• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Colorado Judge: Bakery Owner discriminated against gay couple [W:113:123:292:647]

Re: Colorado Judge: Bakery Owner discriminated against gay couple [W:123]

Henrin;1062635620[B said:
]If you support the law then you must support involuntary servitude and thus slavery.
[/B]




You are talking to yourself.
 
Re: Colorado Judge: Bakery Owner discriminated against gay couple [W:123]

Then the decision was a correct one for that state. The state decided to add sexual orientation to their special classes and that comports fine with the US Constitution. The state is the "decider" on this issue. As repugnant as I find being forced by law to do business with those I would choose not to - this is a legitimate decision in light of the state's chosen position.

This silliness is what happens when any group gets their knickers in a knot and the courts feel they have to settle these situations.

If Gays feel they are being discriminated against by some baker then they can send reviews to Yelp, let their friends know about it, and so on. It is simply bad business for this baker to deny service to anyone and this is how he should learn his lesson and not through the courts. To say he MUST sell cakes to Gays, KKKers, Hells Angers, or any group of whom he personally disapproves is too great a step into the rights of this baker, whether we like his POV or not.
 
Re: Colorado Judge: Bakery Owner discriminated against gay couple [W:123]

That is an egregious lie for which you can provide no proof.


you are 100% correct, it is a lie and there is no proof of it

not to mention it has already factually proven there is no force and there factually is no slavery going on here


the man CHOSE to open a business and there are laws and rules that regulate this
the man CHOSE to ignore these laws and rules break the law and infringe on peoples rights

these facts wont change, maybe the dumbass will think twice next time before breaking the law
 
Re: Colorado Judge: Bakery Owner discriminated against gay couple [W:123]


You are talking to yourself.

Clearly I'm not if you are responding to me. Tell me though, how can you support forcing people into service for others and not support involuntary servitude and thus slavery?
 
Re: Colorado Judge: Bakery Owner discriminated against gay couple [W:123]

you are 100% correct, it is a lie and there is no proof of it

not to mention it has already factually proven there is no force and there factually is no slavery going on here


the man CHOSE to open a business and there are laws and rules that regulate this
the man CHOSE to ignore these laws and rules break the law and infringe on peoples rights

these facts wont change, maybe the dumbass will think twice next time before breaking the law

If the congrgation of the Westboro Baptist Church or the KKK came into my restaurant for coffee and donuts I wouldn't serve them because I feel that would be my right. It seems you would serve them, which stems from a law you support.
 
Re: Colorado Judge: Bakery Owner discriminated against gay couple [W:123]

If the congrgation of the Westboro Baptist Church or the KKK came into my restaurant for coffee and donuts I wouldn't serve them because I feel that would be my right. It seems you would serve them, which stems from a law you support.

what does the either group have to do with the store owner illegally discrimination and violating/infringing on equal rights?

it seems you are making stuff up


what i support is not illegally discrimination and violating/infringing on equal rights :shrug:
 
Re: Colorado Judge: Bakery Owner discriminated against gay couple [W:123]

what does the either group have to do with the store owner illegally discrimination and violating/infringing on equal rights?

it seems you are making stuff up


what i support is not illegally discrimination and violating/infringing on equal rights :shrug:

Still can't tell me how it's equal rights, can you? I will admit it's a great slogan, but it doesn't make a whole lot of sense here.
 
Re: Colorado Judge: Bakery Owner discriminated against gay couple [W:123]

Still can't tell me how it's equal rights, can you? I will admit it's a great slogan, but it doesn't make a whole lot of sense here.

see ruling it will educate you to the facts which is why your opinion is meaningless and factual wrong
 
Re: Colorado Judge: Bakery Owner discriminated against gay couple [W:123]

see ruling it will educate you to the facts which is why your opinion is meaningless and factual wrong

Factually wrong? I don't believe you have ever shown how. Care to do it here and now? Lets see if you can manage.
 
Re: Colorado Judge: Bakery Owner discriminated against gay couple [W:123]

Factually wrong? I don't believe you have ever shown how. Care to do it here and now? Lets see if you can manage.

yes factually wrong and it was done when the judges ruling was quoted, facts > your opinion.
 
Re: Colorado Judge: Bakery Owner discriminated against gay couple [W:123]

yes factually wrong and it was done when the judges ruling was quoted, facts > your opinion.

So basically you think the court ends the discussion. I believe that is the argument of a statist, not the argument of a person with their own mind.
 
Re: Colorado Judge: Bakery Owner discriminated against gay couple [W:123]

1.)So basically you think the court ends the discussion?
2.)I believe that is the argument of a statist, not the argument of a person with their own mind.

1.) nope never made that claim, thats a failed strawman
2.) since that claim wasnt made your opinion is again meanignless

is there ANYTHING YOU HAVE ON TOPIC? just another post about ME and i am not the topic

PLEASE STAY ON TOPIC
 
Re: Colorado Judge: Bakery Owner discriminated against gay couple [W:113:123:292]

The ruling in is. Chalk another one up for the good guys
Colorado judge: Bakery owner discriminated against gay couple - Washington TimesA Colorado judge ruled Friday against a bakery owner who refused to prepare a cake for a gay couple’s wedding reception.

Administrative Law Judge Robert N. Spencer ordered Jack Phillips, owner of Masterpiece Cakeshop in Lakewood, to “cease and desist from discriminating against complainants and other same-sex couples by refusing to sell them wedding cakes or any other product [he] would provide to heterosexual couples.”

Read more: Colorado judge: Bakery owner discriminated against gay couple - Washington Times
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter


Another ruling that bigotry will no longer be tolerated in America. If this baker is truly concerned about his religious beliefs....perhaps he should start by trying to be more "Christ-like" and try living the principles that Jesus Christ taught.

OK im sorry but this is just stupid. Im not saying its right that he is discriminating, but segregation happens all over the place every day. Just pick another bakery instead of sueing the guy for it. Half the time i thing they just want the money and barely give a crap about the segregation.
 
Re: Colorado Judge: Bakery Owner discriminated against gay couple [W:123]

1.) nope never made that claim, thats a failed strawman
2.) since that claim wasnt made your opinion is again meanignless

is there ANYTHING YOU HAVE ON TOPIC? just another post about ME and i am not the topic

PLEASE STAY ON TOPIC

Since the only fact that is your side is court rulings what else could you be using?

yes factually wrong and it was done when the judges ruling was quoted, facts > your opinion.

Please tell me what other facts you have?
 
Re: Colorado Judge: Bakery Owner discriminated against gay couple [W:113:123:292]

OK im sorry but this is just stupid. Im not saying its right that he is discriminating, but segregation happens all over the place every day. Just pick another bakery instead of sueing the guy for it. Half the time i thing they just want the money and barely give a crap about the segregation.

nothing wrong with fighting for your rights, it something that should be done

also what money? do you have a link to the full rulling? did i miss something?

also thats an HONEST question not being a smart ass lol i only read that the baker was ordered to “cease and desist from discriminating” but it is 13 pages long im guessing ive only seen about a 3rd of it.
 
Re: Colorado Judge: Bakery Owner discriminated against gay couple [W:123]

1.) Since the only fact that is your side is court rulings what else could you be using?



Please tell me what other facts you have?

1.) what? i have no idea what this says but you do seem to be saying i have posted facts now, before it was i didnt have any weird
2.) the ruling makes you wrong, not sure what else is needed

also do you have any FACTS that support you and prove the ruling factually wrong? any? not your OPINIONS facts?
 
Re: Colorado Judge: Bakery Owner discriminated against gay couple [W:123]

1.) what? i have no idea what this says but you do seem to be saying i have posted facts now, before it was i didnt have any weird
2.) the ruling makes you wrong, not sure what else is needed

also do you have any FACTS that support you and prove the ruling factually wrong? any? not your OPINIONS facts?

So like I said, the only thing you are using is a court ruling. You might as well admit you are unwilling to think about the issue if that is all you're going to do. Maybe you should consider having some sort of idea what equal rights means and argue from that foundation instead of just claiming it is equal rights because nine people say it is.
 
Re: Colorado Judge: Bakery Owner discriminated against gay couple [W:123]

1.)So like I said, the only thing you are using is a court ruling.
2.) You might as well admit you are unwilling to think about the issue if that is all you're going to do.

1.) no not like you said, you made this failed straw man and false claim "So basically you think the court ends the discussion? " this was never said.
now a reframe, moving the goal post is being attempted and its also failing
2.) no need since your straw man failed

please continue making posts about me though and not that topic it will get you in your usual place.

Now do you have anything on topic and that topic is not me?
 
Re: Colorado Judge: Bakery Owner discriminated against gay couple [W:123]

what does the either group have to do with the store owner illegally discrimination and violating/infringing on equal rights?

it seems you are making stuff up


what i support is not illegally discrimination and violating/infringing on equal rights :shrug:

Can you refuse service because of someone's religion?
 
Re: Colorado Judge: Bakery Owner discriminated against gay couple [W:123]

1.) nope never made that claim, thats a failed strawman
2.) since that claim wasnt made your opinion is again meanignless

is there ANYTHING YOU HAVE ON TOPIC? just another post about ME and i am not the topic

PLEASE STAY ON TOPIC

He is spot on topic.
 
Re: Colorado Judge: Bakery Owner discriminated against gay couple [W:123]

Can you refuse service because of someone's religion?

more details please

whats the service, whos doing the refusing, where is this taking place etc etc
 
Re: Colorado Judge: Bakery Owner discriminated against gay couple [W:123]

He is spot on topic.

100% false since im not the topic :shrug:
 
Re: Colorado Judge: Bakery Owner discriminated against gay couple [W:123]

more details please

whats the service, whos doing the refusing, where is this taking place etc etc

Cake, the owner, Colorado.
 
Re: Colorado Judge: Bakery Owner discriminated against gay couple [W:123]

more details please

whats the service, whos doing the refusing, where is this taking place etc etc

If you understood equal rights you would know that doesn't matter.
 
Re: Colorado Judge: Bakery Owner discriminated against gay couple [W:123]

Cake, the owner, Colorado.

that doesnt make sense but if you are referring to the case in the OP simply read the quotes of the rulings to find your answer
 
Back
Top Bottom