Last edited by Cardinal; 12-10-13 at 08:48 PM.
He may very well have promised her everything. However, you'll never prove it - neither will I, nor she. This case existed because she wanted a pot of gold at the end of her manipulation rainbow. She probably gave a convincing sob story, and played everyone for suckers.
Don't get the wrong idea, though: no matter how many thousands of times you give them, your "God, I hate women so much" spiels are always entertaining.
Last edited by Cardinal; 12-10-13 at 09:31 PM.
An agreement was made that she quit her job to be a homemaker, while he brought home the bacon.
Any pater bonus familias should be able to see that a financial loss was incurred when that agreement was broken, and that some sort of compensation therefore is warranted.
What kind of legal framework you want to dress it up in is less important than justice being served.
Ok, that does it! I waste Professor Plum with the lead pipe.
Oh yeah? Well say hello to my little friend, Colonel Mustard! Candlestick to the face!
This is the last time I'm playing Clue with you guys...
So the lesson in all of this is to keep your woman with a job.
Just kidding, everyone involved in this court case looks to be an idiot for whatever reason.