• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

'Duck Dynasty': A&E warned Phil Robertson about speaking out too much [W:1111]

Status
Not open for further replies.
re: 'Duck Dynasty': A&E warned Phil Robertson about speaking out too much [W:1111]

Doesn't matter what he was asked, he answered. He made a comparison. Pre: happier. Post: not as happy. A comparison. You can't change the facts.
You are trying real hard to change the facts, but are still wrong.
He made no such comparison.
That is all a manifestation of your own delusional thoughts.
There is no comparison there. Just an answer to a question asked.
 
re: 'Duck Dynasty': A&E warned Phil Robertson about speaking out too much [W:1111]

Right, according to him Blacks were whistling ****ing Dixie in the fields. :roll:
He never said anything about Dixie.
Nor did he refer to all blacks.
Which is just a further demonstration of your deluded biased thoughts.
 
re: 'Duck Dynasty': A&E warned Phil Robertson about speaking out too much [W:1111]

He never said anything about Dixie.
Nor did he refer to all blacks.
Which is just a further demonstration of your deluded biased thoughts.

Let's see. Singing. Check. Cotton fields. Check. Blacks. Check. Where? In Dixieland.

I guess only those denying reality like you are here, repeatedly, don't get the analogy.
 
re: 'Duck Dynasty': A&E warned Phil Robertson about speaking out too much [W:1111]

You are trying real hard to change the facts, but are still wrong.
He made no such comparison.
That is all a manifestation of your own delusional thoughts.
There is no comparison there. Just an answer to a question asked.

You are bending over backwards to avoid seeing that which is in front of your nose.
 
re: 'Duck Dynasty': A&E warned Phil Robertson about speaking out too much [W:1111]

Let's see. Singing. Check. Cotton fields. Check. Blacks. Check. Where? In Dixieland.

I guess only those denying reality like you are here, repeatedly, don't get the analogy.
You must be a paid shill.
First you say "whistling ****ing Dixie " which he never said. When checked and shown you are wrong, you try to flip the script by then mentioning location which had nothing to do with what you said.

The whole position that you have taken, and dishonestly argued, is simply wrong.
 
re: 'Duck Dynasty': A&E warned Phil Robertson about speaking out too much [W:1111]

You are trying real hard to change the facts, but are still wrong.
He made no such comparison.
That is all a manifestation of your own delusional thoughts.
There is no comparison there. Just an answer to a question asked.

I'm sorry, but pre means before. This can only be a comparison. You are factually incorrect.
 
re: 'Duck Dynasty': A&E warned Phil Robertson about speaking out too much [W:1111]

You are bending over backwards to avoid seeing that which is in front of your nose.
Funny.
Your deluded and biased thoughts are not present in reality, and therefore can not be seen.
 
re: 'Duck Dynasty': A&E warned Phil Robertson about speaking out too much [W:1111]

I'm sorry, but pre means before. This can only be a comparison. You are factually incorrect.
:doh
Yes, I agree. You are sorry. I suppose it is also common knowledge. But your being sorry is irrelevant, so there is no need to bring it up.

Again with the absurdities.
Figures.
Well you are wrong again.
Pre was the time period he was asked about. He made no comparison.
 
re: 'Duck Dynasty': A&E warned Phil Robertson about speaking out too much [W:1111]

:doh
Yes, I agree. You are sorry. I suppose it is also common knowledge. But your being sorry is irrelevant, so there is no need to bring it up.

Again with the absurdities.
Figures.
Well you are wrong again.
Pre was the time period he was asked about. He made no comparison.

Yes. He was asked about the time period (an irrelevant fact). And he said than. Compared to now, they were happier. Pre (before) welfare. Comparison.
 
re: 'Duck Dynasty': A&E warned Phil Robertson about speaking out too much [W:1111]

You must be a paid shill.
First you say "whistling ****ing Dixie " which he never said. When checked and shown you are wrong, you try to flip the script by then mentioning location which had nothing to do with what you said.

The whole position that you have taken, and dishonestly argued, is simply wrong.
Right...because I wrote whistling instead of singing. :roll:

Your position is so desperate that you're grabbing at every straw you can find. Aren't ya?
 
re: 'Duck Dynasty': A&E warned Phil Robertson about speaking out too much [W:1111]

Yes. He was asked about the time period (an irrelevant fact). And he said than. Compared to now, they were happier. Pre (before) welfare. Comparison.
No he did not.
He repeated the question back to the person who asked, and then answered it with his personal experience of that specific time (which he was asked). He made no comparison.
There was no comparison, that is nothing more than a manifestation of your convoluted and biased thoughts.

You are wrong.
 
Last edited:
re: 'Duck Dynasty': A&E warned Phil Robertson about speaking out too much [W:1111]

Funny.
Your deluded and biased thoughts are not present in reality, and therefore can not be seen.
Why are you so hellbent on defending a rich homophobe who comes across as being, if not racist, at least extremely racially ignorant?
 
re: 'Duck Dynasty': A&E warned Phil Robertson about speaking out too much [W:1111]

Right...because I wrote whistling instead of singing. :roll:

Your position is so desperate that you're grabbing at every straw you can find. Aren't ya?
:doh
By position is based on facts. Yours on the other hand, is one of grabbing at make believe straws and based on your convoluted and biased thoughts.
 
re: 'Duck Dynasty': A&E warned Phil Robertson about speaking out too much [W:1111]

Why are you so hellbent on defending a rich homophobe who comes across as being, if not racist, at least extremely racially ignorant?
More irrelevant deflection.
He did nothing wrong.
So of course he needs to be defended against bigoted idiots.
 
re: 'Duck Dynasty': A&E warned Phil Robertson about speaking out too much [W:1111]

No he did not.
He repeated the question back to the person who asked, and then answered it with his personal experience of that specific time (which he was asked). He made no comparison.
There was no comparison, that is nothing more than\ a manifestation of your convoluted and biased thoughts.

You are wrong.

Again, pre (before) welfare. Repeating the question has nothing to do with it. He made the comparison.
 
re: 'Duck Dynasty': A&E warned Phil Robertson about speaking out too much [W:1111]

Yes. He was asked about the time period (an irrelevant fact). And he said than. Compared to now, they were happier. Pre (before) welfare. Comparison.

Correct. Phil was asked about blacks prior to civil rights. He answered by saying "they" were happier then than now.

Excon is just running up posts denying reality by saying the same thing over and over: He didn't say that.
 
re: 'Duck Dynasty': A&E warned Phil Robertson about speaking out too much [W:1111]

Again, pre (before) welfare. Repeating the question has nothing to do with it. He made the comparison.
Pre was the time period. No comparison was made.
And it was the question.
He was not asked to compare that time period to that of today. There was no comparison made.
 
re: 'Duck Dynasty': A&E warned Phil Robertson about speaking out too much [W:1111]

Correct. Phil was asked about blacks prior to civil rights. He answered by saying "they" were happier then than now.
That is a lie.
 
re: 'Duck Dynasty': A&E warned Phil Robertson about speaking out too much [W:1111]

More irrelevant deflection.
He did nothing wrong.
So of course he needs to be defended against bigoted idiots.

Correct. He sis not do anything wrong. But, what he said was either racist or so ass-backward that most people would distance themselves from those comments.
 
re: 'Duck Dynasty': A&E warned Phil Robertson about speaking out too much [W:1111]

But, what he said was either racist or so ass-backward that most people would distance themselves from those comments.
Wrong.
 
re: 'Duck Dynasty': A&E warned Phil Robertson about speaking out too much [W:1111]

That is a lie.
Really. Explain to me how this
Robertson continued, "Pre-entitlement, pre-welfare, you say: Were they happy? They were godly; they were happy; no one was singing the blues."
isn't saying "they" were happier then than now."

I'd love to hear it.
 
re: 'Duck Dynasty': A&E warned Phil Robertson about speaking out too much [W:1111]

Pre was the time period. No comparison was made.
And it was the question.
He was not asked to compare that time period to that of today. There was no comparison made.

Pre=before. Yes time period. Jim Crow compared to welfare. Time period. He said happier during the time if Jim Crow than post welfare. This is a comparison. It's also clear and simple understanding of language.
 
re: 'Duck Dynasty': A&E warned Phil Robertson about speaking out too much [W:1111]


Nonsense. Explain to us how it wasn't racist or ass-backwards.
 
re: 'Duck Dynasty': A&E warned Phil Robertson about speaking out too much [W:1111]

Nonsense. Explain to us how it wasn't racist or ass-backwards.

:naughty
You explain how it was.
 
re: 'Duck Dynasty': A&E warned Phil Robertson about speaking out too much [W:1111]

Really. Explain to me how this

isn't saying "they" were happier then than now."

I'd love to hear it.

Do you see anywhere in that the words "than now"?
Of course you don't. So stop making things up.

He was relating his personal experience of the time.
Nothing more.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom