
​
:lamo
Your assertions are still wrong. As shown. That isn't going to change.
 
Excon said:
By J ~ FACTS:

no content in MY conversation was ignored, if you disagree post factual proof
no assumption were made by ME, if you disagree post factual proof

your two statements are wrong.
"Stating they are sins, is not making a comparison."
"and you would also be wrong if you are asserting that he equated the two behaviors"

PROOF:


Comparison
: the act of suggesting that two or more things are similar ]or in the same category
Comparison - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

he put them all in the same category thus factually comparing them

: to treat, represent, or regard as equal, equivalent, or comparable
Equate - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

he did treat them, represent them and regard them as comparable sins

Facts, links and definitions destroy your two statements and prove them wrong, as always, I ASK AGAIN, if you disagree simply post any facts you have that prove otherwise and simply quote me making the assumptions made up

one shred of factual evidence you cant do it
​
:lamo
Your assertions are still wrong. As shown. That isn't going to change.
Click to expand...

FACTS:

no content in MY conversation was ignored, if you disagree post factual proof
no assumption were made by ME, if you disagree post factual proof

your two statements are wrong.
"Stating they are sins, is not making a comparison."
"and you would also be wrong if you are asserting that he equated the two behaviors"

PROOF:


Comparison
: the act of suggesting that two or more things are similar ]or in the same category
Comparison - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

he put them all in the same category thus factually comparing them

: to treat, represent, or regard as equal, equivalent, or comparable
Equate - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

he did treat them, represent them and regard them as comparable sins

Facts, links and definitions destroy your two statements and prove them wrong, as always, I ASK AGAIN, if you disagree simply post any facts you have that prove otherwise and simply quote me making the assumptions made up

one shred of factual evidence you cant do it
 
By J ~ FACTS:
no content in MY conversation was ignored, if you disagree post factual proof
no assumption were made by ME, if you disagree post factual proof

your two statements are wrong.
"Stating they are sins, is not making a comparison."
"and you would also be wrong if you are asserting that he equated the two behaviors"

PROOF:
Comparison
: the act of suggesting that two or more things are similar ]or in the same category
Comparison - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

he put them all in the same category thus factually comparing them

: to treat, represent, or regard as equal, equivalent, or comparable
Equate - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

he did treat them, represent them and regard them as comparable sins

Facts, links and definitions destroy your two statements and prove them wrong, as always, I ASK AGAIN, if you disagree simply post any facts you have that prove otherwise and simply quote me making the assumptions made up

one shred of factual evidence you cant do it ​
:lamo
Still wrong. As shown. Why you think that will change is beyond me.
Your assertions are wrong.
 
Excon said:
By J ~ FACTS:
no content in MY conversation was ignored, if you disagree post factual proof
no assumption were made by ME, if you disagree post factual proof

your two statements are wrong.
"Stating they are sins, is not making a comparison."
"and you would also be wrong if you are asserting that he equated the two behaviors"

PROOF:
Comparison
: the act of suggesting that two or more things are similar ]or in the same category
Comparison - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

he put them all in the same category thus factually comparing them

: to treat, represent, or regard as equal, equivalent, or comparable
Equate - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

he did treat them, represent them and regard them as comparable sins

Facts, links and definitions destroy your two statements and prove them wrong, as always, I ASK AGAIN, if you disagree simply post any facts you have that prove otherwise and simply quote me making the assumptions made up

one shred of factual evidence you cant do it ​
:lamo
Still wrong. As shown. Why you think that will change is beyond me.
Your assertions are wrong.
Click to expand...

FACTS:
no content was ignored by ME
no assumption were made by ME
no assertions were made by ME
YOUR two statements were factually wrong

As usual facts, links and definitions destroy your posts and prove them wrong

as always, I ASK AGAIN, if you disagree simply stay on topic, stay civil and post any facts/links/quotes you have that prove otherwise, you can't and you won't
 
By J ~ FACTS:
no content was ignored by ME
no assumption were made by ME
no assertions were made by ME
YOUR two statements were factually wrong

As usual facts, links and definitions destroy your posts and prove them wrong

as always, I ASK AGAIN, if you disagree simply stay on topic, stay civil and post any facts/links/quotes you have that prove otherwise, you can't and you won't​
:lamo
Still in denial I see. :doh

Yes J, we get it. Your assertions have been shown to be wrong and you are not going to stop posting your silly replies.
We get that.

And you are just going to continue with the bs. It is predictable.
We get that.
It truly is a shame.

Like I previously said.
It is a game.
 
Excon said:
By J ~ FACTS:
no content was ignored by ME
no assumption were made by ME
no assertions were made by ME
YOUR two statements were factually wrong

As usual facts, links and definitions destroy your posts and prove them wrong

as always, I ASK AGAIN, if you disagree simply stay on topic, stay civil and post any facts/links/quotes you have that prove otherwise, you can't and you won't​
:lamo
Still in denial I see. :doh

Yes J, we get it. Your assertions have been shown to be wrong and you are not going to stop posting your silly replies.
We get that.

And you are just going to continue with the bs. It is predictable.
We get that.
It truly is a shame.

Like I previously said.
It is a game.
Click to expand...

Again I am not the topic stay on topic.

FACTS:
no content was ignored by ME
no assumption were made by ME
no assertions were made by ME
YOUR two statements were factually wrong

As usual facts, links and definitions destroy your posts and prove them wrong

as always, I ASK AGAIN, if you disagree simply stay on topic, stay civil and post any facts/links/quotes you have that prove otherwise, you can't and you won't
 
By J ~ FACTS:
no content was ignored by ME
no assumption were made by ME
no assertions were made by ME
YOUR two statements were factually wrong

As usual facts, links and definitions destroy your posts and prove them wrong

as always, I ASK AGAIN, if you disagree simply stay on topic, stay civil and post any facts/links/quotes you have that prove otherwise, you can't and you won't​
:lamo

The facts have not changed.
You are still wrong.

Fact: You were already told that they both being sins was not the comparison being discussed or the alleged comparison that has folks in an uproar.
You assumed and were wrong because of the assumption
He did not equate homosexuality to bestiality. Saying so is a lie. He made no such comparison.
He said they were sins. That is all.​
 
Excon said:
By J ~ FACTS:
no content was ignored by ME
no assumption were made by ME
no assertions were made by ME
YOUR two statements were factually wrong

As usual facts, links and definitions destroy your posts and prove them wrong

as always, I ASK AGAIN, if you disagree simply stay on topic, stay civil and post any facts/links/quotes you have that prove otherwise, you can't and you won't​
:lamo

The facts have not changed.
You are still wrong.

Fact: You were already told that they both being sins was not the comparison being discussed or the alleged comparison that has folks in an uproar.
You assumed and were wrong because of the assumption
He did not equate homosexuality to bestiality. Saying so is a lie. He made no such comparison.
He said they were sins. That is all.​
Click to expand...

FACTS:
no content was ignored by ME
no assumption were made by ME
no assertions were made by ME
YOUR two statements were factually wrong

As usual facts, links and definitions destroy your posts and prove them wrong

as always, I ASK AGAIN, if you disagree simply stay on topic, stay civil and post any facts/links/quotes you have that prove otherwise, you can't and you won't
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom