- Joined
- Feb 6, 2010
- Messages
- 100,778
- Reaction score
- 53,543
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Re: Federal judge strikes down Utah’s ban on same-sex marriage
Quote the relevant text of the decision.
I never said state laws didn't prevent them from marrying. Numerous times in this very thread I've said the opposite. But I'll do it again, for you, to prove to everyone how big a liar you are.
1 -Homosexuals are being discriminated against regarding the right to marry.
2 -The method chosen to do this is to define marriage as between one man and one woman.
That quote of mine from a different thread you keep parading around? It's a reference to the second line, not the first.
If you keep insisting that I claimed homosexuals aren't being prevented from marrying, proof of your lie is right here. You have all of the clarification that it is possible to give. I'm sorry to have caused you so much confusion, but here is the resolution. You know what I believe.
Several times I mentioned the Perry case and what Judge Walker said in it. It does not surprise me that you don't know that, as you appear to ignore that which you don't want to hear.
And no, the courts I quoted are not simply saying homosexuals are being discriminated against. The courts are saying, specifically, contrary to what you said, that the state laws prevent them from marrying. It is you who is being dishonest.
Yeah, there's no further point to this. Believe whatever you want; you'll still be wrong. Why it's so important to you to BE wrong, I will never understand.
Quote the relevant text of the decision.
I never said state laws didn't prevent them from marrying. Numerous times in this very thread I've said the opposite. But I'll do it again, for you, to prove to everyone how big a liar you are.
1 -Homosexuals are being discriminated against regarding the right to marry.
2 -The method chosen to do this is to define marriage as between one man and one woman.
That quote of mine from a different thread you keep parading around? It's a reference to the second line, not the first.
If you keep insisting that I claimed homosexuals aren't being prevented from marrying, proof of your lie is right here. You have all of the clarification that it is possible to give. I'm sorry to have caused you so much confusion, but here is the resolution. You know what I believe.
Last edited: