- Joined
- Feb 6, 2010
- Messages
- 100,778
- Reaction score
- 53,543
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Re: Federal judge strikes down Utah’s ban on same-sex marriage
But it's your distraction. Your side is the one that keeps bringing up "gay people can't have kids with eachother!" Ok. So what? Neither can an elderly couple, so that "point" is entirely irrelevant.
You still haven't provided the state interest that justifies the gender-based classification that currently exists.
The entire thing is meaningless, I'm just pointing out a big difference. I'm arguing a states rights issue and unconstitutional federal intervention, so this is just a distraction, I don't care all that much about it and I am not using it. So you've been destroyed again. What else is new?
But it's your distraction. Your side is the one that keeps bringing up "gay people can't have kids with eachother!" Ok. So what? Neither can an elderly couple, so that "point" is entirely irrelevant.
You still haven't provided the state interest that justifies the gender-based classification that currently exists.