Page 139 of 173 FirstFirst ... 3989129137138139140141149 ... LastLast
Results 1,381 to 1,390 of 1723

Thread: Colorado Judge: Bakery Owner discriminated against gay couple [W:113:123:292:647]

  1. #1381
    Sage
    Lursa's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Outside Seattle
    Last Seen
    Today @ 06:58 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Centrist
    Posts
    30,047

    Re: Colorado Judge: Bakery Owner discriminated against gay couple [W:113:123:292:647

    Quote Originally Posted by Ikari View Post
    It's about discrimination over cake. Someone had cake, someone else wanted to buy it, the first person said no, the second person took it to court. Nothing you say will change the fact.
    When Rosa Parks was arrested for not taking a seat in the back of the bus....was it about a bus ride?

    When blacks had to use separate water fountains....was it about a drink of water?

    When employment signs at a cigar store said, "No Jews and no Irish need apply"... was it about selling tobacco?
    Quote Originally Posted by Bucky View Post
    I have felt pain when I was in the womb. So when you say they are incapable of feeling pain, that is based on junk science.
    Quote Originally Posted by applejuicefool View Post
    A murderer putting a bullet through someone's brain is a medical procedure too.

  2. #1382
    I'm kind of a big deal

    AGENT J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Last Seen
    Today @ 07:26 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    44,835

    Re: Colorado Judge: Bakery Owner discriminated against gay couple [W:113:123:292:647

    Quote Originally Posted by Ikari View Post
    It is about cake. The discrimination is secondary in this case since it involves no rights. But I never once said it wasn't discrimination. Please try to make more honest arguments in the future.
    100% factually false cake is secondary and meaningless, this fact will never change want MORE FACTUAL PROOF besides the the court case being based on DISCRIMINATION even though that all that is needed.

    replace the cake with flowers, case still exist, why? because of illegal discrimination
    replaces the discrimination with not discriminating, case goes away, why? no illegal discrimination

    honesty and facts destroy and prove your post 100% wrong again.
    Last edited by AGENT J; 12-10-13 at 08:57 PM.
    This space is currently owned by The Great Winchester, stay tuned for future messages!
    Make America Great Again!
    Pro-Equal Rights / Pro-Gun Rights / Pro-Human Rights / Pro-Choice

  3. #1383
    Guru

    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Columbus, OH
    Last Seen
    Today @ 07:13 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    4,489

    Re: Colorado Judge: Bakery Owner discriminated against gay couple [W:113:123:292:647

    Quote Originally Posted by Lursa View Post
    When Rosa Parks was arrested for not taking a seat in the back of the bus....was it about a bus ride?

    When blacks had to use separate water fountains....was it about a drink of water?

    When employment signs at a cigar store said, "No Jews and no Irish need apply"... was it about selling tobacco?
    Of course, the difference between Rosa Parks and the religious zealots is that they complain about being martyrs after deliberately putting themselves in these situations as if they're surprised that civil disobedience has legal consequences.

  4. #1384
    I'm kind of a big deal

    AGENT J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Last Seen
    Today @ 07:26 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    44,835

    Re: Colorado Judge: Bakery Owner discriminated against gay couple [W:113:123:292:647

    Quote Originally Posted by Fletch View Post
    1.)Criminal owner???
    2.)If you were half the advocate of rights you claim to be, you would be defending the rights of the individual store owner to act according to his own will and his own standards.
    3.) Instead you defend the power of the state to impose its will upon free men.
    1.) yes, he committed a crime and broke the law by definition of the word crime and criminal thats what he is
    2.) i am defending the rights of the individual, because those are tho only ones that were infringed on, the store owners are factually intact.

    he has not right to act to his standards if it breaks the law and infringes on the rights of others

    3.) factually false i defend a criminal facing the consequences and the government protecting the law and rights of the individuals that had them infringed on.
    Same rights i have, same rights the owner has and same rights the couple has but only one of us chose to break the law and infringe on anothers rights and that was the owner.

    he'll know better next time
    This space is currently owned by The Great Winchester, stay tuned for future messages!
    Make America Great Again!
    Pro-Equal Rights / Pro-Gun Rights / Pro-Human Rights / Pro-Choice

  5. #1385
    Sage
    Lursa's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Outside Seattle
    Last Seen
    Today @ 06:58 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Centrist
    Posts
    30,047

    Re: Colorado Judge: Bakery Owner discriminated against gay couple [W:113:123:292:647

    Quote Originally Posted by Ikari View Post
    It is about cake. The discrimination is secondary in this case since it involves no rights. But I never once said it wasn't discrimination. Please try to make more honest arguments in the future.
    It involves the same rights as if the complainants had been black or Jewish. Sexual orientation is a protected class in CO.
    Quote Originally Posted by Bucky View Post
    I have felt pain when I was in the womb. So when you say they are incapable of feeling pain, that is based on junk science.
    Quote Originally Posted by applejuicefool View Post
    A murderer putting a bullet through someone's brain is a medical procedure too.

  6. #1386
    I'm kind of a big deal

    AGENT J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Last Seen
    Today @ 07:26 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    44,835

    Re: Colorado Judge: Bakery Owner discriminated against gay couple [W:113:123:292:647

    Quote Originally Posted by Ikari View Post
    The case was based on a gay couple being refused a cake. No matter what you say, you cannot change that fact.
    100% factually false proven by facts already.

    case was filed based on what? DISCRIMINATION
    case went to a judge based on what? DISCRIMINATION
    case was ruled on and the judged based his rulling on what? DISCRIMINATION
    not cake

    can a case be brought to court based on cake? factually no
    is cake in general illegal? factually no
    does cake break the law and infringe on rights? factually no
    your post is destroyed again by facts, remind me what you have to support your failed post again? thats right nothing

    facts, the court case and the ruling all prove your post wrong
    This space is currently owned by The Great Winchester, stay tuned for future messages!
    Make America Great Again!
    Pro-Equal Rights / Pro-Gun Rights / Pro-Human Rights / Pro-Choice

  7. #1387
    I'm kind of a big deal

    AGENT J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Last Seen
    Today @ 07:26 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    44,835

    Re: Colorado Judge: Bakery Owner discriminated against gay couple [W:113:123:292:647

    Quote Originally Posted by Lursa View Post
    When Rosa Parks was arrested for not taking a seat in the back of the bus....was it about a bus ride?

    When blacks had to use separate water fountains....was it about a drink of water?

    When employment signs at a cigar store said, "No Jews and no Irish need apply"... was it about selling tobacco?
    facts like this will be ignored
    This space is currently owned by The Great Winchester, stay tuned for future messages!
    Make America Great Again!
    Pro-Equal Rights / Pro-Gun Rights / Pro-Human Rights / Pro-Choice

  8. #1388
    Sage
    Lursa's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Outside Seattle
    Last Seen
    Today @ 06:58 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Centrist
    Posts
    30,047

    Re: Colorado Judge: Bakery Owner discriminated against gay couple [W:113:123:292:647

    Quote Originally Posted by Ikari View Post
    The case was based on a gay couple being refused a cake. No matter what you say, you cannot change that fact.
    Rosa Park's arrest was about a woman who would not move to her specific part of a bus. Sounds pretty innocuous to me. And yet it was one form of fighting for one's civil rights.

    The precedent is seen throughout American history, civil disobedience, legal pressure (like law suits), petitioning legislators...all seemingly minor on their own, but bring awareness which contribute to tipping the scales.
    Quote Originally Posted by Bucky View Post
    I have felt pain when I was in the womb. So when you say they are incapable of feeling pain, that is based on junk science.
    Quote Originally Posted by applejuicefool View Post
    A murderer putting a bullet through someone's brain is a medical procedure too.

  9. #1389
    Sage
    Lursa's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Outside Seattle
    Last Seen
    Today @ 06:58 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Centrist
    Posts
    30,047

    Re: Colorado Judge: Bakery Owner discriminated against gay couple [W:113:123:292:647

    Quote Originally Posted by AGENT J View Post
    facts like this will be ignored
    Yes, but that's why I have my signature...the one in green.
    Quote Originally Posted by Bucky View Post
    I have felt pain when I was in the womb. So when you say they are incapable of feeling pain, that is based on junk science.
    Quote Originally Posted by applejuicefool View Post
    A murderer putting a bullet through someone's brain is a medical procedure too.

  10. #1390
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Last Seen
    02-18-14 @ 08:18 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    5,660

    Re: Colorado Judge: Bakery Owner discriminated against gay couple [W:123]

    Quote Originally Posted by AGENT J View Post
    no crying just like pointing out that your post was 100% factually wrong, remind me who attacked the facts? that was you so . . . . .

    please continue to post lies though

    when you have anything on topic and any facts to support your proven wrong statement let us know
    when you can do anything but show tears, please do so

    Colorado judges do not speak for the whole country

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •