Page 145 of 152 FirstFirst ... 4595135143144145146147 ... LastLast
Results 1,441 to 1,450 of 1516

Thread: Federal judge strikes down Utah’s ban on same-sex marriage[W:780]

  1. #1441
    I'm kind of a big deal

    AGENT J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Last Seen
    Today @ 04:34 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    44,797

    Re: Federal judge strikes down Utah’s ban on same-sex marriage

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr.Nick View Post
    1.)The feds have nothing and can do nothing....

    2.)A governor with balls just needs to point that out....

    3.) As far as civil armies that adore the federal government - progressives have none. Hell, they're afraid of guns for ****s sake. When the words have been said - all they know is run to the nearest rock and hide under it.
    1.) you keep posting this lie but its been factually proven wrong
    2.) translation a criminal would end up in jail
    3.) more hyperbolic strawmen and fantasy.

    do you have anything factual to discuss?
    This space is currently owned by The Great Winchester, stay tuned for future messages!
    Make America Great Again!
    Pro-Equal Rights / Pro-Gun Rights / Pro-Human Rights / Pro-Choice

  2. #1442
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Chicago
    Last Seen
    10-30-14 @ 12:38 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    7,908

    Re: Federal judge strikes down Utah’s ban on same-sex marriage

    Quote Originally Posted by winston53660 View Post
    Ahhhh so the tyranny of the majority is fine on the state level. Seems awfully authoritarian to me.
    Do you know what the **** authoritarian means or in which context is should be used?

    Your posts are classic...

  3. #1443
    Sage
    roguenuke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Last Seen
    05-17-17 @ 05:55 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    28,935

    Re: Federal judge strikes down Utah’s ban on same-sex marriage

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr.Nick View Post
    The feds have nothing and can do nothing....

    A governor with balls just needs to point that out....

    As far as civil armies that adore the federal government - progressives have none. Hell, they're afraid of guns for ****s sake. When the words have been said - all they know is run to the nearest rock and hide under it.
    The feds have plenty and a lot of power, whether you agree or not.

    Your issue is that you want to pidgeonhole groups into particular ways of thinking. "If you approve of/support same sex marriage, you are a progressive, and therefore are anti-gun, pro-Obama/Gore, etc.", no matter the truth that people are way more diverse in their beliefs/support than this and you are highly naive if you cannot recognize this.
    "A woman is like a teabag, you never know how strong she is until she gets in hot water." - Eleanor Roosevelt

    Keep your religion out of other people's marriages.

  4. #1444
    I'm kind of a big deal

    AGENT J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Last Seen
    Today @ 04:34 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    44,797

    Re: Federal judge strikes down Utah’s ban on same-sex marriage

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr.Nick View Post
    1.)Do you know what the **** authoritarian means or in which context is should be used?

    2.)Your posts are classic...
    1.) yes we do, facts prove you do not
    2.) they are they classically prove your posts wrong.
    This space is currently owned by The Great Winchester, stay tuned for future messages!
    Make America Great Again!
    Pro-Equal Rights / Pro-Gun Rights / Pro-Human Rights / Pro-Choice

  5. #1445
    Sage
    roguenuke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Last Seen
    05-17-17 @ 05:55 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    28,935

    Re: Federal judge strikes down Utah’s ban on same-sex marriage

    Quote Originally Posted by scatt View Post
    But you just said stayed.

    The state does not recognize them because of the law.
    Current marriages have been stayed. Many have already been performed. Those were done prior to any stay in the marriages now in place. There was nothing illegal about performing those marriages and therefore those marriages are valid marriages. They cannot be voided.
    "A woman is like a teabag, you never know how strong she is until she gets in hot water." - Eleanor Roosevelt

    Keep your religion out of other people's marriages.

  6. #1446
    Sage

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Last Seen
    09-24-17 @ 04:38 AM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    29,261

    Re: Federal judge strikes down Utah’s ban on same-sex marriage

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr.Nick View Post
    Do you know what the **** authoritarian means or in which context is should be used?

    Your posts are classic...
    Can you make a post with out using the word ****? And yes I know what authoritarianism is I also know what the tyranny of the majority is.

  7. #1447
    Professor
    wolfsgirl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 08:22 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    2,140

    Re: Federal judge strikes down Utah’s ban on same-sex marriage

    Quote Originally Posted by scatt View Post
    But you just said stayed.

    The state does not recognize them because of the law.
    No, the stay prevents any MORE marriages from happening, it does not invalidate ones that have already taken place.
    " May you live as long as you wish, and love as long as you live"
    R.A. Heinlein

  8. #1448
    Guru
    scatt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Last Seen
    02-09-17 @ 10:57 AM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    4,721

    Re: Federal judge strikes down Utah’s ban on same-sex marriage

    Quote Originally Posted by wolfsgirl View Post
    No, the stay prevents any MORE marriages from happening, it does not invalidate ones that have already taken place.
    Because those marriages are not legal during the stay, sure. Which means, the other ones are not either.

  9. #1449
    Sage
    roguenuke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Last Seen
    05-17-17 @ 05:55 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    28,935

    Re: Federal judge strikes down Utah’s ban on same-sex marriage

    Quote Originally Posted by scatt View Post
    Because those marriages are not legal during the stay, sure. Which means, the other ones are not either.
    No, because it is recognized that the ruling is being challenged. It does not recognize the law as valid, only that allowing further actions based on the ruling to happen can complicate the future rulings. It is common in many rulings. The ruling is still valid and means that those other marriages are still legal marriages until a future ruling, based solely on the validity of those marriages that got in prior to the stay is made.
    "A woman is like a teabag, you never know how strong she is until she gets in hot water." - Eleanor Roosevelt

    Keep your religion out of other people's marriages.

  10. #1450
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Chicago
    Last Seen
    10-30-14 @ 12:38 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    7,908

    Re: Federal judge strikes down Utah’s ban on same-sex marriage

    Quote Originally Posted by roguenuke View Post
    The feds have plenty and a lot of power, whether you agree or not.

    Your issue is that you want to pidgeonhole groups into particular ways of thinking. "If you approve of/support same sex marriage, you are a progressive, and therefore are anti-gun, pro-Obama/Gore, etc.", no matter the truth that people are way more diverse in their beliefs/support than this and you are highly naive if you cannot recognize this.
    I could care less about the issue being discussed - I'm on a different level than that.

    The feds shouldn't be sticking their dick where it doesn't belong....

    The feds can't do a damn thing....

    If a governor told the feds to **** off the feds wouldn't know what to do - especially Obama.... They'd file lawsuits which would be moot considering they would still be in denial about what "**** off" means...

    Seriously, the feds couldn't do ****..

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •