It is not very unreasonable that the rich should contribute to the public expense, not only in proportion to their revenue, but something more than in that proportion.
"Wealth of Nations," Book V, Chapter II, Part II, Article I, pg.911
That seems more a choice for a&e, but rather irrelevant to your earlier point making the distinction between normative and positive statementsThe guy, as a representative of A&E, has no business even mentioning bestiality, let alone using it in conjunction with homosexuality to establish a moral position.
Indefinitely suspending him is merely a euphemism for being terminated from employment.
Homosexuality being sin is a known belief of Abrahamic religions, so yes, he was "suspended" for expressing his religious belief, which included a paraphrase of Corinthians.
Employers cannot fire employees for reasons that would violate anti-discrimination laws.
However, it's up to him to pursue a grievance on the issue for it to be enforced.
In matters of style, swim with the current; In matters of principle, stand like a rock.
“The reasonable man adapts himself to the world: the unreasonable one persists to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man.” ― George Bernard Shaw, Man and Superman