• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

'Duck Dynasty': A&E warned Phil Robertson about speaking out too much [W:1111]

Status
Not open for further replies.
re: 'Duck Dynasty': A&E warned Phil Robertson about speaking out too much [W:1111]

I think he meant what he said. I think he is right too. People manage to seek out and find happiness even in the most trying of times. You should try operating on that level sometime. When you start reading into what you think people meant you look like an idiot and all you do is smear your own personal hatred and bigotry over every subject you discuss.
Well, when someone says blacks were happy picking cotton prior to civil rights in the Jim Crow South, I take issue. Sad to hear you, with all your claimed religious enlightenment, find remarks like that acceptable.



And Calamity has Godwined another thread.
Hey. They all had nice things to say too.
 
re: 'Duck Dynasty': A&E warned Phil Robertson about speaking out too much [W:1111]

I would think the proper response is to distance oneself from such speech and the person saying it. But, hey, that's just my opinion.

I feel the same way when the stupid, dogmatic portion of the left gets confused with liberals.

Hate filled, bible thumping hillbillies are certainly part of the right, though they do not represent it much like anti-American Jihadist apologists are part of the left, but do not represent it, either.
 
re: 'Duck Dynasty': A&E warned Phil Robertson about speaking out too much [W:1111]

I may have mentioned before that there is nothing "correct" about the "right" if used in context..
I like using the suffix -ist to the right, as in "right-ist", following the rightist lead as they use Mao-ist and left-ist..
Prefixes like arch- and ultra- now enter..

I'm now moving to RITE-ist, as RITE refers to a pagan..
As my wife pointed out, Duckk doesn't even measure up to the "prodigal son", as he now sits as a judge on "lessers" .
They, Rite-ists, completely miss that point. He's judging and they say he's only expressing an opinion based on scripture. The unChristian-like judging goes whoosh, right over the heads of these people.
 
re: 'Duck Dynasty': A&E warned Phil Robertson about speaking out too much [W:1111]

Seriously? You know if they get married at 16 they're having sex at 16 - at least after marriage.

Yes, I do. I think that sex in a committed marriage is better than sex outside of marriage, hence my statement that being married at 16 is preferable to sleeping around at 16.

And marriage - you're saying it's better if someone at age 16 who doesn't really have a clue what they will end up doing gets married (so they can have sex) - a technically lifetime commitment - rather than have some sex (protected) and give themselves time to find out who they are and what they want to be.

Yes, that is what I am saying. I would rather they abstain from sex until marriage and get married in their 20s, but we aren't discussing what I think would be ideal.

There is something to be said for marrying young, though, since the older you get the more locked in your ways you become and the harder it gets to find someone to share your life with. If you marry young, you will develop your personality with the person you will be living the rest of your life with. There is something to said for marrying your high school sweetheart.

Yes, some couples that get married at 16 work out. Lots don't.

Same could be said for getting married at any age.

I would hate to see a 16 yr old getting married; it's too permanent a commitment.

Your life's true pleasures, and the path to true happiness, reside in the lifelong commitments.
 
re: 'Duck Dynasty': A&E warned Phil Robertson about speaking out too much [W:1111]

Still denying four separate historically documented "spikes" in racism beginning with the Civil war ?
Still seeing that which is not there. How sad.
 
re: 'Duck Dynasty': A&E warned Phil Robertson about speaking out too much [W:1111]

I feel the same way when the stupid, dogmatic portion of the left gets confused with liberals.

Hate filled, bible thumping hillbillies are certainly part of the right, though they do not represent it much like anti-American Jihadist apologists are part of the left, but do not represent it, either.
Ditto with Gay Pride Parade chap-wearing flamboyant homosexuals are not representative of all gays. But, they will always be brought up whenever gay rights are discussed.
 
re: 'Duck Dynasty': A&E warned Phil Robertson about speaking out too much [W:1111]

Yes, I do. I think that sex in a committed marriage is better than sex outside of marriage, hence my statement that being married at 16 is preferable to sleeping around at 16.



Yes, that is what I am saying. I would rather they abstain from sex until marriage and get married in their 20s, but we aren't discussing what I think would be ideal.

There is something to be said for marrying young, though, since the older you get the more locked in your ways you become and the harder it gets to find someone to share your life with. If you marry young, you will develop your personality with the person you will be living the rest of your life with. There is something to said for marrying your high school sweetheart.



Same could be said for getting married at any age.



Your life's true pleasures, and the path to true happiness, reside in the lifelong commitments.
Obviously, a 16 year old boy cannot care for a family in this day and age. So in reality, you see nothing wrong with an older man marrying a 16-year old girl. Do you prefer she remain barefoot and pregnant or can she at least finish high school?

Pretty lame that your Phil-defense has led you down the path where you now advocate Ephebophilia.
 
re: 'Duck Dynasty': A&E warned Phil Robertson about speaking out too much [W:1111]

It was shown to you repeatedly. So, stop lying.
No it wasn't, nor could it, as no comparison was made.
So you are again being dishonest, about it being shown, which is impossible, as well as the assertion to begin with.

Your assertions are nothing but the manifestations of convoluted biased thoughts.
 
re: 'Duck Dynasty': A&E warned Phil Robertson about speaking out too much [W:1111]

Still denying four separate historically documented "spikes" in racism beginning with the Civil war ?

You are speaking nonsense to what is being discussed.
It has no relevance.

Phil made no comparison.
 
re: 'Duck Dynasty': A&E warned Phil Robertson about speaking out too much [W:1111]

Yes, he said black people were happier pre-civil rights. Most of us find that, at the very least, off-putting if not downright appalling.

Well, they were happier. They were religious, happy, intact families and church going people. Sadly now the illigimitate birth rate is 80%, walking around uneducated, unemployed, angry, and running in packs causing trouble with a large % in jail and prison. I am shocked how black women allow those guys to take advantage of them, saddle them with kids and can't get an education to improve their lives or the lives of their children
The rules of advancement in getting and keeping out of poverty is:
finish High School
get a job and work hard
don't have a baby unmarried and don't get married till over 25.
 
Last edited:
re: 'Duck Dynasty': A&E warned Phil Robertson about speaking out too much [W:1111]


You are cracking me up EX... My how you are taking my post so personal...as though it was directed at you.

Oh...and your predictable "WRONG"...is....so predictable.

For those who haven't seen the REAL DUCK DYNASTY YUPPIE FAMILY PLAYING LIKE SWAMP HICKS...see my post #909!
Wrong. Nothing personal about it.

I am opposing false information, and by proxy, your dishonesty.
 
re: 'Duck Dynasty': A&E warned Phil Robertson about speaking out too much [W:1111]

Well, when someone says blacks were happy picking cotton prior to civil rights in the Jim Crow South, I take issue. Sad to hear you, with all your claimed religious enlightenment, find remarks like that acceptable.

But it's true. I have no doubt that blacks even in the midst of the Jim Crow south managed to find happiness. It's human nature.

Hey. They all had nice things to say too.

Do you place Phil Jones on the same level as Joseph Stalin and Adolph Hitler?
 
re: 'Duck Dynasty': A&E warned Phil Robertson about speaking out too much [W:1111]

Well, they were happier. They were religious, happy, intact families and church going people. Sadly now the illigimitate birth rate is 80%, walking around uneducated, unemployed, angry, and running in packs with women raising more angry kids. It's a tragedy.

Oh yeah I'm sure they were so happy without voting rights, being discriminated against and beaten to death if they even touched a white person. :roll:

Did you get your information from Stormfront?
 
re: 'Duck Dynasty': A&E warned Phil Robertson about speaking out too much [W:1111]

Wrong. Nothing personal about it.

I am opposing false information, and by proxy, your dishonesty.

Like they say, "A picture is worth a thousand words". Are you saying the Robertson's family pictures are a lie...? There is information galore on this bunch of yuppies who are playing like swamp hicks.
 
re: 'Duck Dynasty': A&E warned Phil Robertson about speaking out too much [W:1111]

But it's true. I have no doubt that blacks even in the midst of the Jim Crow south managed to find happiness. It's human nature.
uh-huh. I'm sure some slaves were happy too. Would that be the first thing you say when asked about pre Civil War America?



Do you place Phil Jones on the same level as Joseph Stalin and Adolph Hitler?

No.
 
re: 'Duck Dynasty': A&E warned Phil Robertson about speaking out too much [W:1111]

No it wasn't, nor could it, as no comparison was made.
So you are again being dishonest, about it being shown, which is impossible, as well as the assertion to begin with.

Your assertions are nothing but the manifestations of convoluted biased thoughts.

Yes it was, and it could because a direct comparison was made.
So you are again being dishonest, about it not being shown, which it was.

Your assertions are nothing but the denial of Phil's convoluted biased thoughts
 
re: 'Duck Dynasty': A&E warned Phil Robertson about speaking out too much [W:1111]

Like they say, "A picture is worth a thousand words". Are you saying the Robertson's family pictures are a lie...? There is information galore on this bunch of yuppies who are playing like swamp hicks.
No there ios such info.

So again.

He appeared the way he does now before the show was even started.

As I previously said.
"That is no more real than how they appear now."

If you haven't realized it yet. He appears the way he does now in the 2010 sermon on youtube.
How he appeared then, is how he appears now, which is in real life, and not made up for a show.

People change and/or grow into a different appearance all the time.
You have no point.


b2b86ab843ec2616844ca15dc6d42ac1239e0e9e.jpg

OMG! Willie was a yuppy before they knew what a yuppy was. My how he has changed.
D'oh!

Willie+Nelson+-+Good+Times+-+LP+RECORD-486808.jpg

willie.jpg
 
re: 'Duck Dynasty': A&E warned Phil Robertson about speaking out too much [W:1111]

Yes it was, and it could because a direct comparison was made.
So you are again being dishonest, about it not being shown, which it was.

Your assertions are nothing but the denial of Phil's convoluted biased thoughts
Stop with your dishonesty.
You can show no such comparison. It doesn't exist.

Your assertions are nothing but the manifestations of convoluted biased thoughts.
 
re: 'Duck Dynasty': A&E warned Phil Robertson about speaking out too much [W:1111]

No there ios such info.

So again.

He appeared the way he does now before the show was even started.

As I previously said.
"That is no more real than how they appear now."

If you haven't realized it yet. He appears the way he does now in the 2010 sermon on youtube.
How he appeared then, is how he appears now, which is in real life, and not made up for a show.


Okay...not a good comparison, but okay. If it's so important to you to try to continue to stick up for these yuppies playing like swamp hicks...feel free to do so
 
re: 'Duck Dynasty': A&E warned Phil Robertson about speaking out too much [W:1111]

It was shown to you repeatedly. So, stop lying.

Calamity...I've been following along with your posts. Phil Robertson is a bigot and racist. And he's all of the other things that you've described with regard to his religious fanaticism. If what Phil Robertson is claiming to represent his beliefs are based on tenet in his religion...and other within his religion aren't speaking out against his comments...then they are as bigoted and racist as he is.

And as I posted, the whole family imagine of being "swamp hicks" is a sham. The whole "cotton pickin -poor white trash" gig is a sham.

The REALITY SHOW isn't a reality...it's about a made up set of characters, which aren't in fact swamp hicks, that attract a lot of viewers, which makes the network a lot of money.

Phil pissed in his peanut butter. Now the network is pissed and rightfully so. The network pays a lot of money to the Robertson to pretend to be as they're portrayed on the show.
 
re: 'Duck Dynasty': A&E warned Phil Robertson about speaking out too much [W:1111]

Duck's words are right out of the KKK mantra of the 1920's..
Back then, the KKK opposed immigration of Eastern and Southern Europeans..
You know who Duckk/GOP/TEAts oppose now, RITE ?
You are speaking nonsense to what is being discussed.
It has no relevance.

Phil made no comparison.
 
re: 'Duck Dynasty': A&E warned Phil Robertson about speaking out too much [W:1111]

who the hell is phil robertson and what was the supposed ignorant, racist and or uneducated stuff he said?

also is he related to that bigoted moron Pat Robertson? if so that would explain a lot.
 
re: 'Duck Dynasty': A&E warned Phil Robertson about speaking out too much [W:1111]

Stop with your dishonesty.
You can show no such comparison. It doesn't exist.

Your assertions are nothing but the manifestations of convoluted biased thoughts.

Stop with your dishonesty.
I have repeatedly shown the comparison. It exists.

Your assertions are nothing but a denial of Phil's convoluted biased thoughts.
 
re: 'Duck Dynasty': A&E warned Phil Robertson about speaking out too much [W:1111]

Okay...not a good comparison, but okay. If it's so important to you to try to continue to stick up for these yuppies playing like swamp hicks...feel free to do so
:doh
As he appeared the way he does now before the show even started it is unlikely that he playing anything.
And as a hunter, his appearance is in accord.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom